E-voice is now a common form of worker voice. Existing scholarship has focused on e-voice’s potential for grievance-airing and resistance; however, much work-oriented online discussion is not change oriented but more in the nature of information sharing and mutual aid. Even when not deliberately intended to be, mutual aid discussion can be an exercise of worker voice because it identifies and highlights pain points in the workplace, spreads awareness of these through online communities and constitutes an attempt to improve an objectionable state of affairs. As otherwise voiceless workers discover and act on these shared ideas en masse, they create an emergent form of collective action.
BarnesABalnaveNHollandP (2018) ‘
Utterly disgraceful’: Social media and the workplace. Australian Journal of Public Administration77: 492–499.
3.
BucherELSchouPKWaldkirchM (2021)
Pacifying the algorithm – Anticipatory compliance in the face of algorithmic management in the gig economy. Organization28: 44–67.
4.
BuddJW (2014) The future of employee voice. In: WilkinsonADonagheyJFreemanR, et al. (eds) Handbook of Research on Employee Voice. 1st ed.Northampton, MA:
Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., pp.477–487.
5.
CantC (2019) Riding for Deliveroo: Resistance in the New Economy.
Cambridge:
Polity Press.
6.
CianferoniNPerrigL (2019) Grass-root or institutionalized organization for gig workers? The case of food deliveries in Switzerland. In: 6th Conference of the regulating for decent work network, Geneva, 8--10 July 2019.
7.
CohenNRichardsJ (2015) ‘
I didn't feel like I was alone anymore’: Evaluating self‐organised employee coping practices conducted via Facebook. New Technology, Work and Employment30: 222–236.
8.
ColvinA (2013) Organizational primacy: Employment conflict in a post-standard contract world. In: Van Wezel StoneKArthursH (eds) Rethinking Workplace Regulation: Beyond the Standard Contract of Employment.
New York:
Russell Sage, pp.194–210.
ConwayERosatiPMonksK, et al. (2019)
Voicing job satisfaction and dissatisfaction through Twitter: Employees’ use of cyberspace. New Technology, Work and Employment34: 139–156.
11.
CourpassonD (2017)
Beyond the hidden/public resistance divide: How bloggers defeated a big company. Organization Studies38: 1277–1302.
12.
DiamondWFreemanR (2002)
Will unionism prosper in cyberspace? The promise of the internet for employee organization. British Journal of Industrial Relations40: 569–596.
13.
DundonTGollanP (2007)
Re-conceptualizing voice in the non-union workplace. The International Journal of Human Resource Management18: 1182–1198.
14.
EtterMAlbuOB (2021)
Activists in the dark: Social media algorithms and collective action in two social movement organizations. Organization28: 68–91.
15.
FlanaganF (2019)
Theorising the gig economy and home-based service work. Journal of Industrial Relations61: 57–78.
16.
FlemingPSpicerA (2007) Contesting the Corporation: Struggle, Power and Resistance in Organizations.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
17.
FordMHonanV (2019)
The limits of mutual aid: Emerging forms of collectivity among app-based transport workers in Indonesia. Journal of Industrial Relations61: 528–548.
FreemanRBoxallPHaynesP (2007) What Workers Say: Employee Voice in the Anglo-American Workplace.
Ithaca and London:
ILR Press.
21.
FreemanRMedoffJ (1984) What Do Unions Do?
New York:
Basic Books.
22.
GegenhuberTEllmerMSchüßlerE (2020)
Microphones, not megaphones: Functional crowdworker voice regimes on digital work platforms.Human Relations0: 0018726720915761.
23.
GlaserBGStraussAL (2017) Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Routledge.
24.
GoodrichCL (1920) The Frontier of Control.
London:
Bell & Sons.
25.
HeckscherCMcCarthyJ (2014)
Transient solidarities: Commitment and collective action in post-industrial societies. British Journal of Industrial Relations52: 627–657.
26.
