This essay is specifically a critique of Kirk's Schneider's "The Deified Self: A'Centaur' Response to Wilber and the Transpersonal Movement," but it also discusses and summarizes the essentials of the ongoing debate between existential-humanistic psychology and transpersonal psychology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ellis, A.
(1986). Fanaticism that may lead to a nuclear holocaust: The contributions of scientific counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling and Development, 65.
2.
Hegel, G.
(1949). Phenomenology of mind (J. Bailli, Trans.). New York.
3.
Jantsch, E.
, & Waddington, C. (Eds.). (1976). Evolution and consciousness. Belmont, CA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
May, R.
(1986). The argument against. The Common Boundary, 4(2).
5.
Schneider, K.
(1987, Spring). The deified self: A "centaur" response to Wilber and the transpersonal movement. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 27(2).
6.
Wilber, K.
(1980). The atrman project. Wheaton, IL: Quest.
7.
Wilber, K.
(1981a). No boundary. Boulder, CO: Shambhala.
8.
Wilber, K.
(1981b). Up From Eden. New York: Doubleday/Anchor.
9.
Wilber, K.
(1982). A sociable god. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Wilber, K.
(1983). Eye to eye. New York: Doubleday/Anchor.
11.
Wilber, K.
(1989, Spring). Two humanistic psychologies? A response. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 29(2), 230-243.
12.
Wilber, K.
(in press). Response to Albert Ellis. Journal of Counseling and Development.
13.
Wilber, K.
, Engler, J., and Brown, D. (1986). Transformations of consciousness. Boulder, CO: Shambhala.
