In this quasi-experimental study, which is part of a series of investigations on supplemental reading tutoring variations, the relative effectiveness of more intense decoding instruction or text reading practice was examined. Fifty-seven first-grade students scoring in the lowest quartile for reading skills received either classroom reading instruction or one of two treatments: tutoring in word study with text reading practice, or word study tutoring alone. Individual instruction was provided by trained paraprofessional tutors. At the end of first grade, treatment students significantly outperformed their nontutored peers on measures of reading accuracy, reading comprehension, reading efficiency, passage reading fluency, and spelling. Differential treatment effects on passage reading fluency are examined, taking into consideration pretest skill levels and text reading practice characteristics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
2.
Allington, R.L., & Woodside-Jiron, H. (1998). Decodable text in beginning reading: Are mandates and policy based on research?ERS Spectrum , 16(2), 3—11.
3.
Anderson, R., Hiebert, E., Scott, J., & Wilkinson, I. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission onReading. Washington, DC: National Institute of Eduation, U.S. Dept. of Education.
4.
Armbruster, B.B., Lehr, F., & Osborne, J.H. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read: Kindergarten through grade 3. Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement (CIERA) for the Partnership forReading, National Institute for Literacy, National Institute for Child, Health, and Human Development, and U.S. Department of Education.
5.
Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Keating, T. (2000). When less may be more: A 2-year longitudinal evaluation of a volunteer tutoring program requiring minimal training. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 494—519.
6.
Berninger, V.W. (1998). Process Assessment of the Learner (PAL): Guides for intervention. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
7.
Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., Billingsley, F., & Nagy, W. (2001). Processes underlying timing and fluency of reading: Efficiency, automaticity, coordination, and morphological awareness. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 383—414). Timonium, MD: York Press.
8.
Berninger, V.W., Thalberg, S., DeBruyn, I., & Smith, R. (1987). Preventing reading disabilities by assessing and remediating phonemic skills. School Psychology Review, 16, 554—565.
9.
Berninger, V., & Traweek, D. (1991). Effects of a two-phase reading intervention on three orthographic—phonological code connections. Learning and Individual Differences, 3, 323—338.
10.
Blachman, B.A., Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J.M., & Clonan, S.M. (2003). Early reading intervention: A classroom prevention study and a remediation study. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 253—271). Timonium, MD: York Press.
11.
Blachman, B.A., Tangel, D.M., Ball, E.W., Black, R., & McGraw, C.K. (1999). Developing phonological awareness and word recognition skills: A two-year intervention with low-income, inner-city children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 239—273.
12.
Brown, K.J. (1999/2000). What kind of text—For whom and when? Textual scaffolding for beginning readers. The Reading Teacher, 52, 292—307.
13.
Bus, A.G., & van IJzendoorn, M.H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 403—414.
14.
Chard, D.J., & Kame'enui, E.J. (2000). Struggling first-grade readers: The frequency and progress of their reading. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 28—38.
15.
Dohower, S. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers' fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly , 22, 389—406.
16.
Dunn, L.M., Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, D.M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
17.
Ehri, L.C., & McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14, 153— 163.
18.
Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Stahl, S.A., & Willows, D.M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393—447.
19.
Ehri, L.C., & Sweet, J. (1991). Fingerpointreading of memorized text: What enables beginners to process the print. Reading Research Quarterly , 24, 442—462.
20.
Ehri, L.C., & Wilce, L.S. (1985). Movement into reading: Is the first stage of printed word learning visual or phonetic?Reading Research Quarterly , 20, 163—179.
21.
Ehri, L.C., & Wilce, L.S. (1987). Cipher versus cue reading: An experiment in decoding acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 3—13.
22.
Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M.T., & Moody, S.W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology , 92, 605—619.
23.
Elkonin, D.B. (1973). USSR. In J. Downing (Ed.), Comparative reading: Cross-national studies of behavior and processes in reading and writing (pp. 551—579). New York : Macmillan.
24.
Faulkner, H.J., & Levy, B.A. (1994). How text difficulty and reader skill interact to produce differential reliance on word and content overlap in reading transfer . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 1—24.
25.
Faulkner, H.J., & Levy, B.A. (1999). Fluent and nonfluent forms of transfer in reading: Words and their message. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , 6, 111—116.
26.
Fleisher, L., Jenkins, J., & Pany, D. (1979). Effects on poor readers' comprehension of training in rapid decoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 30—48.
27.
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37—55.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Thompson, A., Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Yang, N.J., et al. (2001). Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 251—267.
30.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M.K., & Jenkins, J.R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239— 256.
31.
Gaskins, I.W., Anderson, R.C., Pressley, M., Cunicelli, E.A., & Satlow, E. (1993). The moves and cycles of cognitive process instruction . Elementary School Journal, 93, 277—304.
32.
Gaskins, I.W., Rauch, S., Gensemer, E., Cunicelli, E., O'Hara, C., Six, L., et al. (1997). In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 43—73). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
33.
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds). (2001). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (5th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for Development of Educational Achievement. Retrieved March 6, 2004, from http://dibels.uoregon.edu
34.
Good, R.H., Simmons, D.C., & Kameenui, E.J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257— 288.
35.
Good, R.H., Simmons, D.C., & Smith, S. (1998). Effective academic interventions in the United States: Evaluating and enhancing the acquisition of early reading skills. School Psychology Review, 27, 45—56.
36.
Haynes, M.C., & Jenkins, J.R. (1986). Reading instruction in special education resource rooms. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 161—190.
37.
Hiebert, E.H. (2002). Standard assessments and text difficulty. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 337—369). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
38.
