We evaluated community general education (CGE; n = 178), community special education (CSE; n = 30) and hospital-referred (HR, n = 145) children (ages 7-6 to 11-11) prospectively over a 2-year period. During this period, 17 CGE children were referred for evaluation (community referred; CR). Prior to referral, CR children performed more poorly than community-nonreferred (CNR) children on cognitive ability, academic achievement, attention problems, and information processing. CR group performance was equivalent to that of CSE and HR groups, but HR children showed poorer academic achievement. Referred children performed more poorly on all measures than nonreferred, whether they met formal diagnostic criteria for a learning disorder or not. Learning disorders may be better conceptualized as a context-dependent problem of functional adaptation than as a disability analogous to physical disabilities, raising questions about the validity of using psychometric test scores as the criterion for identification.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aloyzy-Zera, D. (2001). A reconceptualization of learning disabilities via a self-organizing systems paradigm. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 79—94.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author .
3.
Barkley, R. (1998). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
4.
Bernstein, J.H. (2000). Developmental neuropsychological assessment. In K. O. Yeates, M. D. Ris, H. G. Taylor (Eds.), Pediatric neuropsychology: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 405—438). New York: Guilford Press.
5.
Bernstein, J.H., & Waber, D.P. (1997). Pediatric neuropsychological assessment. In T. E. Feinberg & M. Farah (Eds.), Behavioral neurology and neuropsychology (pp. 729—736). New York: McGraw-Hill.
6.
Bocian, K.M., Beebe, M.E., MacMillan, D.L., & Gresham, F.M. (1999). Competing paradigms in learning disabilities classification by schools and the variations in the meaning of discrepant achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 1—14.
7.
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Coutinho, M.J. (1995). Who will be learning disabled after the reauthorization of IDEA? Two very distinct perspectives. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 664— 668.
9.
Curran, T. (1998). Implicit sequence learning from a cognitive neuroscience perspective: What, how and where? In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 365—399). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Denckla, M.B., & Rudel, R.G. (1976). Rapid “automatized” naming (RAN): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471—479.
11.
Farnham-Diggory, S. (1986). Time, now, for a little serious complexity. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (Vol. I, pp. 123—158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S., Shankweiler, D.P., Katz, L., Liberman, I.Y., Stuebing, K.K., et al. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability. Comparison of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6—23.
13.
Frankenberger, W., & Fronzaglio, K. (1991). A review of states' criteria and procedures for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 495—500.
14.
Gaddes, W.H. (1976). Prevalence estimates and the need for definition of learning disabilities. In R. M. Knights & D. J. Bakker (Eds.), The neuropsychology of learning disorders (pp. 3—24). Baltimore : University Park Press.
15.
Gottlieb, J., Alter, M., Gottlieb, B.W., & Wishner, J. (1994). Special education in urban America: It's not justifiable for many. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 453—465.
16.
Gresham, F.M., MacMillan, D.L., & Bocian, K.M. (1998). Agreement between school study team decisions and authoritative definitions in classification of students at-risk for mild disabilities. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 181—191.
17.
Holmes-Bernstein, J.M., & Waber, D.P. (1990). Developmental neuropsychological assessment: The systemic approach. In A. A. Boulton, G. B. Baker, & M. His-cock (Eds.), Neuromethods: Vol. 17, Neuropsychology (pp. 311—371). Clifton, NJ: Humana Press.
18.
Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N. (1990). Kaufman brief intelligence test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
19.
Kavale, K.A., & Reese, J.H. (1992). The character of learning disabilities: An Iowa profile. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 74—94.
20.
Kirk, S. (1962). Educating exceptional children. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
Korkman, M., Kirk, U., & Kemp, S. (1997). NEPSY. New York: Psychological Corp.
22.
Lester, G., & Kelman, M. (1997). State disparities in the diagnosis and placement of pupils with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 599—607.
23.
Lyon, G.R. (1995). Research initiatives in learning disabilities: Contributions from scientists supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Journal ofChild Neurology, 10, 5120—5126.
24.
