Employment standards (ES) are legislated standards that set minimum terms and conditions of employment in areas such as wages, working time, vacations and leaves, and termination and severance. In Canada, the majority of workers rely on ES for basic regulatory protection; however, a significant ‘enforcement gap’ exists. In the province of Ontario, this enforcement gap has been exacerbated in recent years due to the deregulation of ES through inadequate funding, workplace restructuring, legislative reforms that place greater emphasis on individualized complaints processes and voluntary compliance, and a formal separation of unions from ES enforcement. The implications of these developments are that, increasingly, those in precarious jobs, many of whom lack union representation, are left with insufficient regulatory protection from employer non-compliance, further heightening their insecurity. Taking the province of Ontario as our focus, in this article we critically examine alternative proposals for ES enforcement, placing our attention on those that enhance the involvement of unions in addressing ES violations. Through this analysis, we suggest that augmenting unions’ supportive roles in ES enforcement holds the potential to enhance unions’ regulatory function and offers a possible means to support the ongoing efforts of other workers’ organizations to improve employer compliance with ES.
BartleyT (2005) Corporate accountability and the privatization of labor standards: Struggles over codes of conduct in the apparel industry. Research in Political Sociology20: 211–244.
4.
Canadian Press (1996) Labour activists compile ‘bad boss’ inventory. The Hamilton Spectator. 10 September, p. A2.
5.
DeakinSHobbsR (2007) False dawn for CSR? Shifts in regulatory policy and the response of the corporate and financial sectors in Britain. Corporate Governance15: 68–76.
Eidelson J (2013) ‘Alt-Unions’. The American Prospect, February, 24.1. Available at: http://prospect.org/article/alt-labor (accessed 20 December 2013).
8.
EstlundC (2005) Rebuilding the law of the workplace in an era of self-regulation. Columbia Law Review105: 319–404.
Fairey D (2009) Exclusion of Unionized Workers from Employment Standards Law. Relations Industrielles / Industrial Relations 64(1): 112–133.
11.
FineJGordonJ (2010) Strengthening labor standards enforcement through partnerships with workers’ organizations. Politics & Society38: 552–558.
12.
FudgeJ (1991) Reconceiving employment standards legislation: Labour law’s little sister and the feminization of labour. Journal of Law and Social Policy7: 73–90.
GellatlyMGrundyJMirchandaniK (2011) ‘Modernizing’ employment standards? Administrative efficiency and the production of the illegitimate claimant in Ontario, Canada. Economic and Labour Relations Review22(2): 81–106.
HardyTHoweJ (2009) Partners in enforcement? The new balance between government and trade union enforcement of employment standards in Australia. Australian Journal of Labour Law23(3): 306–336.
17.
HillJ (2010) Can unions use worker center strategies? In an age of doing more with less, unions should consider thinking locally but acting globally. Florida International University Law Review5: 551–592.
18.
HoweJLandauI (2007) ‘Light touch’ labour regulation by state governments in Australia. Melbourne University Law Review31: 367–399.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1947) Labour Inspection Convention (No. 81). Geneva: ILO. Available at: http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:12100:0::NO:: P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312226 (accessed 21 May 2013).
21.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (2002) Towards a policy for decent work. International Labour Review141: 161–174.
JamesPJohnstoneRQuinlanM (2007) Regulating supply chains to improve health and safety. Industrial Law Journal36: 163–187.
25.
MacklemPTrebilcockM (2006) New Labour Standards Compliance Strategies: Corporate Codes of Conduct and Social Labeling Programs, Ottawa: Federal Labour Standards.
26.
National Employment Law Project (NELP) (2010) Just pay: Improving wage and hour enforcement at the United States Department of Labour. NELP. Available at: http://www.nelp.org/page /-/Justice/2010/JustPayReport2010.pdf?nocdn=1 (accessed 21 May 2013).
ThomasMP (2007) Toyotaism meets the 60 hour work week: Coercion, ‘consent’ and the regulation of working time. Studies in Political Economy80: 105–128.
33.
ThomasMP (2009) Regulating Flexibility: The Political Economy of Employment Standards, Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
VoskoLF (2010) Managing the Margins: Gender, Citizenship and the International Regulation of Precarious Employment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
VoskoLF (2013) ‘Rights with remedies’: Enforcing employment standards in Ontario by maximizing voice among workers in precarious jobs. Osgoode Hall Law Journal50(4): 845–873.
37.
Vosko LF, Tucker E, Thomas MP, et al. (2011) New approaches to enforcement and compliance with labour regulatory standards: The case of Ontario, Canada. Social Science Research Network. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1975867 (accessed 21 May 2013).
38.
WeilD (2004) Individual rights and collective agents: The role of old and new workplace institutions in the regulation of labor markets. In: FreemanRHerschJMishelL (eds) Emerging Labor Market Institutions for the Twenty-first Century, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 13–44.
39.
WeilD (2012) ‘Broken windows,’ vulnerable workers, and the future of worker representation. The Forum10: 1–21.
40.
WeilDPylesA (2006) Why complain? Complaints, compliance, and the problem of enforcement in the U.S. workplace. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal59: 59–92.
