The John Lewis Partnership is one of Europe’s largest models of employee ownership and has been operating a form of employee involvement and participation since its formation in 1929. It is frequently held up as a model of best practice (Cathcart, 2013) and has been described as a ‘workers’ paradise’ (Stummer and Lacey, 2001). At the beginning of 2012, the Deputy Prime Minister of the UK unveiled plans to create a ‘John Lewis Economy’ (Wintour, 2012). As John Lewis is being positioned at the heart of political and media discussions in the UK about alternatives to the corporate capitalist model of enterprise, it is vital that more is known about the experience of employee involvement and participation within the organisation. This article explores the ways in which the practice of employee involvement and participation has changed in John Lewis as a result of competing employee and managerial interests. Its contribution is a contemporary exploration of participation in the John Lewis Partnership and an examination of the ways in which management and employees contested the meaning and practice of employee involvement and participation as part of a ‘democracy project’, which culminated in significant changes and degeneration of the democratic structures.
AlvessonMWillmottH (1992) On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review17(3): 432–463.
2.
BarskyA (2008) Understanding the ethical cost of organizational goal-setting: A review and theory development. Journal of Business Ethics81(1): 63–81.
3.
BernsteinP (1976) Necessary elements for worker participation in decision-making. Journal of Economic IssuesX(2): 490–522.
4.
Boden R, Ciancanelli P and Wright S (2011) Shopping around for a better way to operate? Try John Lewis. Times Higher Educational Supplement, 13 January.
5.
BrymanABellE (2003) Business Research Methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BullockATrombleyS(1999) Industrial democracy. In: BullockATrombleyS (eds) The New Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought, 3rd edn. London: Harper Collins Publishers.
7.
ButlerP (2009) ‘Riding along on the crest of a wave’: Tracking the shifting rationale for non-union consultation at Finance Co. Human Resource Management Journal19(2): 176–193.
8.
CathcartA (2006) A quite unreasonable state of affairs: Corporate Social Responsibility and the John Lewis Partnership. Social Responsibility Journal2(2): 201–206.
9.
Cathcart A (2010) Directing democracy: The case of the John Lewis Partnership. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Management, University of Leicester, Leicester, 331.
10.
Cathcart A (2013) Paradoxes of participation: Non-union workplace partnership in John Lewis. International Journal of Human Resource Management. Online First Article 15 January 2013. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2012.743476 1-19.
11.
CheneyG (1995) Democracy in the workplace: Theory and practice from the perspective of communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research23: 167–200.
12.
CheneyG (1999) Values at Work: Employee Participation Meets Market Pressure at Mondragon, New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
13.
ClokeKGoldsmithJ (2002) The End of Management and the Rise of Organizational Democracy, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, John Wiley.
14.
CookeBKothariU (2001) Participation: The New Tyranny?, London: Zed Books.
15.
CornforthC (1995) Patterns of cooperative management: Beyond the Degeneration thesis. Economic and Industrial Democracy16(4): 487–523.
16.
CoxAMarchingtonMSuterJ (2009) Employee involvement and participation: Developing the concept of institutional embeddedness using WERS2004. The International Journal of Human Resource Management20(10): 2150–2168.
17.
CresseyPEldridgeJMacInnesJ (1981) Participation prospects: Some Scottish evidence. Employment Gazette89(3): 117–123.
18.
DachlerHPWilpertB (1978) Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: A critical evaluation. Administrative Science Quarterly23(1): 1–39.
19.
DonagheyJCullinaneNDundonT (2011) Non-union employee representation, union avoidance and the managerial agenda. Economic and Industrial Democracy33(2): 163–183.
20.
DowG (1993) What do we know about social democracy?Economic and Industrial Democracy14: 11–48.
21.
DundonTWilkinsonA(2006) Employee participation. In: RedmanTWilkinsonA (eds) Contemporary Human Resource Management: Text and Cases, Essex: FT, Prentice Hall, pp. 382–404.
22.
DundonTWilkinsonAMarchingtonM (2004) The meanings and purpose of employee voice. The International Journal of Human Resource Management15(6): 1149–1170.
23.
GlaserBGStraussAL(2004) Theoretical sampling. In: SealeE (ed.) Social Research Methods: A Reader, London: Routledge.
24.
HadleyRGoldsmithM (1995) Development or convergence? Change and stability in a common ownership firm over three decades 1960–1989. Economic and Industrial Democracy16: 167–199.
25.
Henley J (2010) Is John Lewis the best company in Britain to work for? The Guardian, 16 March.
26.
John Lewis Partnership (1928) The Constitution of the John Lewis Partnership 1928, London: John Lewis and Company Limited.
27.
John Lewis Partnership (1953) The John Lewis Partnership: A Brief Description, London: John Lewis and Company Ltd.
28.
John Lewis Partnership (2000) The Constitution of the John Lewis Partnership: Introduction, Principles and Rules, 3rd edn. London: John Lewis and Company Limited.
29.
John Lewis Partnership (2012) The Constitution of the John Lewis Partnership: Introduction, Principles and Rules, London: John Lewis and Company Ltd.
JohnstoneSWilkinsonAAckersP (2004) Partnership paradoxes: A case study of an energy company. Employee Relations26(4): 353–376.
32.
KerrJL (2004) The limits of organizational democracy. Academy of Management Executive18(3): 81–95.
33.
Kingsley P (2012) What exactly is the John Lewis model? The Guardian: Shortcuts, 25 July.
