Adolescents with word-reading skills below grade level were randomly assigned to one of three conditions. Those receiving interventions practiced reading 100 multisyllabic words, either by analyzing graphosyllabic units in the words or by reading the words as unanalyzed wholes. The third group received no special instruction. Posttests revealed that graphosyllabic instruction helped students to decode novel words, remember how to read words with practice, and remember the spellings of words when compared to controls. In contrast, whole-word instruction yielded no benefit on transfer tasks compared to controls. Effects were observed primarily among adolescents reading at a third-grade—equivalent level and less so at a fourth- and fifth-grade—equivalent level. Results are consistent with a connectionist view of word learning and indicate the importance of providing struggling readers with instruction and practice in how to fully analyze the graphosyllabic constituents of words.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baumann, J. (1988). Reading assessment: An instructional decision-making perspective. Columbus, OH: Merrill .
2.
Birsh, J. (Ed.). (1999). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills. Baltimore : Brookes.
3.
Bruck, M. (1993). Component spelling skills of college students with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 171—184.
4.
Canney, G., & Schreiner, R. (1976—1977). A study of the effectiveness of selected syllabication rules and phonogram patterns for word attack. Reading Research Quarterly, 12, 102—124.
5.
Chall, J.S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6.
Cox, A., & Hutcheson, L. (1988). Syllable division: A prerequisite of dyslexics' literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 226—242.
7.
Cunningham, P. (1979). A compare/contrast theory of mediated word identification . The Reading Teacher, 32, 774—778.
8.
Cunningham, P., Cunningham, J., & Rystrom, R. (1981). A new syllabication strategy and reading achievement . Reading World, 20, 208—214.
9.
Drake, D., & Ehri, L. (1984). Spelling acquisition: Effects of pronouncing words on memory for their spellings. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 297—320.
10.
Ehri, L. (1980). The development of orthographic images. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 311—338). London: Academic Press.
11.
Ehri, L. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 383— 417). New York: Longman.
12.
Ehri, L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107—143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
Ehri, L. (1994). Development of the ability to read words: Update . In R. Ruddell, M. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
14.
Ehri, L. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In C. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory and practice across languages (pp. 237—269). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Ehri, L. (1998). Grapheme—phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. Metsala & L. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3—40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Ehri, L., Nunes, S., Stahl, S., & Willows, D. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393—447.
17.
Ehri, L., & Saltmarsh, J. (1995). Beginning readers outperform older disabled readers in learning to read words by sight. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 295—326.
18.
Gillingham, A., & Stillman, B. (1997). The Gillingham manual: Remedial training for children with specific disability in reading, writing, and penmanship (8th ed.). Cam-bridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.
19.
Greenberg, D., Ehri, L., & Perin, D. (1997). Are word reading processes the same or different in adult literacy students and 3rd-5th graders matched for reading level?Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 262—288.
20.
Harm, M., & Seidenberg, M. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491—528.
21.
Harris, A., & Jacobson, M. (1972). Basic elementary reading vocabularies. New York: Macmillan.
22.
IJzendoorn, M., & Bus, A. (1994). Meta-analytic confirmation of the nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia. Reading Research Quarterly , 29, 267— 288.
23.
Johnson, D., & Baumann, J. (1984). Word identification. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 583—608). New York: Longman.
24.
Mewhort, D., & Beal, A. (1977). Mechanisms of word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 629—640.
25.
Perfetti, C. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition . In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107—143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
Rack, J., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Wight-man, J. (1994). The role of phonology in young children learning to read words: The direct-mapping hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 42—71.
27.
Rack, J., Snowling, M., & Olson, R. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 29—53.
28.
Reitsma, P. (1983). Printed word learning in beginning readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75, 321—339.
29.
Scheerer-Neumann, G. (1981). The utilization of intraword structure in poor readers: Experimental evidence and a training program. Psychological Research, 43, 155— 178.
30.
Share, D. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151—218.
31.
Shefelbine, J. (1990). A syllabic-unit approach to teaching decoding of polysyllabic words to fourth- and sixth-grade disabled readers. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Literacy theory and research: Analysis from multiple paradigms (pp. 223—230). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
32.
Shefelbine, J., & Calhoun, J. (1991). Variability in approaches to identifying polysyllabic words: A descriptive study of sixth graders with highly, moderately, and poorly developed syllabication strategies. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Learner factors/teacher factors: Issues in literacy research and instruction (pp. 169— 177). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
33.
Shefelbine, J., Lipscomb, L., & Hern, A. (1989). Variables associated with second, fourth, and sixth grade students' ability to identify polysyllabic words. In S. McCormick & J. Zutell (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction (pp. 145—149). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
34.
Swanson, H. (2000). What instruction works for students with learning disabilities? Summarizing the results from a meta-analysis of intervention studies. In R. Gersten, E. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 1—30). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
Swanson, H., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277—321.
36.
Treiman, R., Bowey, J., & Bourassa, D. (2002, June). Segmentation of spoken words into syllables by English-speaking children as compared to adults. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Chicago, IL.
37.
Wentink, H., Van Bon, W., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Training of poor readers' phonological decoding skills: Evidence for syllable-bound processing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 163—192.
38.
Woodcock, R. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
