This study was designed to examine the role of intelligence (IQ) in the definition of reading disabilities (RD) in languages with different orthographic systems. A sample of 94 Spanish children and 157 English-speaking Canadian children with RD was classified into four groups on the basis of IQ scores from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised (< 80; 81—90; 91—109; 110—140). We examined the reading and spelling skills of Canadian and Spanish children as a function of Full Scale, Verbal, and Performance IQ scores. Significant differences between the languages were found when reading performance was analyzed as a function of Verbal IQ scores, in that there were some differences between the groups of Canadian children with RD but not between the groups of Spanish children. The Canadian children with Verbal IQ scores < 80 demonstrated relatively lower performance in reading and spelling skills than the Canadian groups with higher IQ scores. There were differences in reading tasks as a function of Performance IQ in English but not in Spanish. The differences in the role of IQ as a function of orthographic systems may relate to the greater significance of visual—orthographic as opposed to phonological processing in English.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnold, L.E., Barneby, N., McNamus, J., Smeltzer, D.J., Conrad, A., Winer, G., et al. (1977). Prevention by specific perceptual remediation for vulnerable first-graders. Archives of General Psychiatry,34, 1279—1294.
2.
Backman, J., Bruck, M., Herbert, M., & Seidenberg, M. (1984). Acquisition and use of spelling—sound correspondences in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 114—133.
3.
Baluch, B., & Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 644—652.
4.
Bishop, D.V.M., & Butterworth, G.E. (1980). Verbal—performance discrepancies: Relationship to birth risk and specific reading retardation . Cortex, 16, 375— 389.
5.
Bryson, S.E., & Werker, J.F. (1989). Toward understanding the problems in severely disabled readers: Part I. Vowel errors. Applied Psycholinguistics , 10, 1—12.
6.
Cuetos, F. (1989). Lectura y escritura de palabras a través de la ruta fonológica [Reading and spelling using a phonological route]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 45, 71— 84.
7.
Das, J.P., Mensink, D., & Mishra, R.K. (1990). Cognitive processes separating good and poor readers when IQ is covaried. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 423—436.
8.
Foltz, G. S., & Poltrock, S. E. (Eds.). (1987). All purpose tester, PC version (APT PC). An experiment development system. (Available from Gregory Foltz and Steven Poltrock).
9.
Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multidimensional comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104—115.
10.
Goldman, R., Fristoe, M., & Woodcock, R.W. (1974). GFW Sound-symbol tests . Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
11.
Graham, S.A., & Kline, R.B. (1991). IQ differences among poor readers: Do they matter? Unpublished manuscript, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec.
12.
Humphries, T., & Bone, J. (1993). Use of IQ criteria for evaluating the uniqueness of the learning disability profile. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 5, 348—351.
13.
Jastak, J., & Jastak, S. (1978). The wide range achievement test. Wilmington, DE: Jastak.
14.
Jiménez, J.E., & Rodrigo, M. (1994). Is it true that the differences in reading performance between students with and without LD cannot be explained by IQ?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 155— 163.
15.
Johnston, R.S., Rugg, M.D., & Scott, T. (1987). The influence of phonology on good and poor readers when reading for meaning. Journal of Memory andLanguage, 26, 57—68.
16.
Johnston, R.S., Rugg, M.D., & Scott, T. (1988). Pseudohomophone effects in 8 and 11 year old good and poor readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 11, 110—132.
17.
Morais, J. (1995). Do orthographic and phonological peculiarities of alphabetically swritten languages influence the course of literacy acquisition ?Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 1—7.
18.
Perfetti, C.A., Bell, L.C., & Delaney, S.M. (1988). Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 59—70.
19.
Rodrigo, M., & Jiménez, J.E. (2000). IQ vs. phonological decoding skill in explaining differences between poor readers and normal readers in word recognition: Evidence from a naming task. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 129—142
20.
Sebastián, N. (1991). Reading by analogy in a shallow orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 471—477.
21.
Seidenberg, M.S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1—30.
22.
Share, D.L., Jorm, A.F., Matthews, R., & McLean, R. (1988). Lexical decision and naming times of young disabled readers with function and content words. Australian Journal of Psychology, 40, 11—18.
23.
Share, D.L., Jorm, A.F., McGee, R., Silva, P.A., McLean, R., Matthews, R., et al. (1987). Dyslexia and other myths. Unpublished manuscript, University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand.
24.
Share, D.L., & Silva, P.A. (1987). Language deficits and specific reading retardation: Cause or effect?British Journal of Disorders of Communication , 22, 219—226.
25.
Siegel, L.S. (1988). Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 201—215.
26.
Siegel, L.S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469—478.
27.
Siegel, L.S. (1990). IQ and learning disabilities: R.I.P. In H. L. Swanson & B. Keogh (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Theoretical and research issues (pp. 111—128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
Siegel, L.S. (1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 618—629.
29.
Siegel, L.S., & Faux, D. (1989). Acquisition of certain grapheme—phoneme correspondences in normally achieving disabled readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 37—52.
30.
Siegel, L.S., & Himel, N. (in press). Socio-economic status, age and the classification of dyslexics and poor readers: The dangers of using IQ scores in the definition of reading disability. Dyslexia.
31.
Siegel, L.S., & Ryan, E.B. (1988). Development of grammatical sensitivity, phonological, and short term memory skills in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 24, 28—37.
32.
Signorini, A. (1997). Word reading in Spanish: A comparison between skilled and less skilled beginning readers. Applied Psycholinguistics , 18, 319—344.
33.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360— 407.
34.
Toro, J., & Cervera, M. (1980). Test de análisis de lectoescritura [Reading and spelling test]. Madrid: Aprendizaje Visor.
35.
Valtin, R. (1978—1979). Dyslexia: Deficit in reading or deficit in research?Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 201—221.
36.
Venezky, R.L. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton.
37.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
38.
Wechsler, D. (1989). Escala de inteligencia de Wechsler para niños [Wechsler intelligence scale for children]. Madrid: TEA.
39.
Werker, J.F., Bryson, S.E., & Wassenberg, K. (1989). Toward understanding the problem in severely disabled readers. Part II: Consonant errors. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 13—30.
40.
Woodcock, R.W. (1973). Woodcock reading mastery test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
