The purpose of this study was to examine the development of oral reading fluency in a sample of first-grade children. Using growth curve analysis, models of growth were identified for a combined sample of at-risk (AR) and not-at-risk (NAR) children, and predictors of growth were identified for the longitudinal AR sample in first and second grade. Large and serious differences in reading fluency growth between the AR and NAR samples were apparent early, replicating other reports. Theories of sight-word learning and reading fluency were supported, in that letter-sound fluency was a uniquely significant predictor of first-grade reading fluency. The effects of phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming were mediated by the other variables in the model. Growth in first-grade oral reading fluency accounted for the most unique variance in second-grade growth and end-of-year performance. The results suggest that word reading fluency should be regarded as developing concomitantly with early word recognition rather than as a later-developing skill.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allor, J.H. (2002). The relationship of phonemic awareness and rapid naming to reading development. Learning Disability Quarterly , 25, 47—57.
2.
Biemiller, A. (1977—1978). Relationships between oral reading rates for letter, words, and simple text in the development of reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 13, 223—253.
3.
Benes, K.M. (1995). Review of Social Skills Rating System. In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 965—967). Lincoln: University of Nebraska, Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.
4.
Bourassa, D.C., Levy, B.A., Dowin, S., & Casey, A. (1998). Transfer effects across contextual and linguistic boundaries: Evidence from poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 45—61.
5.
Chard, D.J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B.J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386—406.
6.
Compton, D.L. (2000). Modeling the growth of decoding skills in first-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 219—259.
7.
Compton, D.L. (2003). Modeling the relationship between growth in rapid naming speed and decoding skills in first grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 225—239.
8.
Demaray, M.K., & Elliott, S.N. (1998). Teacher judgments of students' academic functioning: A comparison of actual and predicted performance. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 8—24.
9.
Demaray, M.K., Ruffalo, S.L., Carlson, J., Busse, R.T., Olson, A.E., McManus, S.M., et al. (1995). Social skills assessment: A comparison of six published rating scales. School Psychology Review, 24, 648— 671.
10.
Deno, S.L., Fuchs, L.S., Marston, D., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507—524.
11.
Ehri, L.C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107—143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Ehri, L.C. (1997). Sight word learning in normal readers and dyslexics . In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia (pp. 163—189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Stahl, S., & Willows, D.M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393—447.
14.
Ehri, L.C., & Wilce, L.S. (1983). Development of word identification speed in skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology , 75, 3—18.
15.
Elliott, J., Lee, S.W., & Tollefson, N. (2001). A reliability and validity study of the Dynamic Indicators of Early Literacy Skills— Modified. School Psychology Review, 30, 33—49.
16.
Foorman, B.R., & Torgesen, J. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small group instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 203—212.
17.
Francis, D.J., Schatschneider, C., & Carlson, C.D. (2000). Introduction to individual growth curve analysis . In D. Drotar (Ed.), Handbook of research in pediatric and clinical child psychology (pp. 51—73). New York: Plenum.
18.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., Yen, L., McMaster, K., Svenson, E., Yang, N., et al. (2001). Developing first-grade reading fluency through peer mediation. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 90—93.
19.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M.K., & Jenkins, J. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239—256.
20.
Fuchs, L.S., Hamlett, C.L., & Fuchs, D. (1997). MSBP basic reading manual (2nd ed.). Macintosh version [Computer software]. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
21.
Gresham, F.M., & Elliott, S.N. (1990). The social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
22.
Harris, A.J., & Sipay, E.K. (1985). How to increase reading ability: A guide to developmental and remedial methods. White Plains, NY: Longman.
23.
Jenkins, J.R., & O'Connor, R.E. (2002). Early identification and intervention for young children with reading/learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danileson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to Practice (pp. 99—149). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
24.
Kame'enui, E.J., & Simmons, D.C. (2001). Introduction to this special issue: The DNA of reading fluency. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 203—210.
25.
Kuhn, M.R., & Stahl, S.A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3—21.
26.
Levy, B.A. (2001). Moving the bottom: Improving reading fluency. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 357— 379). Timonium, MD: York Press.
27.
McKinney, J.D., Mason, J., Perkerson, K., & Clifford, M. (1975). The relationship between classroom behavior and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 198—203.
28.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Report of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development .
SAS Institute. (1999). SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 8. Cary, NC: Author.
31.
Sattler, J.M. (1998). Assessment of children (3rd ed). San Diego: Author.
32.
Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C.D., Francis, D.J., Foorman, B.R., & Fletcher, J.M. (2002). Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: Implications for the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 35, 245—256.
33.
Singer, J.D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 323—355.
34.
Speece, D.L., & Case, L.P. (2001). Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 735—749.
35.
Speece, D.L., Case, L.P., & Ritchey, K.D. (n.d.). Curriculum based measures for early literacy. Retrieved December 5, 2003, from http://www.glue.umd.edu/~dlspeece/cbmreading
36.
Speece, D.L., Mills, C., Ritchey, K.D., & Hillman, E. (2003). Initial evidence that letter fluency tasks are valid indicators of early reading skill. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 223—233.
37.
Speece, D.L., & Ritchey, K.D. (2003, February). Predicting growth and May status on fluency measures in at-risk first grade children. Presented at the Pacific Coast Research Conference, La Jolla, CA.
38.
Stage, S.A., Abbott, R.D., Jenkins, J.R., & Berninger, V.W. (2003). Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQword reading discrepancy: Failure to validate discrepancy method. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 24—33.
39.
Stage, S.A., Sheppard, J., Davidson, M.M., & Browning, M.M. (2001). Prediction of first-graders' growth in oral reading fluency using kindergarten letter fluency. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 225—237.
40.
Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C.A., & Alexander, A.W. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 333—355). Timonium, MD: York Press.
41.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). TOWRE: Test of world reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
42.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., et al. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579—593.
43.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Chen, R., Pratt, A., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-toremediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601—638.
44.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73—87.
45.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing . Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
46.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., Laughon, N.P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1993). Development of young readers' phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83—103.
47.
Walsh, D., Price, G., & Gillingham, M. (1988). The critical but transitory importance of letter naming. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 108—122.
48.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children—Revised . New York: Psychological Corp.
49.
Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211—239.
