Using the Korea Workplace Panel Survey data, this study examines the extent of diffusion of family-friendly programmes in Korean workplaces and the effect the programmes have on organizational performance, including employee turnover, labour productivity, and labour—management relations, under the presence and moderation of high performance work systems (HPWS) practices. The diffusion of family-friendly management in Korean firms has been very limited in comparison with British workplaces, despite the Korean government’s policy efforts to promote greater work—family balance. Our analysis reveals that family-friendly programmes do not always benefit firms. Dependent care programmes are beneficial for organizational performance to a certain degree, whereas flexible work schedules are not effective in reducing turnover, exhibiting a negative effect on labour productivity. However, flextime practice in Korea differs to a certain extent from western countries, where employees are allowed to flexibly alter their working schedules to promote work—family integration. Furthermore, family-friendly programmes in Korea do not complement HPWS practices in the enhancement of organizational performance.
Batt, R. and Valcour, M. ( 2003) ‘Human Resources Practices as Predictors of Work-Family Outcomes and Employee Turnover’, Industrial Relations42(2): 189-220.
2.
Beauregard, A. and Henry, L.(2009) ‘Making the Link between Work-Life Balance Practices and Organizational Performance’, Human Resource Management Review19: 9-22.
3.
Berg, P., Kalleberg, A. and Appelbaum, E. ( 2003) ‘Balancing Work and Family: The Role of High Commitment Environment’, Industrial Relations42: 168-88.
4.
Bloom, N. and Van Reenen, J. ( 2006) ‘Management Practices, Work-Life Balance, and Productivity: A Review of some Recent Evidence’, Oxford Review of Economics22(4): 457-82.
5.
Cho, S.G. and Oh, Y.S. ( 2003) ‘The Making of Precondition for Compressed Economic Growth: The Formation of Korean Capitalist Regime in 1950s’ , Journal of Korean Social Science59: 258-302 (in Korean).
6.
Clifton, T. and Shepard, E. ( 2004) ‘Work and Family Programs and Productivity: Estimates Applying a Production Function Model’, International Journal of Manpower25(8): 714-28.
7.
Davis, A. and Kalleberg, A. ( 2006) ‘Family-friendly Organizations?: Work and Family Programs in the 1990s’, Work and Occupations33(2): 191-223.
8.
Den Dulk, L. ( 2005) ‘Workplace Work-Family Arrangements: A Study and Explanatory Framework of Differences between Organizational Provisions in Different Welfare States’, in S. Poelmans (ed.) Work and Family: An International Research Perspective , pp. 211-38. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
Dex, S. and Smith, C. ( 2002) The Nature and Pattern of Family-friendly Employment Policies in Britain. Bristol: Policy Press .
10.
Drago, R. and Hyatt, D. ( 2003) ‘Symposium: The Effect of Work-Family Policies on Employees and Employers’, Industrial Relations42(2): 139-44.
11.
Giardini, A. and Kabst, R. ( 2008) ‘Effects of Work-Family Human Resource Practices: A Longitudinal Perspective’, International Journal of Human Resource Management19(11): 2079-94.
12.
Gregory, A. and Milner, S. (2009) ‘Work-Life Balance : a Matter of Choice’, Gender, Work and Organization16(1): 1-13.
13.
Heiland, F. and Macpherson, D. ( 2005) ‘Do Family-friendly Firms Perform Better?’ , mimeo.
14.
Kersley, B., Alpin, C., Forth, J., Bryson, A., Bewley, H., Dix, G. and Oxenbridge, S. ( 2006) Inside the Workplace: Findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey. New York: Routledge.
15.
Kim, H.W., Kim, K.H., Kim, H.A. and Yu, G.S. ( 2007) A Study on Family-friendly Employment Policies in Korea . Seoul: KIHSA.
16.
Kim, S.M. ( 2008) ‘Women and Family-friendly Policies in the Korean Government’, International Review of Administrative Sciences74(3): 463-76.
17.
Konrad, A.M. and Mangel, R. ( 2000) ‘The Impact of Work-Life Programs on Firm Productivity’ , Strategic Management Journal21(12): 1225-37.
18.
Kossek, E. and Nichol, V. ( 1992) ‘The Effects of On-site Child Care on Employee Attitudes and Performance’, Personnel Psychology45(3): 485-509.
19.
Lee, B.H. and Kim, J.S.(2009) ‘A Study on Organizational Outcomes of Family-friendly Management in Korea’, Korean Journal of Industrial Relations19(2): 153-75.
20.
Lobel, S. ( 1999) ‘Impacts of Diversity and Work-Life Initiatives in Organizations’, in G. Powell (ed.) Handbook of Gender and Work, pp. 453-76. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
Narayanan, V. and Nath, R. ( 1982) ‘A Field Test of Some Attitudinal and Behavioral Consequences of Flextime’, Journal of Applied Psychology67: 214-18.
22.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009) 2009 OECD Employment Outlook: Tackling the Jobs Crisis. Paris: OECD Publications .
23.
Osterman, P. ( 1995) ‘Work/Family Programs and the Employment Relationship’ , Administrative Science Quarterly40: 681-700.
24.
Perry-Smith, J. and Blum, T. ( 2000) ‘Work-Family Human Resource Bundles and Perceived Organizational Performance’, Academy of Management Journal43(6): 1107-17.
25.
Pierce, J. and Newstrom, J. (1983) ‘The Design of Flexible Work Schedules and Employee Responses: Relationships and Processes’, Journal of Occupational Behavior4: 247-62.
26.
Poelmans, S. and Sahibzada, K. ( 2004) ‘A Multi-level Model for Studying the Context and Impact of Work-Family Policies and Culture in Organizations’, Human Resource Management Review14: 409-31.
27.
Rousseau, D. ( 1995) Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
28.
Wood, S., de Menezes, L. and Lasaosa, A. ( 2003) ‘Family-friendly Management in Great Britain: Testing Various Perspectives’, Industrial Relations42(2): 221-50.
29.
Yanadori, Y. and Kato, T.(2009) ‘Work and Family Practices in Japanese Firms: Their Scope, Nature and Impact on Employee Turnover’, International Journal of Human Resource Management20(2): 439-56.
30.
Yoo, G.S. ( 2007) ‘Implementation and Utilization of Family-friendly Corporate Policies, Employees’ Job Satisfaction, Turnover Intentions and Work Performance’, Family and Culture19(2): 35-59 (in Korean).
31.
Yoo, G.C. and Kim, H.A. ( 2006) ‘A Study on Determinants Influencing Adopting Maternity Protection Policies in Korean Firms and their Impact on the Firms’ Performance’ , Quarterly Journal of Labor Policy6(2): 97-129 (in Korean).
