Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

For forty years management studies have repeatedly and often passionately attacked the idea that foremen held an 'ambiguous' position, 'in the middle; between workers and management. Recently labour process researchers have shown that the origins of the idea lay not in a fallacious sociology but in the well-grounded concerns of employers in a period of change early this century, when the shop steward was replacing the foreman as the natural leader of the work group. This study examines the relationship today between these two, as seen through the eyes of a group of militant shop stewards in the Melbourne vehicle industry. For them there was no ambiguity. Foremen were front-line troops of management and as such they faced them across a class divide. This is in spite of their similar origins and the availability of 'promotion' from one level to the other. The drawing of such a line was a precondition for the stewards' own effective functioning.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics (1966), Census of Population, published and unpublished data.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (1981), Census of Population, published and unpublished data.

Beynon, H. & Blackburn, R.M. (1972), Perceptions of Work , Cambridge University Press, London .

Burrawoy, M. (1979), Manufacturing Consent, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Clawson, D. (1980), Bureaucracy and the Labor Process: the Transformation of US Industry 1860-1920, Monthly Review Press , New York.

Dubin, R. (ed.) (1961), Human Relations in Administration , Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs .

Dunkerley, D. (1975), The Foreman: Aspects of Task and Structure , Routledge and Kegan Paul, London .

Eckles, R. , Carmichael, R. & Sarclet, B. (1981), Supervisory Management, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Fletcher, C. (1969), Men in the middle: a reformulation of the thesis , Sociological Review 17, 341-54.

10.

Georgiou, P. (1973), Migrants, trade unions and society, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology 9, 32-5.

11.

Gilmour, P. & Lansbury, R. (1977), The changing role of the supervisor—implications for industrial relations, Journal of Industrial Relations 19

12.

. Gilmour, P. & Lansbury, R. (1984), Marginal Manager, University of Queensland Press.

13.

Gordon, D. , Edwards, R. & Reich, M. (1982), Segmented Work, Divided Workers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge .

14.

Hay, W.W. & Bittel, L. (1970), Supervision, McGraw-Hill , Sydney.

15.

Hill, S. (1981), Competition and Control at Work, Heinemann, London.

16.

Littler, C. (1982), The Development of the Labour Process in Capitalist Societies, Heinemann, London .

17.

Nelson, D. (1975), Managers and Workers, University of Wisconsin Press.

18.

Pollard, S. (1965), The Genesis of Modern Management, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

19.

Roethlisberger, F. (1961), The foreman: man in the middle, in R. Dubin (ed.), Human Relations in Administration , Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

20.

Saville, J. (1984), Supervision in Australia, Macmillan, Melbourne.

21.

Stone, K. (1974), Origins of job structures in the steel industry , Review of Radical Political Economists 6

22.

. Strauss, G. (1961), The changing role of the working supervisor, in R. Dubin (ed.), Human Relations in Administration , Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs .

23.

Thurley, K. & Wirdenius, H. (1973), Supervision: a Reappraisal, Heinemann, London.

24.

Wood, S. (1982), The Degradation of Work, Hutchinson, London.

25.

Wray, D.W. (1949), Marginal men of industry: the foreman, Americam Journal of Sociology 54

26.

. Wright, E.O. (1980), Varieties of Marxist conceptions of class structure , Politics and Society 9

27.

. Yanouzas, J.N. (1964), A comparative study of work organisation and supervisory behaviour, Human Organisation 23.

The Supervisor and the Militant Shop Steward: Evidence from the Australian Motor Industry

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References