Employment relations is on the defensive. A gender lens provides opportunities for revitalisation through bringing in social reproduction alongside production, introducing intersectional identities alongside class, developing gendered critiques of ‘neutral’ markets and recognising the ‘doing of gender’ within the workplace. However, resistance within research and practice is evident in gender blindness, marginalisation of gender issues or preference for male interests. Three risks associated with a gender lens are identified: first, feminist critiques may be used by employers or neoliberal policymakers to deregulate employment; second, by making gender visible, gender differences may be used to legitimise gender inequalities; and third, in representing workers’ interests many pitfalls need to be navigated in steering a path between excessive fragmentation and reproducing hierarchy, whether by class, gender or race. Nevertheless, the costs of not embracing a gender perspective go beyond missed opportunities for renewal and leave employment relations at risk of further decline.
AckerJ (1989) Doing Comparable Worth, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
2.
AckerJ (2006) Inequality regimes: Gender, class and race in organisations. Gender and Society20(4): 441–464.
3.
AckerJ (2012) Gendered organizations and intersectionality: Problems and possibilities. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal31: 214–224.
4.
AckersPWilkinsonA (2003) Understanding Work and Employment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
AlbertiGHolgateJTapiaM (2013) Organising migrants as workers or as migrant workers? Intersectionality, trade unions and precarious work. International Journal of Human Resource Management24(22): 4132–4148.
6.
Arthurs A (2004) Emotional labour, equal value, and job evaluation. Working Paper, University of Bath School of Management, Bath.
7.
BergPPiszczekM (2014) The limits of equality bargaining in the USA. Journal of Industrial Relations56(2): 170–189.
8.
BoschGLehndorffSRuberyJ (2009) European Employment Models in Flux, Basingstoke: Palgrave, Macmillan.
Briskin L. (2006) Victimisation and agency: the social construction of union women’s leadership. Industrial Relations Journal 37(4): 359–378.
12.
BriskinL (2008) Cross-constituency organizing in Canadian unions. British Journal of Industrial Relations46(2): 221–247.
13.
BriskinL (2014) Austerity, union policy and gender equality bargaining. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research20: 115–133.
14.
BroadbridgeASimpsonR (2011) 25 years on: Reflecting on the past and looking to the future in gender and management research. British Journal of Management22: 470–483.
15.
BrochardDLetablierM (2017) Trade union involvement in work–family life balance: Lessons from France. Work, Employment and Society3(4): 657–674.
16.
BurnettSGatrellCCoopeCSparrowP (2013) Fathers at work: A ghost in the organizational machine. Gender, Work & Organization20(6): 632–646.
17.
ButlerJ (2004) Undoing Gender, London: Routledge.
18.
CainR (2016) Responsibilising recovery: Lone and low-paid parents, Universal Credit and the gendered contradictions of UK welfare reform. British Politics11(4): 488–507.
19.
CalásMSmircichLHolvinoE (2014) Theorizing gender-and-organization: Changing times … changing theories?. In: KumraSSimpsonRBurkeRJ (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Gender in Organizations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–52.
20.
CavenVLawleyS (2013) Performance, gender and sexualised work: Beyond management control, beyond legislation? A case study of work in a recruitment company. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal32(5): 475–490.
21.
CockburnC (1985) Machinery of Dominance, London: Macmillan.
22.
CohenRWolkowitzC (2018) The feminization of body work. Gender, Work & Organization25(1): 42–62.
23.
ColganF (2012) Visibility and voice in organisations: Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered employee networks. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal31(4): 359–378.
24.
Colgan F and Ledwith S (1996) Sisters organising – women and their trade unions. In: Ledwith S and Colgan F (eds) Women in Organisations. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp.152–185.
25.
ColganFMcKearneyA (2012) Visibility and voice in organisations: Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered employee networks. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal31(4): 359–378.
26.
CollingTTerryM (2010) Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice, Chichester: Wiley.
27.
ConnellRW (1995) Masculinities, Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
28.
CrenshawK (1991) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review. 1241–1299.
29.
Crouch C. (1993) Industrial Relations and European State Traditions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
30.
DeakinSButlinSMcLaughlinCPolanskaA (2015) Are litigation and collective bargaining complements or substitutes for achieving gender equality? A study of the British Equal Pay Act. Cambridge Journal of Economics39(2): 381–403.
31.
DibbenPWoodGKlerckG (2011) Employment Relations: A Critical and International Approach, London: Kogan Page.
32.
DickensL (2000) Collective bargaining and the promotion of gender equality at work: Opportunities and challenges for trade unions. Transfer6(2): 193–208.
33.
DunlopJT (1958) Industrial Relations Systems, New York: Henry Holt and Company.
34.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
35.
European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) (2014) Bargaining Equality, Brussels: ETUC.
36.
