This article expands the ideas presented in Reid and Valle's essay by further exploring the construct of normality and its implications for children in schools. It examines the reasons for the nature of current school policy and practice by explicating who benefits and who loses from typical school structures and recent national legislation. Finally, it advocates for a transformation of thinking about the purpose of schools and suggests a radical restructuring that would support social reciprocity and community.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achinstein, B. (2002). Community and diversity and conflict among school teachers: The ties that blind. New York: Teachers College Press.
2.
Ansalone, G. (2001). Schooling, tracking, and inequality. Journal of Children andPoverty, 7(1), 33—47.
3.
Armstrong, L. (1993). And they call it help: The psychiatric policing of America's children. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Associated Press. (2003, August 24). Thousands of Florida kids held back because of test. Hoosier Times (Bloomington, IN), p. A10.
4.
Becker, H. (1963) Outsiders. New York: Free Press.
5.
Begala, P. (2000). “Is our children learning?”: The case against Prezident George W. Bush. New York: Simon & Schuster.
6.
Benjamin, S. (2002). The micropolitics of inclusive education: An ethnography. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
7.
Berger, P. (1963). Invitation to sociology. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
8.
Block, A.A. (1997). I'm only bleeding: Education as the practice of violence against children. New York: Peter Lang.
9.
Bochenek, M., & Brown, A.W. (2001). Hatred in the hallways: Violence and discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender students in U.S. schools. New York: Human Rights Watch.
10.
Brandon, K. (2003). Test-prep pressure hits grade schools. In A. Kohn & P. Shannon (Eds.), Education, Inc.: Turning learning into a business (pp. 58—62). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
11.
Brantlinger, E.A. (1993). The politics of social class in secondary schools: Views of afluent and impoverished youth. New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
Brantlinger, E.A. (2003, June). Big glossies: How textbooks structure special education. Paper presented at the Second City Disability and Education Conference, National Louis University, Chicago.
13.
Carbonaro, W.J., & Gamoran, A. (2002). The production of achievement inequality in high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 801—827.
14.
Caplan, P.J. (1995). They say you're crazy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15.
Capshew, J.H. (1999). Psychologists on the march: Science, practice, and professional identity in America, 1929—1969. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Collins, K.M. (2003). Ability profiling and school failure: One child's struggle to be seen as competent. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Colucci, K. (2000). Negative pedagogy. In J. L. Paul & T. J. Smith (Eds.), Stories out of school; Memories and reflections on care and cruelty in the classroom (pp. 27—44). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
18.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Heath.
19.
Dunn, L.M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35, 5—22.
20.
Dweck, C.S. (2002). Beliefs that make smart people dumb. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Why smart people can be so stupid (pp. 24— 41). New Haven: Yale University Press.
21.
Eder, D., Evans, C.C., & Parker, S. (1995). School talk: Gender and adolescent culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
22.
Erikson, E. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
23.
Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1981). Disabled women: Sexism without the pedestal. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 8(2), 233—248.
24.
Fleischer, L.E. (2001). Special education students as counter-hegemonic theorizers. In G. M. Hudak & P. Kihn (Eds.), Labeling: Pedagogy and politics (pp. 115—124). New York: Routledge Falmer
25.
Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic. London : Routledge.
26.
Fraser, N. (2003). Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. London & New York : Verso.
27.
Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Seabury.
28.
Giroux, H.A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Amherst, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
29.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds.). New York: International Publishers. (Original work published 1929—1935)
30.
Harvey-Koelpin, S. (2003, June). The impact of reform on students with disabilities . Paper presented at the Second City Disability and Education Conference, National Louis University, Chicago.
31.
Heller, J. (1955). Catch 22. New York: Simon & Schuster.
32.
Hudak, G.M. (2001). On what is labeled “playing”: Locating the “true” in education. In G. M. Hudak & P. Kihn (Eds.), Labeling: Pedagogy and politics (pp. 9—26). New York : Routledge Falmer.
33.
Kaufman, J.S. (2001). The classroom and labeling: “The girl who stayed back.” In G. M. Hudak & P. Kihn (Eds.), Labeling: Pedagogy and politics (pp. 41—54). New York: Routledge Falmer.
34.
Kohn, A. (2003). Introduction: The 500-pound gorilla. In A. Kohn & P. Shannon (Eds.), Education, Inc.: Turning learning into a business (pp. 1—11). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann .
35.
Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay in abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.
36.
Kutchins, H., & Kirk, S.A. (1997). Making us crazy: DSM: The psychiatric bible and the creation of mental disorders. New York: Free Press.
37.
Labaree, D.F. (1997). How to succeed in school without really learning: The credentials race in American education. New Haven: Yale University Press.
38.
Laungani, P. (1999). Cultural influences on identity and behavior: India and Britain. In Y. T. Lee, C. R. McCauley, & J. G. Draguns (Eds.), Personality and person perception across cultures (pp. 191—212). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39.
