Heuristic Inquiry

Abstract

This article is a presentation of heuristics as an approach to human science research. In its purest form, heuristics is a passionate and discerning personal involvement in problem solving, an effort to know the essence of some aspect of life through the internal pathways of the self. The private and imaginative nature of heuristic inquiry introduces a unique challenge in research investigations and in philosophical conceptualizations of human science. When utilized as a framework for research, it offers a disciplined pursuit of essential meanings connected with everyday human experiences. Through discussion of its inherent processes and values, we hope to develop a fresh perspective for the understanding and application of a heuristic approach to scientific investigation. Our aim is to awaken and inspire researchers to make contact with and respect their own questions and problems, to suggest a process that affirms imagination, intuition, self-reflection, and the tacit dimension as valid ways in the search for knowledge and understanding. We do not intend for this article to present a "how-to-do" focus. We believe that that competence and skill can be learned only through practice. We also do not plan to include summaries of completed heuristic research. A few such studies are included in our reference list (Craig, 1978; Jourard, 1968; Moustakas, 1975; Pearce, 1971. A list of the titles of heuristic studies completed by graduates of the former Merrill-Palmer Institute and the Center for Humanistic Studies in Detroit, Michigan are available through the senior author of this article.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beveridge, W. I. B. (1957). The art of scientific investigation. New York: Vintage Books.

Boyd, E. M. , & Fales, A. W. (1983). Reflective learning: Key to learning from experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23 (2), 99-117.

Bridgman, P. W. (1955). Reflections of a physicist. New York: Philosophical Library.

Bridgman, P. W. (1959). The way things are. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Buber, M. (1965). Between man and man. New York: Macmillan.

Combs, A. W. , Richards, A. C. , & Richards, F. (1976). Perceptual psychology. New York: Harper & Row.

Craig, P. E. (1978). The heart of the teacher: A heuristic study of the inner world of teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.

Gendlin, E. (1978). Focusing. New York: Bantam.

Jourard, S. (1968). Disclosing man to himself. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

10.

Jourard, S. (1971). Self-disclosure. New York: John Wiley.

11.

Kierkegaard, S. (1941). Concluding unscientific postcript (D. F. Swanson & Lowrie, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

12.

Maslow, A. H. (1956). Self-actualizing people: A study of psychological health. In C. Moustakas (Ed.), The self. New York: Harper & Row.

13.

Moustakas, C. E. (1961). Loneliness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

14.

Moustakas, C. E. (1975). The touch of loneliness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

15.

Pearce, J. C. (1971). The crack in the cosmic egg. New York: Pocket Books.

16.

Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

17.

Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

18.

Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

19.

Polkinghorne, D. (1982). What makes research humanistic? Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 22 (3),47-54.

20.

Polya, G. (1962). Mathematical discovery (Vol. 1). New York: John Wiley.

21.

Polya, G. (1965). Mathematical discovery (Vol. 2). New York: John Wiley.

22.

Reason, P. , & Rowan, J. (Eds.) (1981). Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research. New York: John Wiley.

23.

Rogers, C. R. (1969). Toward a science of the person. In A. J. Sutich & M. A. Vich (Eds.), Readings in humanistic psychology. New York: Free Press.