This study examined the relationships between mathematical learning difficulties (MLD) and the planning, attention, simultaneous, successive (PASS) theory of cognitive processing. The Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) was used to measure the PASS processes for a group of 267 Dutch students with MLD who attended either general or special education. The results showed that students with MLD performed lower than their peers on all CAS scales and that the MLD group contained many students with cognitive weaknesses in planning or successive processing. Moreover, students who had specific difficulties with the acquisition of basic math facts, the automatization of such facts, or word-problem solving were found to have distinct PASS cognitive profiles. In order to investigate the relationships between cognitive abilities and improvement in the mastery of basic math facts and problem solving, 165 of the students with MLD were given a special multiplication intervention. It appeared that the effectiveness of this particular intervention did not differ across the groups of students with specific cognitive weaknesses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Das , J.P., Naglieri, J.A., & Kirby, J.R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: The PASS theory of intelligence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
Davis, J.T., Parr, G., & Lan, W. (1997). Differences between learning disability subtypes classified using the revised Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 346—352.
3.
Geary, D.C., Hanson, C.O., & Hoard, M.K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236—263.
4.
Ginsburg, H.P. (1997). Mathematics learning disabilities: A view from developmental psychology. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 30, 20—33.
5.
Jordan, N., & Hanich, L.B. (2000). Mathematical thinking in second-grade children with different forms of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33, 567—578.
6.
Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (1983). Interpretive manual for the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
7.
Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (2001). Assessment of specific learning disabilities in the new millennium: Issues, conflicts, and controversies. In A. S. Kaufman & N. L. Kaufman (Eds.), Specific learning disabilities and difficulties in children and adolescents: Psychological assessment and evaluation (pp. 433—461). New York: Cam-bridge University Press.
8.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (2000). What definitions of learning disabilities say and don't say. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 239—257.
9.
Kroesbergen, E.H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2002a). Towards a Dutch version of the Cognitive Assessment System (internal report). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University, ISED
10.
Kroesbergen, E.H., & Van Luit, J.E.H. (2002b). Teaching multiplication to low math performers: Guided versus structured instruction. Instructional Science, 30, 361—378.
11.
Kroesbergen, E.H., Van Luit, J.E.H., Van der Ben, E., Leuven, N., & Vermeer, A. (2000). Meten van intelligentie bij kinderen met ADHD [Measuring intelligence in children with ADHD]. Tijdschrift voor Orthopedagogiek, Kinderpsychiatrie en Klinische Kinderpsychologie, 25, 168—179.
12.
Mercer, C.D. (1997). Students with learning disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice Hall.
13.
Naglieri, J.A. (1999). Essentials of CAS assessment. New York: Wiley.
14.
Naglieri, J.A. (2000). Can profile analysis of ability test scores work? An illustration using the PASS theory and CAS with an unselected cohort. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 419—433.
15.
Naglieri, J.A. (2001). Using the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) with learning disabled children. In A. S. Kaufman & N. L. Kaufman (Eds.), Specific learning disabilities and difficulties in children and adolescents: Psychological assessment and evaluation (pp. 141—177). New York : Cam-bridge University Press.
Naglieri, J.A., & Gottling, S.H. (1995). A cognitive education approach to math instruction for the learning disabled: An individual study. Psychological Reports, 76, 1343—1354.
19.
Naglieri, J.A., & Gottling, S.H. (1997). Mathematics instruction and PASS cognitive processes: An intervention study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 513— 520.
20.
Naglieri, J.A., & Johnson, D. (2000). Effectiveness of a cognitive strategy intervention in improving arithmetic computation based on the PASS theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 591—597.
21.
Siegel, L.S. (1999). Issues in the definition and diagnosis of learning disabilities: A perspective on Guckenberger v. Boston University. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 304—319.
22.
Stanovich, K.E. (1999). The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 350—361.
23.
Van Luit, J.E.H., Kaskens, J., & Van der Krol, R. (1993). Speciaal rekenhulpprogramma vermenigvuldigen en verdelen [Special remediating program multiplication and division]. Doetinchem, the Netherlands: Graviant.
24.
Van Luit, J.E.H., & Kroesbergen, E.H. (1999). Leren vermenigvuldigen: Eigen inbreng of directe instructie? [Multiplication learning: Own contributions or direct instruction?]. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University.
25.
Van Luit, J.E.H., & Naglieri, J.A. (1999). Effectiveness of the MASTER strategy training program for teaching special children multiplication and division. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 98—107.
26.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
27.
Woodcock, R.W., & Johnson, M.B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Revised Tests of Achievement: Standard and supplemental batteries. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