Lease, A.M., McFall, R.M., & Viken, R.J. (2003). Distance from peers in the group's perceived organizational structure: Relation to individual characteristics. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23, 194—217.
40.
Leistyna, P. (1999). Presence of mind: Education and the politics of deception. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
41.
Lipsitz, G. (1998). The possessive investment in whiteness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
42.
Luke, C., & Luke, A. (1995). Just naming? Educational discourses and the politics of identity. In W. T. Pink & G. W. Noblit (Eds.), Continuity and contradiction: The futures of the sociology of education (pp. 357— 380). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
43.
Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
44.
McLaren, P., Carrillo-Rowe, A.M., Clark, R.L., & Craft, P.A. (2001). Labeling whiteness: Decentering strategies of white racial domination. In G. M. Hudak & P. Kihn (Eds.), Labeling: Pedagogy and politics (pp. 203—224). New York : Routledge Falmer.
45.
Metcalf, S. (2003). Reading between the lines. In A. Kohn & P. Shannon (Eds.), Education, Inc.: Turning learning into a business (pp. 49—57). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
46.
Miller, M.C. (2001). The Bush dyslexicon: Observations of a national disorder. New York: Norton.
47.
Miner, B. (2003). For-profits target education. In A. Kohn & P. Shannon (Eds.), Education, Inc.: Turning learning into a business (pp. 131—139). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
48.
Moody, J.K. (2003). To be young, pregnant, and black: My life as a welfare coed. In V. C. Adair & S. L. Dahlberg (Eds.), Reclaiming class: Women, poverty, and the promise of higher education in America (pp. 85—96). Philadelphia : Temple University Press.
49.
Morgan, D. (1996). Learning to be a man: Dilemmas and contradictions of masculine experience. In C. Luke (Ed.), Feminisms and pedagogies of everyday life (pp. 103—115). Albany: State University of New York Press.
50.
Morrison, T. (1999). The big box. New York: Hyperion.
51.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq.
52.
Oliver, M. (2004). Changing the social relations of research production . In S. Danforth & S. Taff (Eds.), Crucial readings in special education (pp. 138—147). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
53.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell.
54.
Reynolds, A.J., & Wolfe, B. (1999). Special education and school achievement: An exploratory analysis with a central-city sample. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 249—269.
55.
Rodis, P., Garrod, A., & Boscardin, M.L. (2001). Learning disabilities and life stories. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
56.
Ryan, W. (1971). Blaming the victim. New York : Random House.
57.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation, Vol. II. Oxford: Blackwell.
58.
Schmidt, J. (2000). Disciplined minds: A critical look at salaried professionals and the soul-battering system that shapes their lives. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
59.
Sharp, R., & Green, A. (1975). Education and social control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
60.
Silberman, C. (1971). Crisis in the classroom. New York: Vintage.
61.
Smith, A. (2001). The labeling of African American boys in special education: A case study. In G. M. Hudak & P. Kihn (Eds.), Labeling: Pedagogy and politics (pp. 109—114). New York : Routledge Falmer.
62.
Smith, T.J., & Danforth, S. (2000). Ethics, politics, and the unintended cruelties of teaching. In J. L. Paul & T. J. Smith (Eds.), Stories out of school: Memories and reflections on care and cruelty in the classroom (pp. 129—152). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
63.
Smith, T.J., & Perez, S. (2000). The morals of teachers' stories. In J. L. Paul & T. J. Smith (Eds.), Stories out of school: Memories and reflections on care and cruelty in the classroom (pp. 105—127). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
64.
Stoughton, E. (2003). “I wish I could tell them how I feel”: Sharing the stories of young people labeled ED and their families. Unpublished dissertation, Indiana University.
65.
Swanson, D.P., Cunningham, M., & Spencer, M.B. (2003). Black males' structural conditions, achievement patterns, normative needs and “opportunities.” Journal ofUrban Education, 38, 608—633.
66.
Taylor, S., Rizvi, F., Lingard, B., & Henry, M. (1997). Educational policy and the politics of change . New York: Routledge.
67.
Tomkins, S. (1995). Script theory and nuclear scripts. In E. K. Sedgwick & A. F. Frank (Eds.), Shame and its sisters: A Sylvan Tomkins reader (pp. 179—195). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
68.
Valencia, R. R. (Ed.). (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Washington, DC: Falmer.
69.
Wells, A.S., & Crain, R.L. (1992). Do parents choose school quality or school status? A sociological theory of free market education. Sociology of Education, 65, 616— 618.
70.
Worfel, P. (2003). Friendly fire, collateral damage, and rules of engagement: A casualty of “No Child Left Behind.” Unpublished manuscript. (Available from author, pworfel@ indiana.edu)
71.
Wright, S.E. (1993). Blaming the victim, blaming society, or blaming the discipline: Fixing responsibility for poverty and homelessness. TheSociology Quarterly, 34(1), 1—16.
72.
Young, I.M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
73.
Young, M. (1971). Knowledge and control. London : Macmillan.