EydouxA (2014) Women during recessions in France and Germany: The gender biases of public policies. Revue de l'OFCE Debates and Policies132: 153–188. Available at: www.ofce.sciences-po.fr/pdf/revue/132/revue-132.pdf.
37.
FaganCNormanH (2016) Which fathers are involved in caring for pre-school age children in the UK? A longitudinal analysis of the influence of work hours in employment on shared childcare arrangements in couple households. In: CrespiIRuspiniE (eds) Balancing Work and Family in a Changing Society: The Fathers' Perspective, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
FagnaniFLetablierM (2014) Work and family life balance: The impact of the 35-hour laws in France. Work, Employment and Society18(3): 551–572.
39.
FarnhamD (2008) Beatrice and Sidney Webb and the intellectual origins of British industrial relations. Employee Relations30(5): 534–552.
40.
FigartDMutariEPowerM (2002) Living Wages, Equal Wages: Gender and Labour Market Policies in the United States, London: Routledge.
41.
FleetwoodS (2007) Why work–life balance now?. International Journal of Human Resource Management18(3): 387–340.
42.
FraserN (2009) Feminism, capitalism and the cunning of history. New Left Review56: 97–116.
43.
GannonBPlasmanRRyckFTojerowI (2007) Inter-industry wage differentials and the gender wage gap: Evidence from European countries. The Economic and Social Review38(1): 135–155.
44.
GregoryAMilnerS (2009) Trade unions and work–life balance: Changing times in France and the UK?. British Journal of Industrial Relations47(1): 122–146.
GrimshawDRuberyJUgarteS (2015) Does better quality contracting improve pay and HR practices? Evidence from for-profit and voluntary sector providers of adult care services in England. The Journal of Industrial Relations57(4): 502–525.
47.
HakimC (2010) Erotic capital. European Sociological Review26(5): 499–518.
48.
HealyGBradleyHMukherjeeN (2004) Individualism and collectivism revisited – A study of black minority ethnic women. Industrial Relations Journal35(5): 451–466.
49.
Healy G, Kirton G and Noon M (2010) Inequalities, intersectionality and equality and diversity initiatives: the conundrums and challenges of researching equality, inequality and diversity. In: Healy G, Kirton G and Noon M (eds) Equality, Inequalities and Diversity, Basingstoke, Palgrave, pp.1–17.
50.
HebsonGRuberyJ (2018) Employment relations and gender equality. In: WilkinsonADundonTDonagheyJet al.(eds) The Routledge Companion to Employment Relations, London: Routledge.
51.
HebsonGRuberyJGrimshawD (2015) Rethinking job satisfaction in care work: Looking beyond the care debates. Work, Employment and Society29(2): 314–330.
52.
Heery E (2003) Trade unions and industrial relations. In: Ackers P and Wilkinson A (eds) Understanding Work and Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 278–304.
53.
HeeryEConleyH (2007) Frame extension in a mature social movement: British trade unions and part-time work, 1967–2002. Journal of Industrial Relations49(1): 5–29.
54.
Holgate J, Hebson G and McBride A (2006) Why gender and “difference” matters: a critical appraisal of industrial relations research. Industrial Relations Journal 37(4): 310–328.
55.
HuntCDavidsonMFieldenSHoelH (2010) Reviewing sexual harassment in the workplace – An intervention model. Personnel Review39(5): 655–673.
56.
HymanR (1999) Imagined solidarities: Can trade unions resist globalization?. In: LeisinkP (ed.) Globalization and Labour Relations, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 94–115.
57.
JepsenMSerrano PascualA (2006) Unwrapping the European Social Model, Bristol: Policy Press.
58.
KaramessiniMRuberyJ (2014) Women and Austerity: The Economic Crisis and the Future for Gender Equality, Abingdon: Routledge.
59.
KelanEK (2010) Gender logic and (un)doing gender at work. Gender, Work & Organization17(2): 174–194.
60.
Kirton G (2010) Work-life-balance: attitudes and expectations of young black and minority ethnic graduates. In Healy G, Kirton G and Noon M (2010) (eds) Equality, Inequalities and Diversity, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
61.
KirtonG (2014) Progress towards gender democracy in UK unions 1987–2012. British Journal of Industrial Relations53(3): 484–507.
LansburyR (2009) Work and industrial relations: Towards a new agenda. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations64(2): 326–339.
64.
LedwithS (2012a) Outside, inside: Gender work in industrial relations. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal31(4): 340–358.
65.
LedwithS (2012b) Gender politics in trade unions. The representation of women between exclusion and inclusion. Transfer18(2): 185–199.
66.
LewisJ (1992) Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy2(3): 159–173.
67.
McBrideAHebsonGHolgateJ (2015) Intersectionality: Are we taking enough notice in the field of work and employment relations?. Work, Employment and Society29(2): 331–341.
