This study investigated the relative importance of semantic, grammatical, phonological, and rapid naming abilities in predicting word identification in a large, representative sample of children enrolled in first through sixth grade, using correlation, factor analysis, multiple regression, and predictive outcome analysis techniques. Composite measures of these abilities were found to correlate significantly with word identification, even after controlling for the effects of nonverbal intelligence. Factor analysis indicated that the spoken language composites and the word identification composite loaded on one factor, whereas the perceptual speed composites loaded on a second factor. Multiple regression analyses showed that among younger children in the early stages of learning to read and children whose word identifying skills were below average, the phonology and rapid naming composites accounted for the most variance in predicting word identification skills. Among older children and children who were proficient in word identification, the semantics composite accounted for the most variance. The most important analyses in this study (i.e., the calculations of the sensitivity indexes, the specificity indexes, and the positive predictive values) evaluated the practical value of using the composites to predict poor word identification skills in children. To be considered practically useful, all predictive outcome values had to be .75 or greater. None of the composites studied, including an application of the double-deficit hypothesis, met this criterion. The results from this study question the accuracy and utility of using any of the abilities studied to predict which students are at risk for or have poor word identification skills.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aaron, P.G., Joshi, M., & Williams, K.A. (1999). Not all reading disabilities are alike. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 120-137.
2.
Ackerman, P.T., & Dykman, R.A. (1993). Phonological processes, immediate memory, and confrontational naming in dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 26, 597-609.
3.
Ackerman, P.T., Holloway, C.A., Youngdahl, P.L., & Dykman, R.A. (2001). The double-deficit theory of reading disability does not fit all. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 16, 152-160.
4.
Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
5.
Bernstein, J.H., & Weiler, M.D. (2000). "Pediatric neuropsychological assessment" examined . In G. Goldstein & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment (3rd ed., pp. 263-300). Kidlington, UK: Pergamon.
6.
Bowers, P.G., Golden, J., Kennedy, A., & Young, A. (1994). Limits upon orthographic knowledge due to processes indexed by naming speed. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge I. Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 173-218). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
7.
Bowers, P.G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links between naming speed, precise timing mechanism and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 5, 69-85.
8.
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Reprinted from the Handbook on research on teaching. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association .
10.
Carran, D.T., & Scott, K.G. (1992). Risk assessment in preschool children: Research implications for the early detection of educational handicaps. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 196-211.
11.
Catts, H.W., Fey, M.E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J.B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities . Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 331-361.
12.
Catts, H.W., Fey, M.E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J.B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 38-50.
Felton, R.H., & Brown, I.S. (1990). Phonological processes as predictors of specific reading skills in children at risk for reading failure. Reading and Writing, 2, 39-59.
15.
Flynn, J., & Rahbar, M.H. (1998). Kindergarten screening for risk of reading failure . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 15-35.
16.
Gredler, G.R. (1997). Issues in early childhood screening and assessment . Psychology in the Schools, 34(2), 99-106.
17.
Gredler, G.R. (2000). Early childhood screening for developmental and educational problems. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), The psychoeducational assessment of preschool children (pp. 399-411). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
18.
Guilford, J.P. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York : McGraw-Hill.
19.
Guilford, J.P., & Fruchter, B. (1978). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education . New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Hammill, D.D., Mather, N., & Roberts, R. (2001). Illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
21.
Hammill, D.D., Mather, N., Allen, E., & Roberts, R. (2001). Using semantics, grammar, phonology, and rapid naming tasks to predict literacy. Manuscript in preparation.
22.
Hammill, D.D., & McNutt, G. (1981). Correlates of reading . Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
23.
Hammill, D.D., & Newcomer, P. (1997). Test of language development-intermediate (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
24.
Hammill, D.D., Pearson, N., & Wiederholt, J.L. (1997). Comprehensive test of nonverbal intelligence. Austin, TX: PRO-ED .
25.
