Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The attribution to another country of responsibility for the failures and perils of one's own society is a tradition, if not an accepted norm, in the conduct of international relations. There is, as yet, nothing analogous in the international political realm to the assumption of personal responsibility that is expected in working therapeutically with individuals, families, and other groups. Yet the destructive properties of thermonuclear weapons, and other world-uniting nuclear-age technologies, have made obsolete and dangerous habitually ignoring the contributions of one's own nation to international political tensions. The necessity of creating a transnational paradigm that includes the assumption of political self-responsibility by a nation and its leaders is argued here. The obstacles that stand in the way of political responsibility are examined, and possible steps for bringing this new paradigm into being are considered. One important project, the American-Soviet Film Initiative (ASFI), in which an industry has taken major steps toward achieving global political responsibility, is described in detail.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison, G. I. , Carnesale, A. , & Nye, J., Jr. (Eds.). (1985). Hawks, doves and owls: An agendafor avoiding nuclear war. New York: Norton.

Archer, D. (1986). University management of weapons labs? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 2(1), 41-44.

Bakan, D. (1982). The interface between war and the social sciences. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 22(1), 19-42.

Blight, J. (1987). Toward a policy relevant psychology of avoiding nuclear war: Lessons for psychologists from the Cuban missile crisis. American Psychologist 42(1), 12-29.

Coffman, B. (1988). Association for Responsible Communication, 20110 Rockport Way, Malibu, CA 90265.

Dostoevsky F. (1933). The brothers Karamazov. New York: Modern Library.

Frank, J. (1982). Prenuclear-age leaders and the nuclear arms race. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 54(4), 630-637.

Frank, J. , & Rivard, J. C. (1986). Antinuclear admirals: An interview study. Political Psychology 7(1), 23-52.

Greenwald, J. (1987, February 16). Travelers to a changing land. Time, pp. 34-35.

10.

Holt, R. (1984). Can psychology meet Einstein's challenge? Political Psychology 5(2), 199-225.

11.

Janis, I. L. (1972). Victime of group think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

12.

Kortunov, A. (1988). Realism and morality in politics. In A. Gromyko & M. Melman (Eds.), Breakthrough: Emerging new thinking. New York: Walker.

13.

Kull, S. (1985). Nuclear nonsense. Foreign Policy 58(Spring), 28-52.

14.

Mack, J. E. (1987, February 15). Amerika: An irresponsible TV series. New York Times, p. E21-E21.

15.

Montville, J. V. (1982). The psychological roots of violence and terrorism in Northern Ireland (Report 491). Washington, DC: Department of State, AR Bureau of Intelligence and Research.

16.

Montville, J. V. (in press). Psychoanalytic enlightenment and the greening of diplomacy (plenary address at the midwinter meeting of the American Psychoanalytic Association, December 19, 1986). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

17.

Nedelmann, C. (in press). Lessons for the nuclear age: Psychoanalysis in Germany 1933-1945 and today (paper presented at the 9th Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Amsterdam, July 3). Political Psychology.

18.

Pankin, A. (1987). New thinking, openness and soviet peace movement. 20th Century and Peace, May, 29-33.

19.

Rosenthal, A. M. (1987, February 5). The wrong question. New York Times.

20.

Smith, J. (1987). Reagan Star Wars, American culture. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 43(1), 19-25.

21.

Steiner, P. (1987, September). Aspects of the group dynamics of strategic nuclear policymaking: A case study. Unpublished paper.

22.

White, R. K. (1983). Empathizing with the rulers of the USSR. Political Psychology 4(1), 121-127.

23.

White, R. K. (1987). The kind of empathy needed in arms control negotiation, The American Journal of Social Psychiatry 3(Summer), 181-184.

The Challenge of Political Self-Responsibility in the Nuclear Age

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References