This article advances the view that cognition is to be found not in the world of abstract mental content but in the intricate interplay between an embodied mind and its world. Accordingly, the guiding theme of this article is that having a mind is about achieving a kind of optimal attunement or grip with the world of perception through embodied means. The article thus begins by situating the concept of grip within its proper philosophical context—the phenomenological tradition—with a special emphasis on the contributions of Husserl and Merleau-Ponty. It then surveys contemporary theoretical and empirical developments within the cognitive and human sciences that extend and further refine the concept of optimal gripping, including enactivist, ecological, and humanistic frameworks. It concludes by reviewing emerging research on the relationship between personality traits and styles of grip in the context of applied personality assessment, demonstrating the significance of optimal gripping—and therefore of phenomenology and embodiment—for psychological theory and praxis.
Arellano-VélizN. A.CastilloR. D.JeronimusB. F.KunnenE. S.CoxR. F. A. (2025). Beyond words: Speech coordination linked to personality and appraisals. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 49(1), 85–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-025-00482-3
2.
Arellano-VélizN. A.CoxR. F.JeronimusB. F.CastilloR. D.KunnenE. S. (2024). Personality expression in body motion dynamics: An enactive, embodied, and complex systems perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 110, Article 104495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104495
3.
BerkeleyG. (1998). Three dialogues between Hylas and Philonous (DancyJ., Ed.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1713)
4.
BruinebergJ.RietveldE. (2014). Self-organization, free energy minimization, and optimal grip on a field of affordances. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 599. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00599
5.
ByrneT. (2021). Husserl’s theory of signitive and empty intentions in Logical Investigations and its revisions: Meaning intentions and perceptions. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 52(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2020.1848845
Di PaoloE. A.BarandiaranX. E.BeatonM.BuhrmannT. (2014). Learning to perceive in the sensorimotor approach: Piaget’s theory of equilibration interpreted dynamically. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 551. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00551
10.
DreyfusH. L. (2016). Skillful coping: Essays on the phenomenology of everyday perception and action (WrathallM. A., Ed.). Oxford University Press.
11.
FancherR. E.RutherfordA. (2017). Pioneers of psychology: A history (5th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
12.
FristonK. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787
13.
GalileoG. (2008). The assayer (FinocchiaroM. A., Ed. & Trans.). In FinocchiaroM. A. (Ed.), The essential Galileo (pp. 179–189). Hackett. (Original work published 1623)
14.
GallagherS. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press.
15.
GibsonJ. J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
16.
GiorgiA. (1976). Phenomenology and the foundations of psychology. In ArnoldW. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 281–348). University of Nebraska Press.
17.
GiorgiA. (2014). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach (5th ed.). Duquesne University Press. (Original work published 2009)
18.
HeideggerM. (1962). Being and time (MacquarrieJ.RobinsonE., Trans.). Harper & Row. (Original work published 1927)
HovhannisyanG. (2022). Specifying the conditions for a theory of teleology in cognitive science. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 42(3), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000184
21.
HovhannisyanG. (2023). A demonstration of enactivist personality assessment using the five-factor model [Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University, Duquesne University Digital Commons]. Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/2199
22.
HovhannisyanG. (2025). The five-factor personality assessment system. The Humanistic Psychologist, 53(3), 341–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000366
23.
HovhannisyanG.GoicoecheaJ. (2024). Individualizing psychological assessment using the five-factor model: A phenomenological, enactivist approach. The Humanistic Psychologist, 52(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000310
HumeD. (2007). An enquiry concerning human understanding (MillicanP., Ed.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1748)
28.
HusserlE. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (CarrD., Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
29.
HusserlE. (1970). The Vienna lecture (CarrD., Trans.). In HusserlE. (Ed.), The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (Appendix I, pp. 269–299). Northwestern University Press. (Original lecture delivered 1935)
30.
HusserlE. (1977). Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology (CairnsD., Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. (Original work published 1931)
JaegerJ.RiedlA.DjedovicA.VervaekeJ.WalshD. (2024). Naturalizing relevance realization: Why agency and cognition are fundamentally not computational. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1362658. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1362658
33.
JuarreroA. (1999). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. MIT Press.
34.
KiversteinJ.MillerM.RietveldE. (2019). The feeling of grip: Novelty, error dynamics, and the predictive brain. Synthese, 196(7), 2847–2869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1583-9
35.
Merleau-PontyM. (1964). The primacy of perception: And other essays on phenomenological psychology, the philosophy of art, history and politics (EdieJ. M., Ed. & Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
36.
Merleau-PontyM. (1968). The visible and the invisible (LefortC., Ed., LingisA., Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
37.
Merleau-PontyM. (2004). The world of perception (DavisO., Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1948)
38.
Merleau-PontyM. (2014). Phenomenology of perception (LandesD. A., Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1945)
39.
MillerM.WhiteB.ScrivnerC. (2023). Surfing uncertainty with screams: Predictive processing, error dynamics and horror films. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 379(1895), Article 20220425. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0425
RobbinsB. D. (2013). Enactive cognition and the neurophenomenology of emotion. In GordonS. (Ed.), Neurophenomenology and its application to psychology (pp. 1–24). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7239-1_1
46.
RobbinsB. D. (2024). Getting a grip on normativity: A phenomenological response to Maslow’s call for a “humanistic biology.”Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 64(1), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678221147957
47.
RobbinsB. D.GordonS. (2015). Humanistic neuropsychology: The implications of neurophenomenology for psychology. In SchneiderK.PiersonJ.BugentalJ. (Eds.), The handbook of humanistic psychology: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 196–212). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483387864.n15
48.
SmithJ. A.OsbornM.SmithJ. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In SmithJ. A. (Ed.). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). Sage Publications.
49.
ThompsonE. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Belknap of Harvard University Press.
50.
ThompsonE. (2011). Précis of mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(5–6), 10–22.
51.
van ManenM. (2017). But is it phenomenology?Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 775–779.
52.
VarelaF.ThompsonE.RoschE. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.
53.
VervaekeJ.MastropietroC. (2024). Awakening from the meaning crisis: Part one: Origins (CoyneS., Ed.). Story Grid Publishing.
54.
ZahaviD. (2008). Husserl’s phenomenology. Stanford University Press.