Hays, W.L. (1994). Statistics. Fort Worth, TX : Harcourt Brace.
26.
Jansky, J.J. (1978). A critical review of some developmental and predictor precursors of reading disabilities. In A. L. Benton & D. Pearl (Eds.), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 331-347). New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Jansky, J.J., & deHirsh, K. (1972). Preventing reading failure. New York: Harper & Row.
28.
Kingslake, B.J. (1983). The predictive (in)accuracy of on-entry to school screening procedures when used to anticipate learning difficulties. British Journal of Special Education, 10, 24-26.
Lyon, G.R. (1995). Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 3-30.
31.
MacEachron, A.E. (1982). Basic statistics in the human services. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
32.
Manis, F.R., Doi, L.M., & Bhadha, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33, 325-333.
33.
Manis, F.R., Seidenberg, M.S., & Doi, L.M. (1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second grades. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 129-157.
34.
Marsh, H.W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin,97, 562-582.
35.
Mather, N., & Allen, E. (2001, May). Using adapted rapid naming formats to predict varied aspects of literacy in elementary age children. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Boulder, CO.
36.
Mausner, J.S., & Kramer, S.K. (1985). Screening in the detection of disease. In Mausner & Bahn epidemiology—An introductory text (2nd ed.; pp. 214-238). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
37.
Meyer, M.S., Wood, F.B., Hart, L.A., & Felton, R.H. (1998). Selective predictive value of rapid automatized naming in poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 106-117.
38.
Newby-Clark, E.D., & Bowers, P.G. (1999, April). Developmental trends in phonemic awareness, naming speed, and working memory across the elementary grades. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Montreal, Canada.
39.
O'Connor, R.E., & Jenkins, J.R. (1999). Prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 159-197.
40.
Reynolds, C.R. (1990). Conceptual and technical problems in learning disabilities diagnosis. In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence and achievement (pp. 571-592). New York: Guilford .
41.
Reynolds, C.R. (1999). Inferring causality from relational data and designs: Historical and contemporary lessons for research and clinical practice. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 386-395.
42.
Scanlon, D.M., & Vellutino, F.R. (1996). Prerequisite skills, early instruction, and success in first-grade reading: Selected results from a longitudinal study. Mental Retardation and Developmental Research Reviews , 2, 54-63.
43.
Scarborough, H.S. (1998a). Early identification of children at risk for reading. In B. K. Shapiro, P. J. Accardo, & A. J. Capute (Eds.), Specific reading disability (pp. 75-120). Timonium, MD: York Press.
44.
Scarborough, H.S. (1998b). Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 115-136.
45.
Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C.D., Francis, D.J., Foorman, B., & Fletcher, J.M. (in press). Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
46.
Schatschneider, C., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., & Foorman, B.R. (in press). The relationship between rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in the prediction of early reading skills. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.
47.
Semel, E., Wiig, E.H., & Secord, W. (1987). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals-Revised . San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
48.
Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
49.
Stanovich, K., & Siegel, S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
Torgesen, J.K., & Mathes, P.G. (2000). A basic guide to understanding, assessing, and teaching phonological awareness. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
52.
Torgesen, J.K., & Wagner, R.K. (1998). Alternative diagnostic approaches for specific developmental reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 220-232.
53.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999) Test of word reading efficiency . Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
54.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming to the growth of word-reading skills in second- to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 161-185.
55.
Tucker, L.R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
56.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1999). Statistical abstract of the United States: The national data book. Washington, DC: Author.
57.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
58.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
59.
Wheaton, B., Muthén, B., Alwin, D.F., & Summers, G.F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models . In D. R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 84-136). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
60.
Wolf, M. (1991). Naming speed and reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 123-141.
61.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P.G. (2000). Naming speed deficits in developmental reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 322-324.
62.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P.G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387-407.
63.
Woodcock, R. (1988). Woodcock reading mastery tests-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services .