HeilandH (2020) Workers’ Voice in Platform Labour: An Overview. Germany: WSI Institute of Economic and Social Research.
27.
HillS (2015) Raw Deal: How the “Uber Economy” and Runaway Capitalism Are Screwing American Workers.
New York:
St. Martin's Press.
28.
HirschmanAO (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
29.
HollandPCooperBKHeckerR (2016)
Use of social media at work: A new form of employee voice?The International Journal of Human Resource Management27: 2621–2634.
30.
HoweJ (2009) Crowdsourcing: How the Power of the Crowd is Driving the Future of Business.
London:
Random House Business.
31.
HymanR (1989) The Political Economy of Industrial Relations.
London:
Macmillan.
32.
HymanR (1997)
The future of employee representation. British Journal of Industrial Relations35: 309–336.
33.
Irani L and SilbermanMS (2013) Turkopticon: Interrupting worker invisibility on Amazon Mechanical Turk. In: Conference on human factors in computing systems, Paris, 27 April-2 May, 2013.
34.
KalfaSBuddJW (2020) The future of employee voice. In: Wilkinson A, Donaghey J, Dundon T and Freeman R (eds) Handbook of Research on Employee Voice. 2nd ed. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.566–580.
35.
KaranovićJBerendsHEngelY (2020) Regulated dependence: Platform workers’ responses to new forms of organizing. Journal of Management Studies. Epub ahead of print 2 April 2020. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12577.
36.
KellyJE (1998) Rethinking Industrial Relations: Mobilisation, Collectivism, and Long Waves,
London:
Routledge.
37.
KochanTAKimballWTYangD, et al. (2019)
Worker voice in America: Is there a gap between what workers expect and what they experience?ILR Review72: 3–38.
38.
KozinetsR (2010) Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online.
London:
SAGE.
39.
LevesqueCMurrayG (2006)
How do unions renew? Paths to union renewal. Labor Studies Journal31: 1–13.
40.
LoudounRTownsendKWilkinsonA, et al. (2020)
The role of peer-to-peer voice in severe work environments: Organisational facilitators and barriers. Industrial Relations Journal51: 556–571.
41.
MaffieMD (2020)
The role of digital communities in organizing gig workers. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society59: 123–149.
42.
MarkeyRRavenswoodKWebberDJ, et al. (2013)
Influence at work and the desire for more influence. Journal of Industrial Relations55: 507–526.
43.
MowbrayPKWilkinsonATseHHM (2019) Evolution, separation and convergence of employee voice concept. In: HollandPTeicherJDonagheyJ (eds) Employee Voice at Work.
Singapore:
Springer, p. 3–21.
NewlandsGLutzCFieselerC (2018)
Collective action and provider classification in the sharing economy. New Technology, Work and Employment 33(3): 250–267.
46.
PeetzD (2019) The Realities and Futures of Work.
Acton:
ANU Press.
47.
PeirceESmolinskiCARosenB (1998)
Why sexual harassment complaints fall on deaf ears. Academy of Management Perspectives12: 41–54.
48.
PymanATeicherJCooperB, et al. (2009)
Unmet demand for union membership in Australia. Journal of Industrial Relations51: 5–24.
49.
QuinlanM (2017) The Origins of Worker Mobilisation: Australia 1788-1850.
New York:
Taylor & Francis.
50.
RichardsJ (2016) Netnographical methods and the challenge of researching hidden and secretive employee social media practices. In: TownsendKLoudounRLewinD (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods on Human Resource Management: Innovative Techniques.
Cheltenham, UK:
Edward Elgar, p.92.
RosenblatA (2018) Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work.
Oakland, CA:
University of California Press.
53.
RosenblatAStarkL (2016)
Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber's drivers. International Journal of Communication (Online)10: 3758–3784.
54.
SoonCKluverR (2014)
Uniting political bloggers in diversity: Collective identity and web activism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19: 500–515.
55.
StanfordJ (2017)
The resurgence of gig work: Historical and theoretical perspectives. The Economic and Labour Relations Review28: 382–401.
