This article discusses the concept of nondirectivity in person-centered theory. It argues that, since personal and theoretical biases are unavoidable, it is impossible for a therapist to be consistently nondirective. Furthermore, the concept of nondirectivity, with its focus on the psychology of the client, implies that person-centered therapy is a one-person rather than a two-person psychology. The article quotes therapists who believe that when a client’s autonomy is respected, a wide variety of therapeutic interventions are possible. The argument is made that therapist fallibility may be a more relevant concept than nondirectivity. With the fallibility of the therapist and a respect for the autonomy of the client, therapeutic responses can become more flexible and innovative, increasing the power of the person-centered approach with its unique and admirable democratic ideals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beebe, B.
, & Lachmann, F. M. (1992). The contribution of mother-infant mutual influence to the origins of self- and object representations. In N. J. Skolnick & S. C. Warshaw (Eds.), Relational Perspectives in Psychoanalysis (pp. 83-117). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
2.
Bohart, A. C.
(1998). Review of the book Successful psychotherapy: A caring, loving relationship. Person-Centered Journal, 5, 66-70.
3.
Bozarth, J. D.
(1997). Empathy from the framework of client-centered theory and the Rogerian hypothesis. In A. C. Bohart & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (pp. 81-102). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4.
Brodley, B. T.
(1997). The nondirective attitude in client-centered therapy. Person-Centered Journal, 4, 18-30.
5.
Cain, D. J.
(1989). The paradox of nondirectiveness in the person-centered approach. Person-Centered Review, 4, 123-131.
6.
Cain, D. J.
(1990). Further thoughts about nondirectiveness and client-centered therapy. Person-Centered Review, 5, 89-99.
7.
Eagle, M.
(1993). Enactments, transference, and symptomatic cure: A case history. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 3, 93-110.
8.
Gendlin, E. T.
(1974). Client-centered and experiential psychotherapy. In D. Wexler & L. N. Rice (Eds.), Innovations in client-centered therapy(pp. 211-246). New York: John Wiley.
9.
Gendlin, E. T.
(1988). Carl Rogers (1902-1987) [Obituary]. American Psychologist, 43, 127-128.
10.
Kahn, E.
(1985). Heinz Kohut and Carl Rogers: A timely comparison. American Psychologist, 40, 893-904.
11.
Kahn, E.
(1989). Carl Rogers and Heinz Kohut: Toward a constructive collaboration. Psychotherapy, 26, 555-563.
12.
Kahn, E.
(1996). The intersubjective perspective and the client-centered approach: Are they one at their core?Psychotherapy, 33, 30-42.
13.
Kahn, E.
(1998). Carl Rogers, more relevant today than Freud. Psychotherapy Bulletin: Official Publication of Division 29 of the American Psychological Association, 33, 35-36.
14.
Kohut, H.
(1981, October). On empathy. Address delivered at the Fourth Annual Conference on the Psychology of the Self, Berkeley, CA.
15.
Kohut, H.
(1984). How does analysis cure? (A. Goldberg & P. E. Stepansky, Eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Macy, F. U.
(1987). The legacy of Carl Rogers in the U.S.S.R. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 27(3), 305-308.
17.
Miller, J. P.
(1985, October). Introductory address. In J. P. Miller (Chair), Frontiers in clinical theory and metapsychology. Symposium conducted at the Eighth Annual Conference on the Psychology of the Self, New York.
18.
Orange, D. M.
(1994). Countertransference, empathy, and the hermeneutical circle. In R. D. Stolorow, G. E. Atwood, & B. Brandchaft (Eds.), The intersubjective perspective (pp. 177-186). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
19.
Orange, D. M.
(1995). Emotional understanding: Studies in psychoanalytic epistemology. New York: Guilford.
20.
Raskin, N. J.
(1988). Responses to person-centered vs client-centered?Renaissance, 5, 2-3.
21.
Renik, O.
(1993). Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 62, 553-571.
22.
Rogers, C. R.
(1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
23.
Rogers, C. R.
(1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24.
Rogers, C. R.
(1980). A way of being. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
25.
Rogers, C. R.
(1987). Inside the world of the Soviet professional. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 27(3), 277-304.
26.
Rogers, C. R.
, & Sanford, R. C. (1984). Client-centered psychotherapy. In H. I. Kaplan & B. J. Sadock (Eds.), Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (Vol. 4, pp. 1374-1388). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
27.
Stern, D. N.
(1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.
28.
Stolorow, R. D.
(1994). The intersubjective context of intrapsychic experience. In R. D. Stolorow, G. E. Atwood, & B. Brandchaft (Eds.), The intersubjective perspective (pp. 3-14). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
29.
Stolorow, R. D.
, & Atwood, G. E. (1992). Contexts of being: The intersubjective foundations of psychological life. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
30.
Stolorow, R. D.
, Brandchaft, B., & Atwood, G. E. (1987). Psychoanalytic treatment: An intersubjective approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
31.
Swenson, G. L.
(1987). When personal and political processes meet: The Rust Workshop. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 27(3), 309-332.
32.
Tobin, S. A.
(1991). A comparison of psychoanalytic self psychology and Carl Rogers’s person-centered therapy. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 31(1), 9-33.
33.
Warner, M.
(1998, May). Person-centered psychotherapy: One nation, many tribes. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Meeting of the Association for the Development of the Person-Centered Approach, Wheaton College, Norton, MA.
34.
Wolf, E. S.
(1986, October). [Discussant]. In H. Linden (Chair), Clinical advances in self psychology. Symposium conducted at the Ninth Annual Conference on the Psychology of the Self, San Diego, CA.
