This article highlights key findings from the small body of research on mathematics difficulties (MD) relevant to early identification and early intervention. The research demonstrates that (a) for many children, mathematics difficulties are not stable over time; (b) the presence of reading difficulties seems related to slower progress in many aspects of mathematics; (c) almost all students with MD demonstrate problems with accurate and automatic retrieval of basic arithmetic combinations, such as 6 + 3. The following measures appear to be valid and reliable indicators of potential MD in kindergartners: (a) magnitude comparison (i.e., knowing which digit in a pair is larger), (b) sophistication of counting strategies, (c) fluent identification of numbers, and (d) working memory (as evidenced by reverse digit span). These are discussed in terms of the components of number sense. Implications for early intervention strategies are explored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
2.
Baker, S., Gersten, R., Flojo, J., Katz, R., Chard, D., & Clarke, B. (2002). Preventing mathematics difficulties in young children: Focus on effective screening of early number sense delays (Tech. Rep. No. 0305). Eugene, OR: Pacific Institutes for Research.
3.
Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Keating, T.J. (2000). When less may be more: A 2-year longitudinal evaluation of a volunteer tutoring program requiring minimal training. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 494—519.
4.
Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 51—73.
5.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1981). From conversation to composition: The role of instruction in a developmental process. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 132—165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
Brownell, W.A., & Carper, D.V. (1943). Learning multiplication combinations. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
7.
Case, R., & Griffin, S. (1990). Child cognitive development: The role of central conceptual structures in the development of scientific and social thoughts. In C. A. Hauert (Ed.), Advances in psychology— Developmental psychology: Cognitive, perception—motor and neurological perspectives . Amsterdam: North Holland.
8.
Case, L.P., Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1992). Improving the mathematical problem-solving skills of students with learning disabilities: Self-regulated strategy development . The Journal of Special Education, 26, 1—19.
9.
Chard, D., Clarke, B., Baker, B., Otterstedt, J., Braun, D., & Katz, R. (in press). Using measures of number sense to screen for difficulties in mathematics: Preliminary findings. Assessment Issues in Special Education.
10.
Clarke, B., & Shinn, M. (2004). A preliminary investigation into the identification and development of early mathematics curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Review, 33, 234—248.
11.
Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics . New York: Oxford University Press .
12.
Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S., Steubing, K., Shaywitz, B., & Fletcher, J. (1994). The measurement of change: Assessing behavior over time and within a developmental context. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement (pp. 29—58). Baltimore: Brookes.
13.
Frick, P.J., Lahey, B.B., Christ, M.A.G., Loeber, R., & Green, S. (1991). History of childhood behavior problems in biological relatives of boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and conduct disorder. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 20, 445-451.
14.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Karns, K. (2001). Enhancing kindergartners' mathematical development: Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 495—510.
15.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Karns, K., Hamlett, C.L., & Katzaroff, M. (1999). Mathematics performance assessment in the classroom: Effects on teacher planning and student problem solving. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 609—646.
16.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Prentice, K. (2004). Responsiveness to mathematical problem-solving instruction: Comparing students at risk of mathematics disability with and without risk of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 37, 293— 306.
17.
Geary, D. (1990). A componential analysis of an early learning deficit in mathematics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386—404.
Geary, D.C. (2003). Learning disabilities in arithmetic: Problem solving differences and cognitive deficits. In H. L. Swanson, K. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 199—212). New York: Guilford .
21.
Geary, D.C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4—15.
22.
Geary, D.C., & Brown, S.C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 787—797.
23.
Geary, D.C., Hamson, C.O., & Hoard, M.K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236—263.
24.
Gersten, R., & Chard, D. (1999). Number sense: Rethinking arithmetic instruction for students with mathematical disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 18—28.
25.
Gersten, R., Chard, D., Baker, S., Jayanthi, M., Flojo, J., & Lee, D. (under review). Experimental and quasi-experimental research on instructional approaches for teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research.
26.
Gersten, R., Chard, D., Griffiths, R., Katz, R., & Bryant, D. (2003, April). Methods and materials for reaching students in early and intermediate mathematics. Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children, Seattle, WA.
27.
Goldman, S.R., & Pellegrino, J.W. (1987). Information processing and educational microcomputer technology: Where do we go from here?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 144—154.
28.
Goldman, S.R., Pellegrino, J.W., & Mertz, D.L. (1988). Extended practice of basic addition facts: Strategy changes in learning disabled students. Cognition and Instruction , 5, 223—265.
29.
Greeno, J. (1991). Number sense as situated knowing in a conceptual domain. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 170—218.
30.
Griffin, S. (1998, April). Fostering the development of whole number sense. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA, San Diego, CA.
31.
