The study of ways of knowing is a major topic in psychology and cognitive science. However, one might argue that subjectivity and human experience as roots of knowing are seldom addressed, despite the perspectives that they may offer. Our work investigates the epistemic status of experience and the living body in knowledge processes. It asserts that human experience contains a myriad richness and argues that a first-person epistemology and precise methods are needed to genuinely conduct experiential research. The stakes of such a proposal are not only epistemological but also nourish an ethical and societal goal.
AbramD. (1996). The spell of the sensuous. Vintage Books.
2.
AbreuJ. M. (1999). Conscious and nonconscious African American stereotypes: Impact on first impression and diagnostic ratings by therapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology67(3), 387-393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.67.3.387
AntoineP.SmithJ. A. (2017). Saisir l’expérience: présentation de l’analyse phénoménologique interprétative comme méthodologie qualitative en psychologie [Grasp the experience: Presentation of interpretive phenomenological analysis as a qualitative methodology in psychology]. Psychologie française, 62(4), 373-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2016.04.001
5.
AtariaY.Dor-ZidermanY.Berkovich-OhanaA. (2015, September). How does it feel to lack a sense of boundaries? A case study of a long-term mindfulness meditator. Consciousness and Cognition, 37, 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.09.002
6.
AustinJ. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.
7.
AustryD.BergerE. (2011). Empathie, toucher et corps sensible: pour une philosophie pratique du contact [Empathy, touch and the sensitive body: For a practical philosophy of contact]. In BotbolM.Garret-GloanecN.BesseA. (Eds.), L’empathie au carrefour des sciences et de la clinique. Colloque de Cerisy [Empathy at the crossroads of science and clinic. Cerisy conference] (pp. 229-246). Doin.
BergerE.VermerschP. (2006). Réduction phénoménologique et épochè corporelle: Psycho-phénoménologie de la pratique du “point d’appui.” [Phenomenological reduction and bodily epochè: Psycho-phenomenology of the practice of the “fulcrum.”] Expliciter, 67, 45-50.
11.
BitbolM.PetitmenginM. (2011). On pure reflection: A reply to Zahavi. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(2), 24-37.
12.
BranscombeN. R.SmithE. R. (1990). Gender and racial stereotypes in impression formation and social decision-making processes. Sex Roles, 22(9/10), 627-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288239
13.
BurloudA. (1927). La pensée conceptuelle [Conceptual thinking]. Alcan.
14.
ChurchillS. D.WertzF. J. (2015). An introduction to phenomenological research in psychology: Historical, conceptual, and methodological foundations. In SchneiderK. J.PiersonJ. F.BugentalJ. F. T. (Eds.), The handbook of humanistic psychology: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 275-295). Sage.
15.
CoupéC.Ollagnier-BeldameM. (2019). Epoché, verbal descriptions and corpus size in the conduct and analysis of explicitation interviews. Constructivist Foundations, 14(2), 158-160.
16.
DamasioA. R. (1999). Le sentiment même de soi [The very feeling of self]. Odile Jacob.
17.
DenisJ. (2016). Evaluation of therapeutic processes in clinical crisis intervention: Experts’ lived experiences of therapeutic action [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Mons, Belgium.
DeprazN. (Ed.). (2014). Première, deuxième, troisième personne [First, second, third person]. Zeta Books.
20.
DeprazN.GyemantM.DesmidtT. (2017). A first-person analysis using third-person data as a generative method: A case study of surprise in depression. Constructivist Foundations, 12(2), 190-203.
DukesK.MaddoxK. B. (2008). Social categorization and beyond: How facial features impact social judgment. In AmbadyN.SkowronskiJ. J. (Eds.), First impressions (pp. 205-233). Guilford Press.
23.
EvansK. R.KleineR. E.LandryT. D.CrosbyL. A. (2000). How first impressions of a customer impact effectiveness in an initial sales encounter. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(4), 512-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300284004
24.
FisherA. (2013). Radical Ecopsychology. State University of New-York Press.
25.
GendlinE. T. (1978). Focusing (1st ed.). Everest House.
26.
GendlinE. T. (1992). The primacy of the body, not the primacy of perception: How the body knows the situation and philosophy. Man and world, 25(3/4), 341-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01252424
27.
GendlinE. T. (1997). Experiencing and the creation of meaning. Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1962)
28.
