Prior to the Pike River Coal Mine disaster in which 29 workers were killed, the discourse around the mine was one of success in terms of safety and environment, yet the post-disaster the discourse quickly shifted to ‘a disaster waiting to happen’. The central question is: why did so many individuals remain silent over the lethal working conditions prior to a major mining disaster? In order to understand the reasons, we draw on the corporate social responsibility literature and Thomas Mathiesen’s work on systemic silencing of stakeholders as it provides an inclusive framework of the subtle, pervasive methods of a network consisting of professional associations, organisations, government departments and whole communities that are pressured into silence. The framework not only provides an analysis of why and under what conditions individuals remain silent, but it also provides the context in which silencing occurs. Analysis of the Pike River Coal Mine disaster demonstrates that silently silencing stakeholders is not solely a consequence of suppressive stances of the corporation, but rather that the corporation itself is one of many stakeholders in a social, economic and political industrial relations context that leads to systemic silencing of individuals and, in this case, the deaths of 29 workers at the mine.
AinsworthSHardyC (2008) The enterprising self: An unsuitable job for an older worker. Organization15(3): 389–405.
2.
AlparslanAMCanAErdemR (2015) Reasons for employee silence behavior: Developing and validating a scale for nurses. Journal of Health Administration18(2): 183–204.
3.
BanerjeeSB (2000) Whose land is it anyway? National interest, indigenous stakeholders, and colonial discourses: The case of the Jabiluka Uranium mine. Organization and Environment13: 3–38.
4.
BanerjeeSB (2008) Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology34: 51–79.
5.
BarryMWilkinsonA (2016) Pro-social or pro-management? A critique of the conception of employee voice as a pro-social behaviour within organizational behaviour. British Journal of Industrial Relations54(2): 261–284.
6.
BeamishTD (2000) Accumulating trouble: Complex organization, a culture of silence, and a secret spill. Social Problems47(4): 473–498.
7.
BernsteinMH (1955) Regulating Business by Independent Commission, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
BinghamLBNabatchiTO'LearyR (2005) The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review65(5): 547–558.
9.
BrownJDillardJ (2015) Dialogic accountings for stakeholders: On opening up and closing down participatory governance. Journal of Management Studies52(7): 961–985.
10.
BruecknerMMamunMA (2010) Living downwind from corporate social responsibility: A community perspective on corporate practice. Business Ethics: A European Review19(4): 326–348.
11.
CowtonCJ (1998) The use of secondary data in business ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics17(4): 423–434.
12.
CraneAPalazzoGSpenceLJMattenD (2014) Contesting the value of ‘creating shared value’. California Management Review56(2): 130–153.
13.
CraneAGlozerS (2016) Researching corporate social responsibility communication: Themes, opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Studies53(7): 1223–1252.
14.
DeetzS (1995) Transforming Communication, Transforming Business: Building Responsive and Responsible Workplaces, London: Hampton Press.
15.
DenizNNoyanAErtosunÖG (2013) The relationship between employee silence and organizational commitment in a private healthcare company. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences99: 691–700.
16.
DerryR (2012) Reclaiming marginalized stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics111(2): 253–264.
17.
DinicaV (2015) New Zealand's silent reform. Policy Quarterly11(2): 26–36.
18.
DonagheyJCullinaneNDundonTWilkinsonA (2011) Reconceptualising employee silence: Problems and prognosis. Work, Employment and Society25(1): 51–67.
19.
DyneLVAngSBoteroIC (2003) Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies40(6): 1359–1392.
20.
Erdiaw-KwasieMOAlamKShahiduzzamanM (2017) Towards understanding stakeholder salience transition and relational approach to ‘better’ corporate social responsibility: A case for a proposed model in practice. Journal of Business Ethics144(1): 85–101.
21.
EwenP (2014) Pike Death by Parliament, Christchurch: Pit Pony Press.
22.
FlemingPJonesM (2013) The End of Corporate Social Responsibility: Crisis and Critique, London: SAGE Publications.
23.
FreemanRE (2004) The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik5(3): 228.
24.
Glendon AI, Clarke S and McKenna E (2016) Human Safety and Risk Management. Boca Raton, FL: Crc Press.
25.
GreenbergJEdwardsMS (2009) Voice and Silence in Organizations, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
26.
GunninghamN (2008) Occupational health and safety, worker participation and the mining industry in a changing world of work. Economic and Industrial Democracy29(3): 336–361.
27.
GunninghamNNealD (2011) Review of the Department of Labour's Interactions with Pike River Coal Limited, Wellington: Department of Labour.
28.
Hancock P (2015) Health and safety – an essential element of ethical practice. Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 38–42.
29.
HarrisH (2001) Content analysis of secondary data: A study of courage in managerial decision making. Journal of Business Ethics34(3–4): 191–208.
30.
HolleyEAMitchamC (2016) The Pebble Mine Dialogue: A case study in public engagement and the social license to operate. Resources Policy47: 18–27.
31.
House ER and Howe KR (2003) Deliberative democratic evaluation. In: Kellaghan T and Stufflebeam DL (eds) International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 79–100.
32.
JensenTSandströmJ (2011) Stakeholder theory and globalization: The challenges of power and responsibility. Organization Studies32: 473–488.
Karin B (ed.) (2010) Environmental Politics and Deliberative Democracy: Examining the Promise of New Modes of Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
35.
Kish-GephartJJDetertJRTrevinoLKEdmonsonAC (2009) Silenced by fear: The nature, sources and consequences of fear at work. Research in Organizational Behavior29: 163–193.
36.
Knoll M and Van Dick R (2013) Do I hear the whistle…? A first attempt to measure four forms of employee silence and their correlates. Journal of Business Ethics 113(2): 349–362.