34.
LewisJS (1948) Partnership for All: A Thirty-Four Year Old Experiment in Industrial Democracy, London: Kerr-Cross Publishing.
35.
LewisJS (1954) Fairer Shares: A Possible Advance in Civilization and Perhaps the Only Alternative to Communism, London: Staples Press Ltd.
36.
LockeK (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research, London: SAGE.
37.
McKinlayA (2002) ‘Dead selves’: The birth of the modern career. Organization9(4): 595–614.
38.
ManganA (2009) Exploring self-discipline, subjectivity and co-operative work. Human Relations62(1): 93–117.
39.
Marchington M, Goodman J, Wilkinson A, et al. (1992) New developments in employee involvement. Employment Department Group Research Series No. 2. Manchester: Manchester School of Management, UMIST, 85.
40.
MarchingtonMWilkinsonAAckersP (1994) Understanding the meaning of participation: Views from the workplace. Human Relations47(8): 867–894.
41.
MintzbergH (1983) Why America needs, but cannot have, corporate democracy. Organizational DynamicsSpring: 5–20.
42.
NgCWNgE (2009) Balancing the democracy dilemmas: Experiences of three women workers’ cooperatives in Hong Kong. Economic and Industrial Democracy30(2): 182–206.
43.
OakeshottR (2000) Jobs and Fairness: The Logic and Experience of Employee Ownership, Norwich: Michael Russell (Publishing) Ltd.
44.
Pooler M (2012) Knowingly underpaid? John Lewis hit by cleaners’ protest. The Independent, 27 June.
45.
RamsayH (1977a) Cycles of control: Worker participation in sociological and historical perspective. Sociology11(3): 481–506.
46.
RamsayH (1977b) Participation: The shop floor view. British Journal of Industrial Relations14: 128–141.
47.
RamsayH (1980) Phantom participation: Patterns of power and conflict. Industrial Relations Journal11(3): 46–59.
48.
ReidD(1995) The partners. In: LambertS (ed.) BBC Modern Times, UK: British Broadcasting Corporation.
49.
ReidKGriffithJ (2006) Social enterprise mythology: Critiquing some assumptions. Social Enterprise Journal2(1): 1–10.
50.
Rothschild-WhittJ (1979) The collectivist organization: An alternative to rational-bureaucratic models. American Sociological Review44(4): 509–527.
51.
Rothschild-WhittJLindenfeldF(1982) Reshaping work: Prospects and problems of workplace democracy. In: Rothschild-WhittJLindenfeldF (eds) Workplace Democracy and Social Change, Boston: Porter-Sargent, pp. 1–18.
52.
SatowRL (1975) Value-rational authority and professional organizations: Weber’s missing type. Administrative Science Quarterly20(4): 526–531.
53.
SauserWI (2009) Sustaining employee-owned companies: Seven recommendations. Journal of Business Ethics84(2): 151–164.
54.
SealeC (2004) Social Research Methods: A Reader, London: Routledge.
55.
StewartPLewchukWYatesC(2004) Patterns of labour control and the erosion of labour standards: Towards an international study of the quality of working life in the automobile industry (Canada, Japan and the UK). In: CharronEStewartP (eds) Work and Employment Relations in the Automobile Industry, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 258–290.
56.
StohlCCheneyG (2001) Participatory processes/paradoxical practices: Communication and dilemmas of organisational democracy. Management Communication Quarterly14(3): 349–407.
57.
StraussALCorbinJ(1990) Open coding. In: SealeC (ed.) Social Research Methods: A Reader, London: Routledge.
58.
Stummer R and Lacey H (2001) John Lewis reinvented as ‘retail theatre’. The Independent, 25 February.
59.
TeaguePHannD (2010) Problems with partnership at work: Lessons from an Irish case study. Human Resource Management Journal20(1): 100–114.
60.
Townsend K, Wilkinson A and Burgess J (2013a) Filling the gaps: Patterns of formal and informal voice. Economic and Industrial Democracy. Online First Article 7 June 2012. DOI: 10.1177/0143831X12448442.
61.
TurnerL (1997) Participation, democracy and efficiency in the US workplace. Industrial Relations Journal28(4): 309–313.
62.
UpchurchMRichardsonMTailbyS (2006) Employee representation and partnership in the non-union sector: A paradox of intention?Human Resource Management Journal16(4): 393–410.
63.
VarmanRChakrabartiM (2004) Contradictions of democracy in a workers’ cooperative. Organization Studies25(2): 183–208.
64.
WarnerM(1984) Organizational democracy: The history of an idea. In: WilpertBSorgeA (eds) International Perspectives on Organizational Democracy, London: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 5–21.
65.
WebbSWebbB (1902) Industrial Democracy, London: Longmans, Green & Co.
66.
WeberM (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, New York, NY: The Free Press.
67.
WilkinsonAGollanPJMarchingtonM(2010) Conceptualizing employee participation in organizations. In: LewinDMarchingtonMGollanPJ (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Participation in Organizations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–23.
68.
Wilkinson A, Townsend K, Burgess J (2013) Reassessing employee involvement and participation: Atrophy, reinvigoration and patchwork in Australian workplaces. Journal of Industrial Relations 55(4). DOI: 10.1177/0022185613489419.
69.
Wintour P (2012) Nick Clegg pushes ‘John Lewis’-style economy. The Guardian, 15 January.
