In this study, we examined whether think-aloud procedures would uncover differences in the kinds of inferences generated by average and below-average readers. Participants were 40 third-grade children who were divided into groups of average and below-average readers. All participants completed measures of nonverbal IQ, reading, language, and working memory, and a story comprehension task that consisted of two conditions: listen through and think aloud. The major findings in this study were that (a) average readers generated significantly more explanatory inferences than below-average readers, and (b) comprehension performance as measured by story recall was significantly better for both groups in the think-aloud condition than in the listen-through condition. The discussion addresses the implications of these findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brown, L., Sherbenou, R., & Johnsen, S. (1998). Test of nonverbal intelligence (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
2.
Crain-Thoreson, C., Lippman, M., & McClendon-Magnuson, D. (1997). Windows on comprehension: Reading comprehension processes as revealed by two think aloud procedures . Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 579—591.
3.
Crais, E., & Chapman, R. (1987). Story recall and inferencing skills in language/ learning disabled and nondisabled children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 50—55.
4.
Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1998). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-3. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance.
5.
Gottardo, A., Stanovich, K., & Siegel, L. (1996). The relationship between phonological sensitivity, syntactic processing, and verbal working memory in the reading performance of third grade children. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology , 63, 563—582.
6.
Graesser, A., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371—395.
7.
Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 95, 163—182.
8.
Kucan, L., & Beck, I. (1997). Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research: Inquiry, instruction, and social interaction. Review of Educational Research, 67, 271— 299.
9.
Laing, S., & Kamhi, A. (1998). [Think-aloud data in third-grade skilled readers] . Unpublished raw data.
10.
Long, D., Oppy, B., & Seely, M. (1994). Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 6, 1456—1470.
11.
Lyon, G. (1995). Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 4, 3—30.
12.
Magliano, J. (1999). Revealing inference processes during text comprehension . In Susan R. Goldman, Arthur C. Graesser, and Paul van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality and coherence. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440—466.
14.
Oakhill, J. (1982). Constructive processes in skilled and less skilled comprehenders' memory for sentences. British Journal of Psychology , 73, 13—20.
15.
Oakhill, J. (1984). Inferential and memory skills in children's comprehension of stories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 31—39.
16.
Raygor, A. (1977). The Raygor readability estimate: A quick and easy way to determine difficulty. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Reading: Theory, research and practice (pp. 259—263.). Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference .
17.
Suh , S. (1989). Causal inferences during text comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Chicago.
18.
Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. (1996a). Conscious understanding during comprehension . Discourse Processes, 21, 255— 287.
19.
Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. (1996b). How do children understand what they read and what can we do to help them? In M. Graves , P. Van den Brock, & B. Taylor (Eds.), The first R: Every child's right to read. New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
Wiederholt, T., & Bryant, B. (1992). Gray oral reading test (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
21.
Wiig, E., Semel, E., & Secord, W. (1995). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
22.
Woodcock, R. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery test—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service .
23.
Zwaan, R., & Brown, C. (1996). The influence of language proficiency and comprehension skill on situation model construction. Discourse Processes , 21, 289— 327.
