First, discourse is discussed as concerning the subtler lineaments of knowledge production in notions about difference and difficulty. The unhelpful influences that these notions have had on the development of special education research and practice are discussed. The importance of the scholar—practitioner in undoing some of these understandings is further developed. Second, the point is stressed that politics and political questions are intertwined with empirical questions and that a discourse of objectivity propagates and fosters a belief that the supposed paraphernalia of science (measurement, experiment, prediction) can be employed without cost. Third, the point is made that the individual discourse is rooted in the theoretical context of special education—with unhelpful consequences for the way that difficulty continues to be construed as rooted in individuals, whether those individuals be children or schools.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andreski, S. (1972). Social sciences as sorcery. London: Deutsch.
2.
Barker, R.G. (1968). Ecological psychology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
Burbules, N.C. (1992). Forms of ideology-critique: A pedagogical perspective . International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education , 5(1), 7—17.
4.
Carson, S. (1992). Normalisation, needs and schools, Educational Psychology in Practice, 7, 216—222.
5.
Cicourel, A.V., & Kitsuse, J.I. (1968). The social organisation of the high school and deviant adolescent careers. In E. Rubington & M. S. Weinberg (Eds.), Deviance: The interactionist perspective; Text and readings in the sociology of deviance. London: Macmillan.
6.
Corbett, J. (1996) Bad-mouthing. London: Falmer.
7.
Department of Education and Science. (1978 ). Special educational needs. Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Education of Handicapped Children and Young People, Cmnd. 7212. London: HMSO.
8.
Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15—23.
9.
Fish, S. (1994). There's no such thing as free speech. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish (Sheridan, Trans. A.). London: Penguin.
11.
Giddens, A. (1990) The consequences of modernity. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press.
12.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94, 328—355.
13.
Hoggart, R. (2001). Politics, anti-politics and the unpolitical: The universities in the second half of the twentieth century. In R. Hoggart (Ed.), Between two worlds (pp. 145—168). London: Aurum Press.
14.
Hornby, G. (1999). Inclusion or delusion: Can one size fit all?Support for Learning, 14, 152—157.
15.
Jordan, A., Lindsay, L., and Stanovich, P.J. (1997). Classroom teachers' instructional interactions with students who are exceptional, at risk, and typically achieving. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 82—93.
16.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1998). The politics of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21, 245—273.
17.
Labov, W. (1973). The logic of nonstandard English. In F. Williams (Ed.), Language and Poverty (pp. 150—174). Chicago: Rand Mc-Nally.
18.
Laing, R.D. (1960). The divided self: An existential study of sanity and madness. London: Travistock Books.
19.
Lehrer, T. (1965). Wernher von Braun. On That was the year that was [CD]. Burbank, CA: Reprise Records .
20.
Levins, R., & Lewontin, R. (1985). The dialectical biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Neisser, U. (Ed.). (1986). The school achievement of minority children. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
22.
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., & Ouston, J. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. London: Open Books.
23.
Sammons, P., Nuttall, D., & Cuttance, P. (1993). Differential school effectiveness: results from a re-analysis of the Inner London Education Authority's Junior School Project Data. British Educational Research Journal,19, 381—405.
24.
Schön, D.A. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
25.
Skinner, B.F. (1972). Beyond freedom and dignity. London: Cape.
26.
Skrtic, T.M. (1991). The special education paradox: Equity as the way to excellence. Harvard Educational Review, 61, 148—206.
27.
Smith, F. (1993). Whose language? What power? A universal conflict in a South African setting. New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
Smith, F. (1998). The book of learning and forgetting. New York: Teachers College Press.
29.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development . London: Heinemann.
30.
Szasz, T.S. (1972). The myth of mental illness: Foundations of a theory of personal conduct. London: Paladin .
31.
Thomas, G., & Davis, P. (1997). Special needs: Objective reality or personal construction? Judging reading difficulty after the Code. Educational Research , 39, 263—270.
32.
Thomas, G., & Loxley, A. (2001). Deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
33.
Weatherley, R., & Lipsky, M. (1977). Street level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: Implementing special educational reform. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 171—197.
34.
Wilson, J. (2000). Doing justice to inclusion. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 15, 297—304.
35.
Wolfensberger, W. (1990). Human service policies: The rhetoric versus the reality. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and dependency (pp. 23—41). London: Falmer.
36.
Wood, S., & Shears, B. (1986). Teaching children with severe learning difficulties: A radical re-appraisal. London: Croom Helm.