Hiebert, E.H. (1998). Early literacy instruction. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
39.
Hiebert, E.H., Brown, Z.A., Taitague, C., Fisher, C.W., & Adler, M.A. (2003). Texts and English language learners: Scaffolding entree to reading. In F. Boyd, C. Brock, & M. Rozendal (Eds.), Multicultural and multilingual literacy and language practices (pp. 27—58). New York: Guilford .
40.
Houghton Mifflin. (1999). Invitations to literacy. Boston : Author.
41.
Iversen, S., & Tunmer, W.E. (1993). Phonological processing skills and the Reading Recovery Program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 112—126.
42.
Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G.S. (1984). Wide range achievement test—Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak.
43.
Jenkins, J.R., Peyton, J.A., Sanders, E.A., & Vadasy, P.F. (2004). Effects of reading decodable texts in supplemental first-grade tutoring. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 53—85.
44.
Jenkins, J.R., Vadasy, P.F., Firebaugh, M., & Profilet, C. (2000). Tutoring first-grade struggling readers in phonological reading skills. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 15, 75—84.
45.
Johnston, F.R., Invernizzi, M., & Juel, C. (1998). Book buddies: Guidelines for volunteer tutoring of emergent and early readers. New York: Guilford.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437—447.
48.
Juel, C., & Roper-Schneider, D. (1985). The influence of basal readers on first grade reading. Reading Research Quarterly , 20, 134—152.
49.
Kaminski, R.A., & Good, R.H. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215—227.
50.
Kendall Hunt. (1999). Pegasus II. Dubuque, IA: Author.
51.
Kuhn, M.R., & Stahl, S.A. (2000). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3—21.
52.
Lee, V.E., & Burkam, D.T. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
53.
Levy, B.A., Abello, B., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Transfer from word training to reading in context: Gains in reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 173—188.
Maslen, B.L. (1999). Bob books. New York: Scholastic .
56.
Menon, S., & Hiebert, E.H. (1999). Literature anthologies: The task for first-grade readers. (CIERA Report #1-109) . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan , Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
57.
Mesmer, H.A. (1999). Scaffolding a crucial transition using text with some decodability. The Reading Teacher, 53, 130—142.
58.
Mesmer, H.A. (2001). Decodable text: A review of what we know. Reading Research and Instruction, 40, 121—142.
59.
Mesmer, H.A. (2005). Text decodability and the first grade reader. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 61—86.
60.
Microsoft. (2001). Microsoft Office XP Professional: Excel XP. Redmond, WA: Author.
61.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (Pub No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
62.
National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
63.
O'Connor, R.E. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 15, 43—54.
64.
Perfetti, C.A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition . In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145—174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
65.
Pinnell, G.S., & Fountas, I.C. (1997). Help America read: A handbook for volunteers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
66.
Rashotte, C.A., & Torgesen, J.K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly , 20, 180—188.
67.
Rosner, J., & Simon, D. (1971). The auditory analysis test: An initial report . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 40—48.
68.
Share, D.L., & Jorm, A.F. (1987). Segmental analysis: Co-requisite to reading, vital for self-teaching, requiring phonological memory. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 509—513.
69.
Spss. (1999). SPSS 10.0 for Windows and Smart Viewer. Chicago: Author .
70.
Stage, S., Abbott, R.D., Jenkins, J., & Berninger, V.W. (2003). Predicting response to early reading intervention using verbal IQ—word reading related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal-IQ—word reading discrepancy . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 24—33.
71.
Stahl, S.A., & Murray, B. (1998). Issues involved in defining phonological awareness and its relation to early reading. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 65— 88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
72.
Tan, A., & Nicholson, T. (1997). Flashcards revisited: Training poor readers to read words faster improves their comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 276—288.
73.
Torgesen, J.K. (1998). Instructional interventions for children with reading disabilities. In B. Shapiro, P. Accardo, & A. Capute (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 197—220). Park-ton, MD: York Press.
74.
Torgesen, J.K., Alexander, A.W., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Voeller, K.S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33—58.
75.
Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C.A., & Alexander, A.W. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes . In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 333—355).Timonium, MD: York Press.
76.
Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C.A., Alexander, A., Alexander, J., & MacPhee, K. (2003). Progress toward understanding the instructional conditions necessary for remediating reading difficulties in older children . In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 275—297). Timonium, MD: York Press.
77.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
78.
Torgesen, J., Wagner, R., Rashotte, C., Alexander, A., & Conway, T. (1997). Preventive and remedial interventions for children with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 8, 51—61.
79.
Vadasy, P.F., Jenkins, J.R., Antil, L.R., Wayne, S.K., & O'Connor, R.E. (1997a). Community-based early reading intervention for at-risk first graders. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 29—39.
80.
Vadasy, P.F., Jenkins, J.R., Antil, L.E., Wayne, S.K., & O'Connor, R.E. (1997b). The effectiveness of one-to-one tutoring by community tutors for at-risk beginning readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 126—139.
81.
Vadasy, P.F., Jenkins, J.R., & Pool, K. (2000). Effects of tutoring in phonological and early reading skills on students at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 579—590.
82.
Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E., Peyton, J.A., & Jenkins, J.R. (2002). Timing and intensity of tutoring: A closer look at the conditions for effective early literacy tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 227—241.
83.
Vadasy, P.F., Wayne, S.K., O'Connor, R.E., Jenkins, J.R., Pool, K., Firebaugh, M., et al. (2004). Sound Partners: A supplementary, one-to-one tutoring program in phonics-based early reading skills. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
84.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-toremediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
85.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
