As, A.A note on distractibility and hypnosis. Anmer. J. c/in. HIypn., 1962, 5, 135-137.
2.
BARBER, T. X.The effects of "hypnosis" on learning and recall: A methodological critique. J.clin. Psychol., 1965, 21, 19-25.
3.
BARBER, T. X. & CALVERLEY, D. S.Toward a theory of "hypnotic" behavior. Arch. gen. Psychiat., 1964, 10, 209-216.
4.
BARRON, F.Creativity and nental health. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1963.
5.
BEN-AvI, A. Zen Buddhism. In S. Arieti (Ed.), American handbook of Psychiatry (Vol. 2). New York: Basic Books, 1959.
6.
BERLIN, L. M. et al. Studies in human cerebral function: The effects of mescaline and lysergic acid on cerebral process pertinent to creative activity. J.nerv. & ment. Dis., 1955, 122, 487-491.
7.
BOWERS, M. K.Experimental study of the creative process by means of hypnoanalytic associations to a painting done in occupational therapy: The magic ring of Walter Positive. Int. J. clin. & exp. Hypn., 1966, 14, 1-21.
8.
BOWERS, P. G.Personal communication, September 22, 1966.
9.
BOWERS, P. G. The effect of hypnosis and suggestions of reduced defensiveness on creativity test performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Wisconsin, 1965.
10.
COHEN, S.The beyond within. New York: Atheneum, 1964.
11.
COOPER, L. F. & ERICKSON, M. H.Time distortion in hypnosis. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1954.
12.
FADIMAN, J. et al. Use of psychedelic agents to facilitate creative problem solving. San Francisco: Instit. for Psychedelic Research, San Francisco State College, 1965.
13.
FREUD, S.The interpretation of dreams. In A. A. Brill (Ed.), The basic writings of Sigmund Freud. New York: Modern Library, 1938.
14.
HARMAN, W. W. et al. Psychedelic agents in creative problem-solving: A pilot study. Psychol. Rep., 1966, Monograph Supplement 2-V 19.
IZUMI, K. LSD and architectural design. In B. S. Aaronson and H. Osmond (Eds.), Psychedelics: Their uses and implications. New York: Doubleday, in preparation.
18.
JANINGER, O.Personal communication, May 16, 1967.
19.
LEVINE, J., LUDWIG, A. M. & LYLE, W. H.The controlled psychedelic state. Amer. J. clin. Hypn., 1963, 6, 1963-1964.
20.
LONDON, P.Hypnosis in children: An experimental approach. Int. J. clin. & exp. Hypn., 1962, 10, 79-91.
21.
LSD: A design tool? Progressive Arch., August, 1966, 147-153.
22.
MCCORD, HALLECK & SHERRILL, C. I.A note on increased ability to do calculus post-hypnotically. Amer. J. clin. Hypn., 1961, 4, 20-20.
23.
MCGLOTHLIN, W. H. et al. Long-lasting effects of LSD on normals. Los Angeles: Instit. of Government & Public Affairs, 1967.
24.
McGLOTHLIN, W. H. et al. Short-term effects of LSD on anxiety, attitudes and performance, J. Nerv. & ment. Dis., 1964, 139, 266-273.
25.
MASTERS, R. E. L.Personal communication, August 3, 1966.
26.
MASTERS, R. E. L. & HOUSTON, J. (Eds.). Psychedelic art. New York: Grove Press, 1968.
27.
MURTRPHY, G.Iluman potentialities. New York: Basic Books, 1958.
28.
POINCARE, H.Mathematical creation. In B. Ghiselin (Ed.), The creative process. New York: New American Library, 1955.
29.
RAGINSKY, B. B.Creativity in hypnosis. Psychosormatics, 1963, 4, 170-172.
30.
TINNIN, L.Cognitive activity without awareness. Amer. J. clin. Hypn., 1963, 9, 293-294.
31.
TORRANCE, E. P.Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1962.
32.
UHR, L.Learning under hypnosis: What do we know? What should we know?J.clin. & exp. Hypn., 1958, 6, 121-135.
33.
VINACKE, W. E.The psychology of thinking. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1952.
34.
WOLLMAN, L.Influence of hypnosis on the learning process. J. Amer. Soc. psychosom. Dent. & Med., 1965, 12, 75-79.
35.
ZEGANS, L. S., POLLARD, J. C. & BROWN, D.The effects of LSD-25 on creativity and tolerance to regression. Arch. gen. Psychiat., 1967, 16, 740-749.