Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The question as to how much mutuality is possible and desirable between therapist and client transcends the bounds of orthodox psychoanalysis as it focuses on the real interhuman relationship between the two and not just on "transference" and "countertransference." Within this relationship there is mutuality of contact, trust, and common concern with the client's problems. However, as Martin Buber said in his dialogue with Carl Rogers in 1957, the therapist must experience the client's side of the relationship and imagine concretely what the client is thinking, feeling, and willing, but the client cannot be expected to practice "inclusion" with the therapist. This article surveys a wide range of practice and theory concerning mutuality from Freud and his followers to such therapists as Carl Rogers, Sidney Jourard, Frieda Fromm-Reichmann, Harold Searles, Margaret Sechaheye, Harry Guntrip, and Marvin Spiegelman. It concludes that the rejection of "mirrorlike impassivity" on the part of the therapist should not lead to a sentimental blurring of the essential distinction between therapy and less structured types of I-Thou relationships in which there are no normative limitations of mutuality. Yet the therapist is not only professionally accountable, but is personally responsible, even though the responsibility for whether the therapy works is ultimately a matter of the "between."

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archambeau, E. (1979). Beyond countertransference: The psychotherapist's experience of healing in the therapeutic relationship. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, San Diego.

Basescu, S. (1977). Anxieties in the analyst, an autobiographical account. In K. A. Frank (Ed.), The human dimension of psychoanalytic practice (pp. 153-164). New York: Grune & Stratton.

Blank, G. , & Blank, R. (1979). Ego psychology II: Psychoanalytic developmental psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.

Buber, M. (1958). I and thou (2nd rev. ed., R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Scribner.

Buber, M. (1965). Between man and man (R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.

Buber, M. (1966). The knowledge of man: A philosphy of the interhuman ( M. Friedman , Ed., R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.

Colm, H. (1965). The therapeutic encounter. Review of Existential Psychology and Psychiatry, 5, 137-159.

Farber, L. (1967). Martin Buber and psychotherapy. In P. A. Schilpp & M. Friedman (Eds.), The philosophy of Martin Buber. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.

Frank, K. A. (Ed.). (1977). The human dimension in psychoanalytic practice. New York: Grune & Stratton.

10.

Fromm-Reichmann, F. (1950). Principles of intensive psychotherapy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

11.

Greban, S. E. (1983). Bad theater in psychotherapy: The case for therapists' liberation. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 37, 69-76.

12.

Guntrip, H. (1977). My experience of analysis with Fairbairn and Winnicott (How complete a result does psycho-analytic therapy achieve?). In K. A. Frank (Ed.), The human dimension in psychoanalytic practice. New York: Grune & Stratton.

13.

Jourard, S. (1968). Disclosing man to himself. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

14.

Jourard, S. (1971). The transparent self (rev. ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

15.

Jacobs, L. (1978). I-thou relation in Gestalt therapy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, Los Angeles.

16.

Jung, C. (1966). The practise of psychotherapy: Essays on the psychology of the transference and other subjects (2nd ed., R.F.C. Hull, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.

17.

Malcolm, J. (1981). Psychoanalysis: The impossible profession. New York: Knopf.

18.

Searles, H. (1975). The patient as therapist to his analyst. In P. L. Giovacchini (Ed.), Tactics and techniques in psychoanalytic therapy, 2, Countertransference (pp. 95-151). New York: Jason Aronson.

19.

Sechehaye, M. (1951a). Reality lost and regained: Autobiography of a schizophrenic girl (G. Urbin-Rabson, Trans.). New York: Grune & Stratton.

20.

Sechehaye, M. (1951b). Symbolic realization: A new method of psychotherapy applied to a case of schizophrenia. New York: International Universities Press.

21.

Shainberg, D. (1977). Transforming transitions in patients and therapists. In K. A. Frank (Ed.), The human dimension in psychoanalytic practice (pp. 123-140). New York: Grune & Stratton.

22.

Singer, E. (1977). The fiction of analytic anonymity. In K. A. Frank (Ed.), The human dimension in psychoanalytic practice (pp. 181-192). New York: Grune & Stratton.

23.

Spiegelman, J. M. (1980). The image of the Jungian analyst and the problem of authority. Spring: 101-111.

24.

Spiegelman, J. M. (1965). Some implications of the transference. In Speculum psychologiae: Festschriftfuer C. A. Meier. Zurich: Raschon Verlag.

25.

Spiegelman, J. M. (1972). Transference, individuation, mutual process. Paper presented for the Jung Group of San Diego.

26.

Stanton, R. (1978). Dialogue in psychotherapy: Martin Buber, Maurice Friedman, and therapists of dialogue. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Union Graduate School-West.

27.

Sullivan, H. (1940). Conceptions of modern psychiatry. Psychiatry, 3, 1-117.

Healing Through Meeting and the Problematic of Mutuality

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References