Griffin, S. (2004). Building number sense with number worlds: A mathematics program for young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly , 19(1), 173—180.
32.
Griffin, S., & Case, R. (1997). Re-thinking the primary school math curriculum: An approach based on cognitive science. Issues in Education , 3(1), 1—49.
33.
Griffin, S.A., Case, R., & Siegler, R.S. (1994). Rightstart: Providing the central conceptual prerequisites for first formal learning of arithmetic to students at risk for school failure . In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 24—49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
Hanich, L., Jordan, N., Kaplan, D., & Dick, J. (2001). Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 615—626.
35.
Harcourt Educational Measurement. (2001). Stanford achievement test (9th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Author.
36.
Hasselbring, T.S., Goin, L.I., & Bransford, J.D. (1988). Developing math automaticity in learning handicapped children: The role of computerized drill and practice. Focus onExceptional Children, 20(6), 1—7.
37.
Jordan, N., & Hanich, L. (2003). Characteristics of children with moderate mathematics deficiencies: A longitudinal perspective. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 213—221.
38.
Jordan, N., Hanich, L., & Kaplan, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of mathematical competencies in children with specific mathematics difficulties versus children with comorbid mathematics and reading difficulties. Child Development, 74, 834— 850.
39.
Jordan, N., Kaplan, D., & Hanich, L. (2002). Achievement growth in children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Findings of a two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 586— 597.
40.
Jordan, N., Levine, S., & Huttenlocher, J. (1994). Development of calculation abilities in middle and low income children after formal instruction in school . Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 223—240.
41.
Jordan, N., & Montani, T. (1997). Cognitive arithmetic and problem solving: A comparison of children with specific and general mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 624—634.
42.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437—447.
43.
Kalchman, M., Moss, J., & Case, R. (2001). Psychological models for the development of mathematical understanding: Rational numbers and functions. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction (pp. 1—38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44.
LeFevre, J., Bisanz, J., Daley, K., Buffone, L., Greenham, S., & Sadesky, G. (1996). Multiple routes to solution of single-digit multiplication problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 284—306.
45.
Liberman, I.Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A.M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler & I. Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 1—33). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
46.
Milgram, J. (2004, March 7—10). Assessing students'mathematics learning: Issues, costs, and benefits. Paper presented at the MSRI (Math Science Research Institute) workshop, Berkley, CA.
47.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. J Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.), Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
48.
O'Connor, R.E., Notari-Syverson, A., & Vadasy, P.F. (1996). Ladders to literacy: The effects of teacher-led phonological activities for kindergarten children with and without learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 117—130.
49.
Okamoto, Y., & Case, R. (1996). Exploring the microstructure of children's central conceptual structures in the domain of number. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61, 27—59.
50.
Ostad, S. (1998). Developmental differences in solving simple arithmetic word problems and simple number-fact problems: A comparison of mathematically disabled children. MathematicalCognition, 4(1), 1—19.
51.
Pellegrino, J.W., & Goldman, S.R. (1987). Information processing and elementary mathematics . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 23—32.
52.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R., & Alibali, M. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 346—362.
53.
Robinson, C., Menchetti, B., & Torgesen, J. (2002). Toward a two-factor theory of one type of mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 17, 81—89.
54.
Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C.D., Francis, D.J., Foorman, B., & Fletcher, J. (2002). Relationships of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: Implications for the double deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 35, 245—256.
55.
Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J., Francis, D.J., Carlson, C.D., & Foorman, B. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265—282.
56.
Shrager, J., & Siegler, R.S. (1998). SCADS: A model of children's strategy choices and strategy discoveries. Psychological Science, 9, 405—422.
57.
Siegel, L., & Ryan, E. (1988). Development of grammatical-sensitivity, phonological, and short-term memory skills in normally achieving and learning disabled children . Developmental Psychology, 24, 28— 37.
58.
Siegler, R. (1988). Individual differences in strategy choices: Good students, not-so-good students, and perfectionists. Child Development, 59, 833—851.
59.
Siegler, R.S., & Shrager, J. (1984). Strategy choice in addition and subtraction: How do children know what to do? In C. Sophian (Ed.), Origins of cognitive skills (pp. 229—293). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
60.
Swanson, H.L., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M.E. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 471— 491.
61.
Vellutino, F., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-toremediate and readily remediated poor readers: Intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experimental deficits as basic cause of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601—638.
62.
Woodcock, R., & Johnson, M. (1990). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery: Test of achievement. Chicago: Riverside .
63.
Woodcock, R., & Mather, N. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement Standard and Supplemental Batteries: Examiner's manual. Allen, TX : DLM.
64.
Woodward, J., & Montague, M. (2002). Meeting the challenge of mathematics reform for students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 89—101.
