Children referred for evaluation of learning impairment (LI, N =100) and a comparison group of nonreferred (NLI, N = 243) children were evaluated on a visual filtering task. The task was designed hierarchically to provide for evaluation of component operations—serial search, parallel search, decision, and response. With each additional processing demand, response times increased disproportionately for the LI group relative to the NLI group. Overall response time reliably predicted academic skills and cognitive ability, but was more strongly related to group membership. Thus, this nonverbal visual task is sensitive to a characteristic of children with learning problems over and above discrete academic and cognitive skills. Children with problems adapting to the demands of schooling may be distinguished by a disproportionate vulnerability to processing load.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bentin, S. (1992). Phonological awareness, reading, and reading acquisition: A survey and appraisal of current knowledge. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 193-210). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2.
Bjaalid, I.K., Hoien, T., & Lundberg, I. (1993). Letter identification and lateral masking in dyslexics and normal readers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research , 37, 151-161.
3.
Boden, C., & Brodeur, D.A. (1999). Visual processing of verbal and nonverbal stimuli in adolescents with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 58-71.
4.
Boder, E. (1970). Developmental dyslexia: A new diagnostic approach based on the identification of three subtypes. Journal of School Health, 40, 289-290.
5.
Bradley, L. (1989). Predicting learning disabilities. In J. J. Dumont & H. Nakken (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Cognitive, social and remedial aspects (pp. 1-17). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
6.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press .
7.
Bryant, S.K., McIntyre, C.W., Murray, M.E., & Blackwell, S.L. (1983). Rate of visual information pick-up in learning disabled and normal boys. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 166-171.
8.
Cheal, M., & Lyon, D., (1992). Attention in visual search: Multiple search classes . Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 113-138.
9.
Cornelissen, P. (1993). Fixation, contrast sensitivity, and children's reading. In S. F. Wright & R. Groner (Eds.), Facets of dyslexia and its remediation. Amsterdam: Elsevier .
10.
Cornelissen, P., Richardson, A., Mason, A., Fowler, S., & Stein, J. (1994). Contrast sensitivity and coherent motion detection measured at photopic luminance levels in dyslexics and controls. Vision Research, 35, 1483-1494.
11.
Curley, J.F., & Ginard, R.J. (1990). A computerized visual search task as a measured of cerebral dysfunction and organization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 895-904.
12.
Duffy, F., McAnulty, G., Wolff, P., & Waber, D. (1999). Differences in cortical connectivity by EEG coherence in learning imparied children at rest and while finger tapping. Unpublished manuscript.
Eden, G.F., Van Meter, J.W., Rumsey, J.M., Maisog, J.M., Woods, R.P., & Zeffiro, T.A. (1996). Abnormal processing of visual motion in dyslexia revealed by functional brain imaging. Nature, 382, 66-70.
15.
Eliason, M.J., & Richman, L.C. (1987). The continuous performance test in learning disabled and nondisabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 20, 614-619.
16.
Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Rourke, B.P., & Shaywitz, S.E. (1992). The validity of discrepancy-based definitions of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 25, 555-561.
17.
Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Shankweiler, D.P., Katz, L., Liberman, I.Y., Stuebing, K.K., Francis, D.J., Fowler, A.E., & Shaywitz, B.A. , (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions . Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6-23.
18.
Harris, N., & Waber, D. (1999). Information processing deficiencies in children with adequate achievement scores referred for evaluation of school difficulties . Unpublished manuscript.
19.
Kaufman, A., & Kaufman, N. (1990). Kaufman brief intelligence test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
20.
Kolligian, J., & Sternberg, R.J. (1987). Intelligence, information processing, and specific learning disabilities: A triarchic synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 8-17.
21.
Kosslyn, S.M., Hamilton, S.E., & Bernstein, J.H. (1995). The perception of curvature can be selectively disrupted in prosopagnosia. Brain andCognition, 27, 36-58.
22.
Leton, D.A., Miyamoto, L.K., & Ryckman, D.B. (1987). Psychometric classification of learning disabled students. Psychology in the Schools, 24, 201-209.
23.
Liberman, A. (1992). The relation of speech to reading and writing . In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 167-177). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
24.
Liberman, A. (1993). In speech perception, time is not what it seems . Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 682, 264-271.
25.
Liberman, I.Y. (1973). Segmentation of the spoken word and reading acquisition . Bulletin of the Orton Society, 23, 65-77.
