This study investigated whether changes in the working memory (WM) performance of readers with learning disabilities (LD) is related to a general or domain-specific system. The study compared readers with LD, chronologically age-matched (CA-M), and reading level-matched (RL-M) children's WM performance for phonological, visual-spatial, and semantic information under initial (no probes or cues), gain (cues that bring performance to an asymptotic level), and maintenance (asymptotic conditions without cues) conditions. The main findings indicated that (a) CA-M children were superior in performance to readers with LD across initial, gain, and maintenance conditions, (b) readers with LD showed less change (as reflected in effect size scores, slopes for the quadratic curve) on both visual-spatial and verbal (phonological and semantic) WM tasks across gain and maintenance conditions than the CA-matched children, and (c) the performance of readers with LD was superior to the RL-M children's performance on initial conditions, but inferior on gain and maintenance conditions. Taken together, the results suggest that a general system moderated the changes in retrieval of phonological, visual-spatial, and semantic information in readers with LD.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. London: Oxford University Press.
2.
Baddeley, A.D. (1990). Human memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
3.
Baddeley, A.D. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 5-28.
4.
Brinley, J.F. (1965). Cognitive sets, speed and accuracy in performance in the elderly. In A. T. Welford & J. E. (Eds.), Behavior, aging and the nervous system (pp. 114-149). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
5.
Bryant, P.E., & Goswami, U. (1986). The strengths and weaknesses of the reading level design: A comment on Backman, Mamen and Ferguson. Psychological Bulletin,100, 101-103.
6.
Cantor, J., & Engle, R.W. (1993). Working memory capacity as long-term memory activation: An individual-differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1101-1114.
7.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press .
8.
Conway, R.A., & Engle, R.W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 123, 354-373.
9.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
10.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P.A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 4, 561-584.
11.
Dunn, L.M. & Dunn, L.M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised: Manual for forms L & M. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
12.
Engle, R.W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J.J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 972-992.
13.
Federal Register. (1977). The rules of a regulatory for implementing P.L. 94-142. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14.
Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S., Stuebing, K.K., & Shaywitz, B. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal model, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3-17.
15.
Gathercole, S.E., & Baddeley, A.D. (1993). Working memory and language . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Graham, S. (1997). Executive control in revising of students with learning and writing difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 223-234.
17.
Hale, S. (1990). A global developmental trend in cognitive processing speed. Child Development, 61, 653-663.
18.
Hall, J.W., Wilson, K., Humphreys, M.S., Tinzmann, M.B., & Bower, P.M. (1983). Phonemic similarity effects in good vs. poor readers . Memory & Cognition, 11, 520-527.
19.
Howe, M.L., Rabinowitz, M., & Grant, M.J. (1993). On measuring (in) dependence of cognitive processes . Psychological Review, 100, 737-747.
20.
Jackson, N.E., & Butterfield, E.C. (1989). Reading-level-match designs: Myths and realities. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 387-412.
21.
Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. (1984). Wide range achievement test-Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
22.
Johnston, R.S., Rugg, M.D., & Scott, T. (1987). Phonological similarity effects, memory span, and developmental reading disorders: The nature of the relationship. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 205-211.
23.
Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review , 99, 122-149.
24.
Kail, R. (1993). The role of global mechanisms in developmental change in speed of processing. In M. Howe & R. Pasnak (Eds.), Emerging themes in cognitive development (Vol. 1, pp. 97-116). New York: Springer-Verlag.
25.
Liberman, I.Y., Mann, V.A., Shankweiler, D., & Werfelman, M. (1982). Children's memory for recurring linguistic and non-linguistic material in relation to reading ability. Cortex , 18, 367-375.
26.
Martin, R.C., Shelton, J.R., & Yaffee, L.S. (1994). Language processing and working memory: Neuropsychological evidence for separate phonological and semantic capacities. Journal of Memory andLanguage, 33, 83-111.
27.
Miyake, A., Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1994). Working memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 33, 175-202.
28.
Morris, N., & Jones, D.M. (1990). Memory updating in working memory: The role of the central executive. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 111-121.
29.
Pressley, M. (1991). Can learning disabled children become good information processors? How can we find out? In L. Feagan , E. Short, & L. Meltzer (Eds.), Subtypes of learning disabilities (pp. 137-162). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Salway, A.F., & Logie, R.H. (1995). Visuospatial working memory, movement control and executive demands. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 253-269.
33.
Salthouse, T.A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403-428.
34.
SAS Institute, Inc. (1992). SAS technical report P-229: Changes and enhancements, Release 6.07. Cary, NC: Author.
35.
Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Shankweiler, D., & Crain, S. (1986). Language mechanisms and reading disorder. Cognition, 24, 139-168.
37.
Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I.Y., Mark, L.S., Fowler, C.A., & Fischer, F.W. (1979). The speech code and learning to read. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning, and Memory, 5, 531-545.
38.
Siegel, L.S. (1988). Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disabilities. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 202-215.
39.
Siegel, L.S. (1993). Phonological processing deficits as the basis of a reading disability. Developmental Review, 13, 246-257.
40.
Siegel, L.S., & Ryan, E.B. (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled. Child Development , 60, 973-980.
41.
Slosson, R.L. (1963). Slosson intelligence test for children and adults . New York: Slosson Educational Publishing.
42.
Stanovich, K.E., & Siegel, L. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
43.
Steiger, J.H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlational matrix. Psychological Bulletin,87, 245-251.
44.
Swanson, H.L. (1992). The modifiability and generality of working memory in skilled and less-skilled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 473-488.
Swanson, H.L. (1996). Individual and age-related differences in children's working memory. Memory & Cognition, 24, 70-82.
49.
Swanson, H.L. (1999). Reading comprehension and working memory in learning disabled readers: Is the phonological loop more important than the executive system?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 1-31.
50.
Swanson, H.L., & Alexander, J. (1997). Cognitive processes that predict reading in learning disabled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 128-158.
51.
Swanson, H.L., Ashbaker, M.H., & Lee, C. (1996). Learning-disabled readers' working memory as a function of processing demands. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 242-275.
52.
Swanson, H.L., Cooney, J.B., O'Shaunghnessy, T. (1998). Memory and learning disabilities. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Understanding learning disabilities (2nd Ed., pp. 47-98). San Diego: Academic Press.
53.
Teasdale, J.D., Proctor, L., Lloyd, C.A., & Baddeley, A.D. (1993). Working memory and stimulus-independent thought: Effects of working memory load and presentation rate. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 417-433.
54.
Vellutino, F., Scanlon, D.M., & Spearing, D. (1995). Semantic and phonological coding in poor and normal readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 76-123.
55.
Verbeke, G. (1997). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. In G. Verbeke & G. Molenberghs (Eds.), Linear mixed models in practice (pp. 63-155). New York: Springer- Verlag.
56.
Waller, T.G. (1976). Children's recognition memory for written sentences: A comparison of good and poor readers. Child Development, 47, 90-95.
