The present study investigated the persistent nature of naming speed deficits within the context of the double-deficit hypothesis in a university sample of adults with reading disabilities (RD). Twenty-five university students with RD were compared to 28 typically achieving readers on measures of reading skill, phonological processing, and naming speed. The results indicated that both naming speed and phonological processing deficits characterized the RD group. In a regression analysis, neither naming speed nor phonological processing were important variables in explaining comprehension when reading rate was in the model. The results of the present study are mixed at best and are consistent with earlier conclusions that support for the double-deficit hypothesis of dyslexia remains limited.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bowers, P.G., & Swanson, L.B. (1991). Naming speed deficits in reading disability: Multiple measures of a singular process. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 195—219.
2.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P.E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419—421.
Bruck, M. (1990). Word recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 439— 454.
5.
Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874—886.
6.
Chiappe, P., Stringer, R., Siegel, L.S., & Stanovich, K.E. (2002). Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults. Reading and Writing, 15, 73—107.
7.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Deeney, T., Wolf, M., & O'Rourke, A.G. (2001). “I like to take my own sweet time”: Case study of a child with naming-speed deficits and reading disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 145— 155.
9.
Denckla, M., & Cutting, L. (1999). History and significance of rapid automatized naming. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 29—42.
10.
Denckla, M.B., & Rudel, R. (1974). Rapid “automatized” naming of pictured objects, colors, letters, and numbers by normal children. Cortex, 10, 186—202.
11.
Denckla, M.B., & Rudel, R. (1976a). Naming of object-drawing by dyslexic and other learning disabled children. Brain andLanguage, 3, 1—15.
12.
Denckla, M.B., & Rudel, R. (1976b). Rapid “automatized” naming (RAN): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471—479.
13.
Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test—Revised . Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
14.
Fawcett, A.J., & Nicolson, R.I. (1994). Naming speed in children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 641—646.
Korhonen, T.T. (1995). The persistence of rapid naming problems in children with reading disabilities: A nine-year follow-up. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 232— 239.
17.
Lovett, M.W., Steinbach, K.A., & Frijters, J.C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 334—358.
18.
Lundberg, I., & Hφien, T. (1989). Phonemic deficits: A core symptom of developmental dyslexia?Irish Journal of Psychology , 10, 579—592.
19.
Lyon, G.R., Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A., Torgesen, J.K., Wood, F.B., et al. (2001). Rethinking learning disabilities. In C. E. Finn, A. J. Rotherham, & C. R. Hokanson (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 259— 287). Washington, DC: Fordham Foundation.
20.
Manis, F.R., Doi, L.M., & Bhadha, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33, 325—333, 374.
21.
McBride-Chang, C., & Manis, F.R. (1996). Structural invariance in the associations of naming speed, phonological awareness, and verbal reasoning in good and poor readers: A test of the double deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 323—339.
Pennington, B.F., Cardoso-Martins, C., Green, P.A., & Lefly, D. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypotheses for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 707—755.
27.
Pennington, B.F., Van Orden, G.C., Smith, S.D., Green, P.A., & Haith, M.M. (1990). Phonological processing skills and deficits in adult dyslexics. Child Development, 61, 1753—1778.
28.
Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C., Francis, D., Foorman, B., & Fletcher, J. (2002). Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: Implications for the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 245—256.
29.
Shafrir, U., & Siegel, L.S. (1994). Subtypes of learning disabilities in adolescents and adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 123—134.
30.
Snowling, M., Nation, K., Moxham, P., Gallagher, A., & Frith, U. (1997). Phonological processing skills of dyslexic students in higher education: A preliminary report. Journal of Research in Reading, 20, 31— 41.
31.
Stanovich, K.E. (1992). Speculations on the causes and consequences of individual differences in early reading development. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 307—342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
Sunseth, K., & Bowers, P.G. (2002). Rapid naming and phonemic awareness: Contributions to reading, spelling and orthographic knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 401—429.
33.
Thomas, D.R. (1992). Interpreting discriminant functions: A data analytic approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 335— 362.
34.
Thomas, D.R., Hughes, E., & Zumbo, B.D. (1998). On variable importance in linear regression. Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 45, 253— 275.
35.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second-to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161—185.
36.
Wagner, R.K., & Torgesen, J.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin,101, 192—212.
37.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology , 30, 73—87.
38.
Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale—Revised . New York: Psychological Corp.
39.
Wilkinson, G.S. (1993). The wide range achievement Test (3rd ed.). Wilmington, DE: Jastak.
40.
Wilson, A.M., & Lesaux, N.K. (2001). Persistence of phonological processing deficits in college students with ageappropriate reading skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 394—400.
41.
Wolf, M. (1999). What time may tell: Towards a new conceptualization of developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia,
42.
3—28. Wolf, M., Bally, H., & Morris, R. (1986). Automaticity, retrieval processes, and reading: A longitudinal study in average and impaired readers . Child Development, 57, 988—1000.
43.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P.G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415—438.
44.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P.G. (2000). Naming-speed processes and developmental reading disabilities: An introduction to the special issue on the double-deficit hypothesis . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 322—324.
45.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P.G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387—407.
