The Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Act 2005 changes the architecture of labour market regulation in Australia in a significant way. The focus of this article is on changes to the regulatory framework for minimum wage determination and the rationale for, and likely consequences of, conferring this power on the Australian Fair Pay Commission. Underpinning the Work Choices package is the view that Safety Net wage rises awarded by the Australian Industrial Relations Commission have had negative effects on employment. In this article we establish that the evidence to support this claim is weak, and is being used to engineer a historic shift in the objectives of the Australian wage setting process. We argue that the new legislation will act as a downward drag on the pay and conditions of minimum wage workers and advance an alternative policy approach in which attaining full employment does not require us to abandon the principle of fairness or a decent wage floor.
Andrews, K. (2005) `Work Choices Funding: Australian Fair Pay Commission' , Media Statement by the Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations, 328/05.
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2004 ) Disability, Ageing and Carers, Australia, Cat. no. 4430.0 , September. Canberra: ABS.
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2005 ) The Labour Force, Australia, Cat. no. 6203.0, October. Canberra: ABS.
4.
Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) ( 2004) ACTU Minimum Wage Case 2004: Written Reply Submission , ACTU, March.
5.
Australian Fair Pay Commission (AFCP) (2006 ) Wage-Setting Decision and Reasons for Decision, October, AGPS, Canberra.
6.
Australian Government (2005) Work Choices: A New Workplace Relations System, Commonwealth of Australia , October.
7.
Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) (2003) `Safety Net Review: Wages', Decision and Statement, AIRC, May.
8.
Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) (2004) `Safety Net Review: Wages', Decision and Statement, AIRC, May.
9.
Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) (2005) `Safety Net Review: Wages', Decision and Statement, AIRC, June.
10.
Baker, D., Glyn, A., Howell, D. and Schmitt, J. (2004) `Labor Market Institutions and Unemployment', in D. Howell (ed.) Questioning Liberalization: Unemployment, Labor Markets, and the Welfare State. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
11.
Briggs, C. and Buchanan, J. (2005) `Work, Commerce and Law: A New Australian Model? ', Australian Economic Review38(2): 182—91.
12.
Buddelmeyer, H., Dawkins, P., Freebairn, J. and Kalb, G. (2004) Bracket Creep, E fective Marginal Tax Rates and Alternative Tax Packages, Report by The Melbourne Institute in association withThe Australian.
13.
Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE) ( 2005) CofFEE Labour Market Indicators, August accessed 10 January 2005http://e1.newcastle.edu.au/coffee/indicators/indicators.cfm
14.
Commonwealth of Australia (2005) Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Act, 2005.
15.
Dawkins, P. (2005) `Do We Need a Low Pay Commission in Australia?' , Mimeo: Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University. http://econrsss.anu.edu.au/pdf/dawkins2.pdf Accessed 3 October 2007.
16.
Department of the Parliamentary Library (2005 ) Workplace Relations Reforms: A Chronology of Business, Community and Government Responses, October. Parliament of Australia .
17.
Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR) (2005) Answer to Question on Notice W319—06. 2005—06 Budget Senate Estimates Hearing. Senate Employment, Workplace Relations and Education Legislation Committee: May.
18.
Dixon, P.B., Madden, J.R. and Rimmer, M.T. (2005) The E fects on the Australian Economy of a Sustained Increase In Award Wage Rates: Results from the MONASH Model. Monash University: Centre ofPolicy Studies.
19.
Freeman, R. (2005) `Labour Market Institutions without Blinders: The Debate over Flexibility and Labour Market Performance', International Economic Journal19(2): 129—45.
20.
Harding, D. and Harding, G. (2004) Minimum Wages in Australia: An Analysis of the Impact on Small and Medium Sized Businesses, March. Canberra : Department of Employment and Workplace Relations.
21.
Howard, J. (2005) `Workplace Relations Reform and Apprenticeships' , Prime Minister's Media Statement, Canberra, 20 September.
22.
Howe, J., Mitchell, R., Murray, J., O'Donnell, A. and Patmore, G. (2005) `The Coalition's Proposed Industrial Relations Changes: An Interim Assessment', Australian Bulletin of Labour31(3): 189—210.
23.
LaJeunesse, R., Mitchell, W.F. and Watts, M.J. (2006) `The Economics of Industrial Relations Reform', in J. Teicher, R. Lambert and A. O'Rourke (eds) Work Choices: The New Industrial Relations Agenda, pp. 123—41. Melbourne: Prentice Hall.
24.
Low Pay Commission (2005) National Minimum Wage: Low Pay Commission Report, February. London : Low Pay Commission.
25.
Leigh, A. (2003) `Employment Effects of Minimum Wages: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment', Australian Economic Review36(4): 361—73.
26.
Macken, J.D. (2006) Macken on Work Choices. Sydney : Lawbook.
27.
Mitchell, W.F. (1998) `The Buffer Stock Employment Model: Full Employment without a NAIRU', Journal of Economic Issues32(2): 547—55.
28.
Mitchell, W.F. (2005a) `Industrial Relations Changes: The Final Demise of a “Fair Go” Society!', New Matilda (May).
29.
Mitchell, W.F. (2005b) `Safety Net Review of Wages: Critique of Madden, Dixon and Rimmer', Minimum Wages Case 2005, Reply Composite Exhibit, R4.
30.
Mitchell, W.F., Cowling, S. and Watts, M.J. (2003) A Community Development Job Guarantee: A New Paradigm in Employment Policy, Policy Discussion Report, Centre of Full Employment and Equity, April.
31.
One Hundred and Fifty One Australian Industrial Relations, Labour Market and Legal Academics (2005) `Research Evidence about the Effects of the “Work Choices” Bill', Submission to the Senate Employment, Workplace Relations and Education Committee Inquiry into the Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices Bill 2005, November.
32.
Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1994) Jobs Study. Paris : OECD.
33.
Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2001) Innovations in Labour Market Policies, The Australian Way. Paris: OECD .
34.
Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2004) Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.
35.
Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2006) Employment Outlook: Boosting Jobs and Incomes. Paris: OECD.
36.
Palley, T.I. (1998) `Restoring Prosperity: Why the U.S. Model is not the Answer for the United States or Europe', Journal of Post Keynesian Economics20(3): 337—53.
37.
Richardson, S. and Harding, A. (1999) `Poor Workers?: The Link between Low wages, Low Family Income and the Tax and Transfer Systems', in S. Richardson (ed.) Reshaping the Labour Market: Regulation, E ficiency and Equality in Australia, pp. 122—58. Melbourne : Cambridge University Press.
38.
Teicher, J., O'Rourke, A. and Pyman, A. (2006) `Abolishing the Independent Umpire: The Demise of Equity', in J. Teicher, R. Lambert and A. O'Rourke (eds) Work Choices: The New Industrial Relations Agenda , pp. 142—59. Melbourne: Prentice Hall.
39.
Thurow, L. (1983) Dangerous Currents: The State of Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
