This commentary addresses issues concerning (a) the measurement of numbers, letters, and words versus cognitive processes in early screening batteries, and (b) comorbid associations of reading, math, and attention disorders. Based on reading prediction studies, assessments that include numbers should be most predictive of math outcomes. However, given the comorbid association of reading, math, and attention disorders, measures sensitive to reading and attention difficulties may be necessary in early screening batteries for math disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benton, A.L. (1975). Developmental dyslexia: Neurological aspects. In W. J. Friedlander (Ed.), Advances in neurology (Vol. 7, pp. 2—45). New York: Raven Press.
2.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Mathematical problem solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without comorbid reading disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 563—573.
3.
Geary, D. (1993). Mathematical disabilities: Cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Psychological Bulletin,114, 345—362.
4.
Jansky, J., & de Hirsch, K. (1972). Preventing reading failure—Prediction, diagnosis, intervention. New York: Harper & Row.
5.
Jordan, N., Hanich, L., & Kaplan, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of mathematical competencies in children with specific math difficulties versus children with comorbid mathematics and reading difficulties. Child Development, 74, 834—850.
6.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction . Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
7.
Rourke, B.P. (1975). Brain—behavior relationships in children with learning disabilities: A research programme. The American Psychologist, 30, 911—920.
8.
Rourke, B.P. (1993). Arithmetic disabilities specific and otherwise: A neuropsychological perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 26, 214—226.
9.
Rourke, B.P., & Finlayson, M.A.J. (1978). Neuropsychological significance of variations in patterns of academic performance: Verbal and visual—spatial abilities. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 121—133.
10.
Satz, P., Taylor, H.G., Friel, J., & Fletcher, J.M. (1978). Some developmental and predictive precursors of reading disability. In A. L. Benton & D. Pearl (Eds.), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 457—501). New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Scarborough, H.S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In B. K. Shapiro, A. J. Capute, & B. Shapiro (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 77—121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Carlson, C.D., & Foorman, B.R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265—282.
13.
Silver, A.A., & Hagin, R.A. (1975). Search. New York: Walker Educational Book Corp.
14.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children—Revised . New York: Psychological Corp.
