Science and scientific thinking have not made a substantial impact on educational practice. In this discussion, we examine the relationship between science and education and delineate four reasons for characterizing science as an uninvited guest in schools: (a) Science is not highly regarded in society; (b) good science and bad science are often mistaken for one another; (c) the amount of current data is overwhelming; and (d) science is not easy for those who practice it (researchers), those who translate it (teacher educators), or those who consume it (teachers). We suggest several strategies to improve this relationship, including promoting standards of educational practice, emphasizing the role of teacher educators as translators of the research base into classroom practice, and linking student outcomes with the use of effective instructional practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott, M., Walton, C., Tapia, Y., & Greenwood, C.R. (1999). Research to practice: A “blueprint” for closing the gap in local schools. Exceptional Children , 65, 339—352.
2.
Biederman, G.B., Davey, V.A., Ryder, C., & Franchi, D. (1994). The negative effects of positive reinforcement in teaching children with developmental delay. Exceptional Children, 60, 458—465.
3.
Biederman, G.B., & Davey, V.A. (1995). Counterpoint: Practice versus process— Rigidity of reinforcement requirements results in regressive research: A reply to Ward . Exceptional Children, 61, 493—497.
4.
Cameron, J., & Pierce, W.D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64, 363—423.
5.
Carnine, D. (1995). Trustworthiness, useability, and accessibility of educational research. Journal of BehavioralEducation, 5, 251—258.
6.
Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513—521.
7.
Cook, B. G., & Schirmer, B. R. (Eds.). (2003). What is special about special education? [Special issue]. The Journal of Special Education, 37.
8.
Fordham Foundation. (1999). The teachers we need and how to get more of them. Washington, DC: Author .
9.
Forness, S.R., Kavale, K.A., Blum, I.M., & Lloyd, J.W. (1997). Mega-analysis of meta-analyses: What works in special education and related services. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(6), 4—9.
10.
Gallagher, D. (1998). The scientific knowledge base of special education: Do we know what we think we know?Exceptional Children, 64, 493—502.
11.
Gersten, R. (2001). Sorting out the roles of research in the improvement of practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 16, 45—50.
12.
Gersten, R., Vaughn, S., Deshler, D., & Schiller, E. (1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 466— 476.
13.
Gersten, R., Schiller, E. P., & Vaughn, S. (Eds.). (2000). Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Greenwood, C.R., & Maheady, L. (2001). Are future teachers aware of the gap between research and practice and what should they know?Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 333—347.
15.
Kauffman, J.M. (1996). Research to practice issues. Behavioral Disorders, 22, 55—60.
16.
Kauffman, J.M. (2002). Education deform: Bright people sometimes say stupid things about education. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
17.
Kauffman, J.M., Bantz, J., & McCullough, J. (2002). Separate and better: A special public school class for students with emotional and behavioral disorders . Exceptionality, 10, 149—170.
18.
Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards. New York : Houghton Mifflin.
19.
Landrum, T.J. (1997). Why data don't matter. Journal of BehavioralEducation, 7, 123— 129.
20.
Landrum, T.J., Cook, B.G., Tankersley, M., & Fitzgerald, S. (2002). Teacher perceptions of the trustworthiness, useability, and accessibility of information from different sources. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 42—48.
21.
Landrum, T.J., Tankersley, M., & Kauffman, J.M. (in press). What's special about special education for students with emotional or behavioral disorders?The Journal of Special Education.
22.
Lloyd, J.W., Forness, S.R., & Kavale, K.A. (1998). Some methods are more effective. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33, 195— 200.
23.
McCormick, A.W., Whitney, C.G., Farley, M.M., Lynfield, R., Harrison, L.H., Ben-nett, N.M., et al. (2003). Geographic diversity and temporal trends of antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States . Nature Medicine, 9, 424—430.
24.
Sagan, C. (1996). The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. New York: Random House .
25.
Salkind, A.R., Cuddy, P.G., & Foxworth, J.W. (2001). Is this patient allergic to penicillin? An evidence-based analysis of the likelihood of penicillin allergy. Journal of theAmerican Medical Association, 285, 2498—2505.
26.
Sasso, G. (2001). The retreat from inquiry and knowledge in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 178—193. Vaughn , S., & Dammann, J.E. (2001). Science and sanity in special education. Behavioral Disorders , 27, 21—29.
27.
Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., & Chard, D. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99— 114.
28.
Vaughn, S.R., Hughes, M.T., Schumm, J.S., & Klingner, J. (1998). A collaborative effort to enhance reading and writing instruction in inclusion classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21, 57—74.
29.
Walker, H.M., Forness, S.R., Kauffman, J.K., Epstein, M.H., Gresham, F.M., Nelson, C.M., et al. (1998). Macro-social validation: Referencing outcomes in behavioral disorders to societal issues and problems. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 7—18.
30.
Ward, P.C. (1995). A response to “The negative effects of positive reinforcement in teaching children with developmental delays.” Exceptional Children, 61, 489—492.