56.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.
57.
SutherlandWJarrahiMHDunnM, et al. (2020)
Work precarity and gig literacies in online freelancing. Work, Employment and Society34: 457–475.
58.
TarasDGesserA (2003)
How new lawyers use e-voice to drive firm compensation: The “greedy associates” phenomenon.Journal of Labor Research24: 9–29.
59.
TassinariAMaccarroneV (2019)
Riders on the storm: Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK.Work, Employment and Society34: 35–54.
60.
TaylorD (1982) Employee Information Sharing.
Canberra:
Australian Government Publishing Service.
61.
ThompsonPMcDonaldPO’ConnorP (2020)
Employee dissent on social media and organizational discipline. Human Relations73: 631–652.
62.
ThornthwaiteL (2016)
Chilling times: Social media policies, labour law and employment relations. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources54: 332–351.
63.
ThornthwaiteLMacmillanCBarnesA (2020) The internet, the web and social media: The promise and practice of e-voice. In: WilkinsonADonagheyJDundonT, et al. (eds) Handbook of Research on Employee Voice. 2nd ed.:
Northampton, MA:
Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.509–523.
64.
Upchurch M and GrassmanR (2016)
Striking with social media: The contested (online) terrain of workplace conflict. Organization23: 639–656.
65.
van den BroekDBarnesATownsendK (2008) ‘
Teaming up’: Teams and team sharing in call centres. Journal of Industrial Relations50: 257–269.
66.
VandaeleK (2018) Will Trade Unions Survive in the Platform Economy? Emerging Patterns of Platform Workers’ Collective Voice and Representation in Europe.
Brussels, Belgium:
European Trade Union Institute, p.33.
67.
VandaeleK (2021) Collective resistance and organizational creativity amongst Europe's platform workers: A new power in the labour movement? In: HaidarJKeuneM (eds) Work and Labour Relations in Global Platform Capitalism.
Cheltenham/Geneva:
Edward Elgar/ILO.
68.
van ZoonenWVerhoevenJWMVliegenthartR (2016)
How employees use Twitter to talk about work: A typology of work-related tweets. Computers in Human Behavior55: 329–339.
69.
VisserJ (2019) Trade Unions in the Balance.
Geneva:
ILO-ACTRAV.
70.
Walker M, Fleming P and Berti M (2021) ‘You can’t pick up a phone and talk to someone’: How algorithms function as biopower in the gig economy. Organization, 28(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420978831
71.
Wanrooy BV, BewleyHBrysonA, et al. (2013) The 2011 Workplace Employment Relations Study: First Findings. London: Department for Business Innovation & Skills.
72.
WexlerMN (2011)
Reconfiguring the sociology of the crowd: Exploring crowdsourcing. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy31: 6–20.
73.
WilhoitEDKisselburghLG (2015)
Collective action without organization: The material constitution of bike commuters as collective. Organization Studies36: 573–592.
74.
WilkinsonAFayC (2011)
New times for employee voice?Human Resource Management50: 65–74.
75.
WilkinsonAGollanPJKalfaS, et al. (2018) Voices unheard: Employee voice in the new century. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 29: 711–724.
76.
WillmanPBrysonAGomezR (2006)
The sound of silence: Which employers choose no employee voice and why?Socio-Economic Review4: 283–299.
77.
WoodAJ (2015)
Networks of injustice and worker mobilisation at Walmart. Industrial Relations Journal46: 259–274.
78.
WoodAJ (2020)
Beyond mobilisation at McDonald’s: Towards networked organising. Capital & Class44: 493–502.
79.
WoodAJLehdonvirtaVGrahamM (2018)
Workers of the Internet unite? Online freelancer organisation among remote gig economy workers in six Asian and African countries. New Technology, Work and Employment33: 95–112.
80.
WoodcockJGrahamM (2019) The Gig Economy: A Critical Introduction.
Cambridge, UK:
Polity Press.