37.
LaffontJJTiroleJ (1991) The politics of government decision-making: A theory of regulatory capture. The Quarterly Journal of Economics106(4): 1089–1127.
38.
LamareJRLammFMcDonnellNWhiteH (2015) Independent, dependent, and employee: Contractors and New Zealand's Pike River Coal Mine disaster. Journal of Industrial Relations57(1): 72–93.
39.
Lamm F (1992) Persuasion or coercion? enforcement strategies in occupational health and safety. In: Deeks J and Perry N (eds) Controlling Interests. Auckland: University of Auckland Press, pp.156–176.
40.
LammFRasmussenEAndersonA (2013) The case of the disappearing Department of Labour: Whither goes state protection for vulnerable workers. In: SargeantMOriM (eds) Vulnerable Workers and Precarious Working, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 184–219.
41.
LaplumeAOSonparKLitzRA (2008) Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management34(6): 1152–1189.
42.
LukesS (1974) Power: A Radical View, London and New York: Macmillan.
43.
LukesS (2005) Power and the battle for hearts and minds. Millennium – Journal of International Studies33(3): 477–493.
44.
MacFie R (2012) The risk culture at Pike River Mine. New Zealand Listener 10 March, 1–6.
45.
MacFieR (2013) Tragedy at Pike River Mine: How and Why 29 Men Died, Wellington: Awa Press.
46.
McWilliamsASiegelD (2001) Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review26(1): 117–127.
47.
MadsenPM (2009) These lives will not be lost in vain: Organizational learning from disaster in US coal mining. Organization Science20(5): 861–875.
48.
MarkeyRPatmoreG (2011) Employee participation in health and safety in the Australian steel industry, 1935–2006. British Journal of Industrial Relations49(1): 144–167.
49.
MathiesenT (2004) Silently Silenced: Essays on the Creation of Acquiescence in Modern Society, Winchester: Waterside Press.
50.
MathiesenT (2014) The Politics of Abolition Revisited, London: Routledge.
51.
MenaSRintamäkiJFlemingPSpicerA (2016) On the forgetting of corporate irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review41(4): 720–738. .
52.
Miceli MP, Near JP and Dworkin TM (2013) Whistle-blowing in organizations. Oxon: Psychology Press.
53.
Milliken FJ, Morrison EW and Hewlin PF (2003) An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don't communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies 40(6): 1453–1476.
54.
MisztalBA (2003) Durkheim on collective memory. Journal of Classical Sociology3(2): 123–143.
55.
MitchellRKAgleBRWoodDJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review22(4): 853–886.
56.
MoffatKZhangA (2014) The paths to social licence to operate: An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining. Resources Policy39: 61–70.
57.
Morrison EW (2014) Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 1(1): 173–197.
58.
MorrisonEWMillikenFJ (2003) Speaking up, remaining silent: The dynamics of voice and silence in organizations. Journal of Management Studies40(6): 1353–1358.
59.
MuttiDYakovlevaNVazquez-BrustD (2012) Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Perspectives from stakeholder groups in Argentina. Resources Policy37: 212–222.
60.
NaderRPetkasPJBlackwellK (1972) Whistleblowing: The Report of the Conference on Professional Responsibility, New York: Grossman.
OlickJKRobbinsJ (1998) Social memory studies: From ‘collective memory’ to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annual Review of Sociology24(1): 105–140.
64.
OnnAHWoodleyA (2014) A discourse analysis on how the sustainability agenda is defined within the mining industry. Journal of Cleaner Production84: 116–127.
65.
PerrowC (2011) Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
PinderCCHarlosKP (2001) Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management20: 331–370.
67.
PrnoJSlocombeDS (2012) Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy37: 346–357.
68.
QuinlanM (2014) Ten Pathways to Death and Disaster: Learning from Fatal Incidents in Mines and Other High Hazard Workplaces, Sydney: Federation Press.
69.
Royal Commission on the Pike River Coal Mine Tragedy (2012) The report of the Royal Commission on the Pike River Coal Mine Tragedy. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs. http://pikeriver.royalcommission.govt.nz/Final-Report.
70.
SargeantMTuckerE (2009) Layers of vulnerability in occupational safety and health for migrant workers: Case studies from Canada and the UK. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety7(2): 51–73.
71.
ScanduraTAWilliamsEA (2000) Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal43(6): 1248–1264.
72.
Sonenshein S (2007) The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review 32(4): 1022–1040.
73.
TombsSWhyteD (2007) Safety Crimes, Cullompton: Taylor & Francis.
74.
TrinkausJGiacaloneJ (2005) The silence of the stakeholders: Zero decibel level at Enron. Journal of Business Ethics58: 237–248.
75.
TrumpyAJ (2008) Subject to negotiation: The mechanisms behind co-optation and corporate reform. Social Problems55(4): 480–500.
76.
TuckerE (1995) The Westray mine disaster and its aftermath: The politics of causation. Canadian Journal of Law & Society10(1): 91–123.
77.
Tucker E (2006) Introduction: The politics of recognition and response. In: Tucker E (ed) Working Disasters. New York: Baywood Publishing, pp.1–20.
78.
UffJ (2014) Review of ethical principles in the context of recent engineering-related disasters. IPENZ Transactions41: 1–11.
79.
VakolaMBouradasD (2005) Antecedents and consequences of organizational silence: An empirical investigation. Employee Relations27(5): 441–458.
80.
WaltersDNicholsT (2006) Representation and consultation on health and safety in chemicals: An exploration of limits to the preferred model. Employee Relations28(3): 230–254.
81.
Yin R (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd edn. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
