Abstract
Contemporary theories of the evolution of human consciousness vary with respect to the nature of the direction and assumed goal of evolutionary change. The most conspicuous positions on this issue emphasize what the author has called the modes of efficiency, inner harmony, relatedness, and transcendence. Nearly every theorist posits a universal course of change corresponding to one of these modes. Available evidence on historical developments in different cultures does not support such a position. It is more reasonable to assume many possible evolutionary pathways, but there may be a natural tendency for the pathways to converge ultimately toward a condition of flexible access to all modes of consciousness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
