The Role of Synchronicity in Meaning Reconstruction: Integrating Synchronicity,Meaning Reconstruction,Terror Management,and Shattered Assumptions Theory in Bereavement
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
The Role of Synchronicity in Meaning Reconstruction: Integrating Synchronicity,Meaning Reconstruction,Terror Management,and Shattered Assumptions Theory in Bereavement
Bereavement and grief are psychological states that often lead those affected to question the meaning of life. Although early theories of grief emphasized emotional regulation and detachment from the deceased, modern research looks at the cognitive processes involved in reconstructing meaning. This article examines how synchronicity can help individuals reconstruct meaning during bereavement. This study examined synchronicity in bereavement using a qualitative, phenomenological method. Seven bereaved women residing in the United States in 2010, aged 26 to 61, were selected. Participants provided written accounts along with semi-structured interviews. A phenomenological method was employed for data analysis. Results indicated five essential components to the experience that facilitate the reconstruction of meaning during active grieving. These findings contribute to the understanding of meaning-making in grief and have implications for grief counseling practice.
BeckerE. (2024). The denial of death, 50th Anniversary Edition. Simon & Schuster. (Original work published 1974).
3.
BowlbyJ. (1963). Pathological mourning and childhood mourning. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 11(3), 500–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/000306516301100303
4.
BraudW. G.IrvingW. (2001). Experiencing tears of wonder-joy: Seeing with the heart’s eye. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 33(2), 99–111.
5.
ColaizziP. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In ValleR.KingM. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press.
FreudS. (1917). Mourning and melancholia. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIV (1914–1916): On the history of the psycho-analytic movement, papers on metapsychology and other works pp. 237–258. Hogarth.
8.
GiorgiA. (1970). Psychology as a human science: A phenomenologically based approach. Harper.
9.
GiorgiA. (1986). Theoretical justification for the use of descriptions in psychological research. In AshworthP.GiorgiA.deKoningA. (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology (pp. 3–22). Duquesne University Press.
10.
GiorgiA. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press.
11.
HeinS. F.AustinW. J. (2001). Empirical and hermeneutic approaches to phenomenological research in psychology: A comparison. Psychological Methods, 6(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.6.1.3
12.
HillJ. (2011, July). Synchronicity & grief: The phenomenology of meaningful coincidence as it arises during bereavement. Paper presented at the 30th Annual International Human Science Research Conference: Intertwining Body-Self-World, Oxford, UK.
13.
HillJ. (2014, January). Embodied writing as a data collection technique in phenomenology. Paper presented at The Qualitative Report 5th Annual Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
14.
HycnerR. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 8, 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00142995
15.
Janoff-BulmanR. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. Free Press.
16.
JungC. G. (2010). Synchronicity: An acausal connecting principle (HullR. F. C., Trans.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1952)
17.
KlassD.SilvermanP. R.NickmanS. L. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief. Taylor & Francis.
18.
NelsonK.LukawieckiJ.WaitschiesK.JacksonE.ZivotC. (2022). Exploring the impacts of an art and narrative therapy program on participants’ grief and bereavement experiences. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying, 90(2), 726–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228221111726
19.
NiemeyerR.CacciatoreJ. (2018). Toward a developmental theory of grief. In NiemeyerR. (Ed.), Techniques of grief therapy (pp. 3–13). Routledge.
20.
O’ConnorM. (2024). Grief universalism: A perennial problem pattern returning in digital grief studies?Social Sciences, 13, 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13040208
21.
PolkinghorneD. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In ValleR.HallingS. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology: Exploring the breadth of human experience (pp. 41–60). Plenum Press.
SolomonS.GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT. (2015). The worm at the core: On the role of death in life. Random House.
24.
StroebeM.SchutH. (1999). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: Rationale and description. Death Studies, 23(3), 197–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/074811899201046
25.
ThimmJ. C.HollandJ. M. (2017). Early maladaptive schemas, meaning making, and complicated grief symptoms after bereavement. International Journal of Stress Management, 24(4), 347. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000042
26.
ValleR. S.KingM.HallingS. (1989). An introduction to existential-phenomenological thought in psychology. In ValleR. S.HallingS. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6989-3_1
27.
WordenJ. W. (2018). Grief counseling and grief therapy: A handbook for the mental health practitioner (4th ed.). Springer.
