In contrast to Freud’s conviction that dreams are a disguise of unconscious forbidden desires, this dream-centered methodology shows that dreams are intrinsically honest and have “self-discernable” meaning that can only be grasped by the dreamer. The article describes simple techniques to help clients center on their dream experience and self-realize the truths embodied in the rich, wondrous, and mysterious (but not “disguised”) images in their dreams. By using Dora’s own words and applying historical/biographical details of her life, the method allows her dream images to finally speak their truths—and overcome the tyranny of Freud’s relentless, over-sexualized interpretations. By repeatedly overruling Dora’s own ideas with his authority, Freud caused Dora to distrust her own understanding of her dream images along with her other feelings and perceptions about herself and the outrageous conduct of the adults in her life. By helping to facilitate the self-discernible meaning of dream images, therapists honor the autonomy of clients like Dora and foster their self-affirming capacity to draw wisdom and enrichment from their dreams.
AkaviaN. (2005). Hysteria, identification, and the family: A rereading of Freud’s Dora case. American Imago, 62(2), 193–216.
2.
BalsamR. (2015). Eyes, ears, lips, fingertips, secrets: Dora, psychoanalysis, and the body. Psychoanalytic Review, 102(1), 33–58.
3.
BanksC. (1991). A dream of the incest taboo, exchange of women, and seduction: A reinterpretation of Freud’s Dora. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 14(2), 251–269.
BossM. (1958). The analysis of dreams. Philosophical Library.
6.
ColomboD. (2010). “Worthless female material”: Nursemaids and governesses in Freud’s cases. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 58(5), 835–859.
7.
ConradiP. (2000). Dreams, the unconscious and the person-centred approach: Revisioning practice. In MerryT. (Ed.), Person-centred practice: The BAPCA reader (pp. 218–231). PCCS Books.
8.
DeckerH. (1992). Freud, Dora and Vienna 1900. Simon & Shuster.
9.
EllisA.RaitmayrO.HerbstC. (2015). The Ks: The other couple in the case of Freud’s “Dora.”Journal of Austrian Studies, 48(4), 1–26.
10.
FinkeJ. (1990). Dream work in client-centered psychotherapy. In LietaerG.RombautsJ.Van BalenR. (Eds.), Client-centered and experiential psychotherapy in the nineties (pp. 503–510). Leuven University Press.
11.
FinziD.WesterinkH. (Eds.). (2018). Dora, hysteria, and gender: Reconsidering Freud’s case study. Leuven University Press.
12.
FreudS. (1977). The origins of psychoanalysis. Letters to Wilhelm Fliess. Basic Books.
13.
FreudS. (2001). The interpretation of dreams (SE 4). (Original work published 1900). Hogarth Press.
14.
FreudS. (2001). Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria (SE 7). (Original work published 1905). Hogarth Press.
15.
GlennJ. (1986). Freud, Dora and the maid: A study of countertransference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 34(3), 591–606.
16.
GoncharJ. (1993). Comments on “A dream of the incest taboo, exchange of women, and seduction: A reinterpretation of Freud’s Dora” by C. Banks. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 62(3), 508–509.
17.
HallC. (1966). The meaning of dreams. McGraw-Hill.
18.
JenningsJ. (1986a). The dream is the dream is the dream: A person-centered approach to dream analysis. Person-Centered Review, 1(3), 310–333.
19.
JenningsJ. (1986b). Husserl revisited: The forgotten distinction between psychology and phenomenology. American Psychologist, 41(11), 1231–1240.
20.
JenningsJ. (1986c). The revival of “Dora”: Advances in psychoanalytic theory and technique. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 34(3), 607–635.
21.
JenningsJ. (1995). Dream-centered dream study: The pursuit of prolucidity. Journal of Mental Imagery, 19(1–2), 43–66.
22.
JenningsJ. (2007). Dreams without disguise: The self-evident nature of dreams. The Humanistic Psychologist, 35(3), 1–22.
23.
JenningsJ. (2022). Freud’s case of Dora: Wellspring of discovery and discourse. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 290–314.
24.
KarleW.CorriereR.HartJ.WoldenbergL. (1980). The functional analysis of dreams: A new theory of dreaming. The Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36(1), 5–78.
25.
KochA. (2009). Dreams: Bringing us two steps closer to the client’s perspective. Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies, 8(4), 333–348.
26.
LacanJ. (1982). Intervention on transference. In MitchellJ.RoseJ. (Eds.), Feminine sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the Ecole Freudienne (pp. 61–73). W.W. Norton. (Original work published 1952)
27.
LearyD. (1990). Psyche’s muse: The role of metaphor. In LearyD. (Ed.), Metaphors in the history of psychology (pp. 1–78). Cambridge University Press.
MahonyP. (1996). Freud’s Dora: A psychoanalytic, historical, and textual study. Yale University Press.
30.
MargolinL. (2017). Freud, Dora, and compulsory sexuality. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 61(4), 546–560.
31.
MargolinL. (2021). The etherized wife: Power and privilege in sex therapy discourse. Oxford University Press.
32.
McCaffreyP. (1984). Freud and Dora: The artful dream. Rutgers University Press.
33.
MontenegroM. (2015). A comparison of Freudian and Bossian approaches to dreams. Existential Analysis: Journal of the Society for Existential Analysis, 26(2), 313–327.
34.
MontenegroM. (2018). Dora’s dreams revised: An existential-phenomenological analysis. Existential Analysis: Journal of the Society for Existential Analysis, 29(2), 231–243.
35.
PossickS. (1984). Termination in the Dora case. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 12, 1–11.
RobinsC. (1991). Dora’s dreams: In whose voice—Strachey’s, Freud’s, or Dora’s?Contemporary Psychotherapy Review, 6(1), 44–79.
39.
RogersC. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications and theory. Constable.
40.
RogersC. (1980). A way of being. Houghton Mifflin.
41.
TannerT. (2005). Sigmund Freud und die Zeitschrift für Hypnotismus. Zeitschrift zur Geschichte der Psychoanalyse, 18(36), 65–118.
42.
Van den BergS. (1986). Reading Dora reading: Freud’s “fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria.”Literature and Psychology, 32, 27–35.
43.
Van den BergS. (1987). Reading and writing Dora: Preoedipal conflict in Freud’s “fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria.”Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought, 10(1), 45–67.
44.
VossenT. (1990). Client-centered dream therapy. In LietaerG.RombautsJ.Van BalenR. (Eds.), Client-centered and experiential psychotherapy in the nineties (pp. 511–548). Leuven University Press.