26.
Liberman, I.Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A.M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler & I. Y Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 1-34). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
27.
Lyon, G.R., & Watson, B. (1981). Empirically derived subgroups of learning disabled readers: Diagnostic characteristics. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 14, 256-261.
28.
Martin, F., & Lovegrove, W. (1984). The effects of field size and luminance on contrast sensitivity differences between specifically reading disabled and normal children . Neuropsychologia, 22, 73-77.
29.
Martin, F., & Lovegrove, W. (1987). Flicker contrast sensitivity in normal and specifically disabled readers. Perception, 16, 215-221.
30.
Martos, F. (1995). Speed of visual information processing in developmental dyslexia. In C. K. Leong & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Developmental and acquired dyslexia (pp. 51-59). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
31.
McIntyre, C.W., Murray, M.E., & Blackwell, S.L. (1981). Visual search in learning disabled and hyperactive boys. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 14, 156-158.
32.
McIntrye, C.W., Murray, M.E., Cronin, C.M., & Blackwell, S.L. (1978). Span of apprehension in learning disabled boys. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 13-20.
33.
Metzger, M.A., & Freund L.S. (1990). Development of resistance to distraction in children with and without learning disability. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 11, 283-303.
34.
Morais, J., Content, A., Bertelson, P., Cary, L., & Kolinsky, R. (1988). Is there a sensitive period for the acquisition of segmental analysis?Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 347-352.
35.
Morgan, A., Harris, N., Bernstein, J., & Waber, D. (in press). Characteristics of children with adequate academic achievement scores referred for evaluation of school difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
36.
Morris, R.D., Stuebing, K.K., Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Lyon, G.R., Shankweiler, D.P., Katz, L., Francis, D.J., & Shaywitz, B.A. (1998). Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 347-373.
37.
Nicolson, R.I., & Fawcett, A.J. (1994). Reaction times and dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 29-48.
38.
Pennington, B.F. (1991). Diagnosing learning disorders. New York: Guilford Press.
39.
Psychological Corp. (1992). Wechsler individual achievement test . San Antonio, TX: Author.
40.
Raymond, J.E., & Sorensen, R.E. (1998). Visual motion perception in children with dyslexia: Normal detection but abnormal integration. Visual Cognition, 5, 389-404.
41.
Reynolds, C.R., & Kamphaus, R.W. (1992). Behavior assessment system for children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
42.
Rourke, B.P. (1989). Nonverbal learning disabilities: The syndrome and the model. New York: Guilford .
43.
Ruddock, K.H. (1991). Visual search and dyslexia. In J. F. Stein (Ed.), Vision and visual dyslexia (pp. 53-58). New York: Macmillan.
44.
SAS Institute, Inc. (1996a). SAS. Cary, NC: Author.
45.
SAS Institute, Inc. (1996b). SAS/STAT software: Changes and enhancements for release 6.12. Cary, NC: Author.
46.
Satz, P., & Morris, R. (1981). Learning disabilities subtypes: A review. In F. J. Pirozollo & M. C. Wittrock (Eds.), Neuropsychological and cognitive processes in reading (pp. 109-141). New York: Academic Press.
47.
Stanovich, K.E., & Siegel, L.S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
48.
Stanovich, K.E., Siegel, L.S., & Gottardo, A. (1997). Converging evidence for phonological and surface subtypes of reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology , 89, 114-127.
49.
Swanson, L. (1981). Vigilance deficit in learning disabled children: A signal detection analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 22, 393-399.
50.
Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
51.
Vellutino, F.R. (1979). Dyslexia theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
Vellutino, F.R., & Scanlon, D. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321-363.
53.
Waber, D.P., & Bernstein, J.H. (1995). Performance of learning-disabled and non-learning disabled children on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure: Validation of the developmental scoring system. Developmental Neuropsychology , 11, 237-252.
54.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children -third edition. San Antonio, TX : The Psychological Corp.
55.
Weiler, M.D., Waber, D., Bellinger, D., Marmor, J., Wypij, D., & Rancier, S. (in press). Mother and teacher reports of ADHD symptoms: DSM-IV questionnaire data. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
56.
Williams, M., Brannan, J., & Lartigue, E. (1987). Visual search in good and poor readers. Clinical VisionSciences, 1, 367-371.
57.
Wolfe, J.M., Cave, K.R., & Franzel, S. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.