MacMillan, D.L., Gresham, F.M., & Bocian, K.M. (1998). Discrepancy between definitions of learning disabilities and school practices: An empirical investigation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 314— 326.
25.
MacMillan, D.L., & Speece, D.L. (1999). Utility of current diagnostic categories for research and practice. In R. Gallimore & L. P. Bernheimer (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on children with high-incidence disabilities (pp. 111—133). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
McKinney, J.D., Osborne, S.S., & Schulte, A.C. (1993). Academic consequences of learning disability: Longitudinal prediction of outcomes at 11 years of age. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,8, 19— 27.
27.
Morgan, A.E., Harris, N.S., Bernstein, J.H., & Waber, D.P. (2000). Characteristics of children with adequate academic achievement scores referred for evaluation of school difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 489—500.
28.
Morris, R.D., Stuebing, K.K., Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Lyon, G.R., Shankweiler, D.P., et al. (1998). Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology , 90, 347—373.
29.
Reynolds, C.R., & Kamphaus, R.W. (1992). Behavior assessment system for children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
30.
Rudel, R.G. (1980). Learning disability diagnosis by exclusion and discrepancy. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 19, 547—569.
31.
Shaywitz, B.A., Fletcher, J.M., Holahan, J.M., & Shaywitz, S.E. (1992). Discrepancy compared to low achievement definitions of reading disability: Results from the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 639—648.
32.
Singer-Harris, N.S., Forbes, P., Weiler, M.D., Bellinger, D., & Waber, D.P. (2001). Information processing deficiencies in children with adequate achievement referred for evaluation of school difficulties. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 593—603.
33.
Stanovich, K.E., & Siegel, L.S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24—53.
34.
Stuebing, K.K., Fletcher, J.M., LeDoux, J.M., Lyon, G.R., Shaywitz, S.E., & Shaywitz, B.A. (2002). Validity of IQdiscrepancy classification of reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 469—518.
35.
Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain andLanguage, 9, 182—198.
36.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
37.
Waber, D.P., Marcus, D., Forbes, P., Bellinger, D., Weiler, M.D., & Curran, T.C. (2002). Motor sequence learning and reading ability: Is poor reading associated with sequence deficits? Unpublished manuscript, Children's Hospital, Boston.
38.
Waber, D.P., Weiler, M.D., Bellinger, D., Marcus, D.H., Forbes, P., Wypij, D., et al. (2000). Diminished motor timing control in children referred for diagnosis of learning problems. Developmental Neurospychology, 17, 181—197.
39.
Wechsler, D. (1992). Wechsler individual achievement test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
40.
Weiler, M.D., Bellinger, D., Marmor, J., Rancier, S., & Waber, D.P. (1999). Mother and teacher reports of ADHD symptoms: DSM-IV questionnaire data. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 1139—1147.
41.
Weiler, M.D., Bellinger, D., Simmons, E., Rappaport, L., Urion, D.K., Mitchell, W., et al. (2000). Reliability and validity of a DSM-IV based ADHD screener. Child Neuropsychology, 6, 3—23.
42.
Weiler, M.D., Bernstein, J.H., Bellinger, D.C., & Waber, D.P. (2000). Processing speed in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Inattentive Type. Child Neuropsychology , 6, 218—234.
43.
Weiler, M.D., Bernstein, J.H., Bellinger, D.C., & Waber, D.P. (2002). Patterns of information processing in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, inattentive type and reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 448— 461.
44.
Weiler, M.D., Singer-Harris, N., Marcus, D.H., Bellinger, D., Kosslyn, S., & Waber, D.P. (2000). Speed of information processing in children referred for learning problems as measured by a visual filtering test. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 538—550.
45.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P.G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415—438.
46.
Wolff, P.H., Michel, G.F., Ovrut, M., & Drake, C. (1990). Rate and timing precision of motor coordination in developmental dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 349—359.
47.
Wolraich, M.L., Hannah, J.N., Baumgartel, A., & Feurer, I.D. (1998). Examination of DSM-IV criteria for attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder in a country-wide sample. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 19, 162—168.
