This article presents a definitional and theoretical critique of Mittelman's notion of openness. An alternative conceptualization of self-actualizers as exemplars of loosely coupled personality systems is introduced. This loosely coupled personality system notion allows for a dialectical model of self-actualizers that might resolve seeming personality dichotomies, such as concurtently high levels of both openness and closedness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Maslow, A.
(1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
2.
Maslow, A.
(1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Viking.
3.
Mittelman, W.
(1991). Maslow's study of self-actualization: A reinterpretation. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 31(1), 114-135.
4.
Mittelman, W.
(1992). Openness and self-actualization: Areply to Tbbacyk and Miller. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 32(2), 137-142.
5.
Orton, J.
, & Weick, K. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203-223.
6.
Popper, K.
(1968). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper & Row.
7.
Tobacyk, J.
(1993). Self-reflective consciousness and optimal psychological functioning. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 33(1), 110-112.
8.
Tobacyk, J.
, & Miller, M. (1991). Comment on "Maslow's study of self-actualization."Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 31(4), 96-98.
9.
Weick, K.
(1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-21.
