Abstract
This article sets forth two historically important ways in which the transcendence of the ego has been conceived. These two conceptions are called the "ladder to oneness" and the "spiral to integration." These conceptions are set forth by contrasting them on five critical issues: (1) whether transcendence is a developmental transition that moves straight to higher, transegoic levels or a transition that follows a spiral course that bends back upon itself, (2) whether transcendence is a purely progressive movement or a movement that involves regression at some point, (3) whether transcendence is a wholly immanent process or a process that involves contact with transcendent forces, (4) whether transcendence is primarily a matter of growth from within or transformation from without, and (5) whether transcendence ultimately leads beyond all selfhood or to a point at which a higher form of selfhood is achieved. Drawing on these contrasts, two general conclusions are drawn: (1) the two conceptions of transcendence reflect basic differences in Eastern (ladder to oneness) and Western (spiral to integration) perspectives, and (2) the two conceptions are logically at odds on certain fundamental points, which suggests poor prospects for a unified East/West paradigm of transcendence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