68.
McBride AWaddingtonJ (2009) The representation of women and the trade union merger process. In: FoleyJBakerP (eds) Unions, Equity and the Path to Renewal, Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 192–218.
69.
McCall L (2005) The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30(3): 1771–1800.
70.
McDowellL (2010) Capital culture revisited: Sex, testosterone and the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research3(4): 652–658.
71.
MandelHSemyonovS (2006) A welfare state paradox: State interventions and women's employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology111(6): 1910–1949.
72.
MandelHShalevM (2009) Gender, class and varieties of capitalism. Social Politics16(2): 161–181.
73.
MartinezLucio M (2014) International Human Resource Management: An Employment Relations Perspective, London: SAGE.
74.
MilkmanR (2016) On Gender, Labor and Inequality, Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
75.
NathVBachSLockwoodG (2016) Dress codes and appearance norms at work: Body supplements, body modifications and aesthetic labour, ACAS Research Paper 7/16. London: ACAS.
76.
OrloffA (1993) Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review58(3): 303–328.
77.
ÖzbilginMFBeauregardTATatliABellMP (2011) Work-life, diversity and intersectionality: A critical review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews13(2): 177–198.
78.
PalierBThelenK (2010) Institutionalizing dualism: Complementarities and change in France and Germany. Politics & Society38(1): 119–148.
79.
PayneJ (2009) Emotional labour and skill: A reappraisal. Gender, Work & Organization16(3): 348–367.
80.
PettitBHookJ (2009) Institutionalizing Inequality: Gender, Family, and Economic Inequality in Comparative Perspective, New York: Russell Sage.
81.
PioreMJ (2011) Whither industrial relations: Does it have a future in post-industrial society?. British Journal of Industrial Relations49(4): 792–801.
82.
PocockB (1997) Gender and Australian industrial relations theory and research practice. Labour and Industry8(1): 1–19.
83.
PringleJK (2008) Gender in management: Theorizing gender as heterogender. British Journal of Management19(2): 110–119.
84.
RavenswoodKMarkeyR (2011) The role of unions in achieving a family-friendly workplace. Journal of Industrial Relations53(4): 486–503.
85.
RuberyJ (2011) Towards a gendering of the labour market regulation debate. Cambridge Journal of Economics35(6): 1103–1126.
86.
Rubery J (2013) Public sector adjustment and the threat to gender equality. In: Vaughan-Whitehead D. (ed.) Public Sector Shock: The Impact of Policy Retrenchment in Europe: The Impact of Policy Retrenchment in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 43–83.
87.
RuberyJFaganC (1995) Comparative industrial relations research: Towards reversing the gender bias. British Journal of Industrial Relations33(2): 209–236.
88.
RuberyJKoukiadakiA (2016) Closing the Gender Pay Gap: A Review of the Issues, Policy Mechanisms and International Evidence, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
89.
Rubery J, Keizer A & Grimshaw D (2016) Flexibility bites back: the multiple and hidden costs of flexible employment policies. Human Resource Management Journal 26 (3): 235–251.
90.
SainsburyD (1996) Gender Equality and Welfare States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
91.
SchäferAGottschallK (2015) From wage regulation to wage gap: How wage-setting institutions and structures shape the gender wage gap across three industries in 24 European countries and Germany. Cambridge Journal of Economics39(2): 467–496.
92.
SimpsonRLewisP (2007) Voice, Visibility and the Gendering of Organizations, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
93.
SommerladH (2016) “A pit to put women in”: Professionalism, work intensification, sexualisation and work–life balance in the legal profession in England and Wales. International Journal of the Legal Profession23(1): 61–82.
94.
Stratigaki M (2004) The co-optation of gender concepts in EU policies: the case of “reconciliation of work and family”. Social Politics 11(1): 30–56.
95.
TapiaMLeeTFilipovitchM (2017) Supra-union and intersectional organizing: An examination of two prominent cases in the low wage US restaurant industry. Journal of Industrial Relations59(4): 487–509.
96.
TwiggJWolkowtizCCohenRNettletonS (2011) Conceptualising body work in health and social care. Sociology of Health and Illness33(2): 171–188.
97.
WajcmanJ (2000) Feminism facing industrial relations in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations38(2): 183–201.
WarhurstCNicksonD (2009) “Who's got the look?” Emotional, aesthetic and sexualized labour in interactive services. Gender, Work & Organization16(3): 385–404.
West C and Zimmerman D (1987) Doing gender. Gender and Society 1(2): 125–51.
102.
WilkinsonAWoodGDeegR (2014) The Oxford Handbook of Employment Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
103.
WilliamsCConnellC (2010) “Looking good and sounding right”: Aesthetic labor and social inequality in the retail industry. Work and Occupations37(3): 349–377.