GiorgiA. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press.
29.
GiorgiA. (2014). Phenomenological philosophy as the basis for a human scientific psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 42(3), 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873267.2014.933052
30.
GusdorfG. (1951). Mémoire et personne (2)[Memory and person]. PUF.
HendricksM. (2001). Focusing-oriented/experiential psychotherapy. In CainD. J. (Ed.), Humanistic psychotherapy: Handbook of research and practice (pp. 221-251). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10439-007
33.
HendricksM. (2009). Experiencing level: An instance of developing a variable from a first person process so it can be reliably measured and taught. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(10/12), 129-155.
34.
HenryM. (2008). Material phenomenology. Fordham University Press.
35.
HurlburtR. T.HeaveyC. L. (2006). Exploring inner experience: The descriptive experience sampling method. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.64
36.
HusserlE. (1996). Leçons pour une phénoménologie de la conscience intime du temps [Lessons for a phenomenology of the intimate time consciousness] (5th ed., DussortH., Trans.). Coll. « Épiméthée » [Coll. “Epimetheus”]. PUF.
KingsleyP. (1997). Knowing beyond knowing: The heart of Hermetic tradition. Parabola, XXII(1), 21-25.
39.
KordešU.DemšarE. (2018). Excavating belief about past experience: Experiential dynamics of the reflective act. Constructivist Foundations, 13(2), 219-229. http://constructivist.info/13/2/219
40.
LamboyB. (2003). Devenir qui je suis [Become who I am]. Desclée De Brouwer.
41.
LémonieY. (2009). Etude de l’interaction d’enseignement-apprentissage: Le cas de l’enseignement de la natation sportive en EPS [Study of the teaching-learning interaction: the case of teaching swimming in sports science] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Université Paris-Est.
42.
MadisonG. (2014). Theory and practice of focusing-oriented psychotherapy: Beyond the talking cure. Jessica Kingsley.
43.
McCarthyJ.WrightP. (2004). Technology as experience. MIT Press.
44.
Merleau-PontyM. (2005). La phénoménologie de la perception [The phenomenology of perception]. Gallim. (Original work published 1945)
45.
MouchetA. (2018). L’expérience subjective en recherche et en formation [The subjective experience in research and training]. Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231-259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
49.
Ollagnier-BeldameM.CazemajouA. (2019). Intersubjectivity in first encounters between healthcare practitioners and patients: Micro-phenomenology as a way to study lived experience. The Humanistic Psychologist, 47(4), 404-425. https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000133
50.
Ollagnier-BeldameM.CoupéC. (2019). Meeting you for the first time: Descriptive categories of an intersubjective experience. Constructivist Foundations, 14(2), 167-180.
PetitmenginC. (2006a). Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5(3), 229-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-006-9022-2
PetitmenginC. (2007). Towards the source of thoughts. The gestural and transmodal dimension of lived experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14(3), 54-82.
56.
PetitmenginC. (2010). La dynamique pré-réfléchie de l’expérience vécue [The pre-reflective dynamic of the lived experience]. Alter- Revue de Phénoménologie, 18, 165-182.
57.
PetitmenginC. (2020, May25-29). Anchoring in lived experience as an act of resistance. Communication to the workshop of the Lab of Microphenomenology.
58.
PetitmenginC.BitbolM. (2009). The validity of first-person descriptions as authenticity and coherence. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(10/12), 363-404.
59.
PetitmenginC.BitbolM.Ollagnier-BeldameM. (2015). Vers une science de l’expérience vécue [Toward a science of lived experience]. Intellectica, 64, 53-76. https://doi.org/10.3406/intel.2015.1012
60.
PetitmenginC.RemillieuxA.CahourB.Carter-ThomasS. (2013). A gap in Nisbett and Wilson’s findings? A first-person access to our cognitive processes. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(2), 654-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.02.004
61.
PetitmenginC.RemillieuxA.Valenzuela-MoguillanskyC. (2019). Discovering the structures of lived experience: Towards a micro-phenomenological analysis method. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18, 691-730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9597-4
62.
PiagetJ. (1974). La prise de conscience. PUF.
63.
PrestonL. (2014). À la frange de la conscience: Contribution de Gendlin à l’exploration de l’implicite [On the edge of consciousness: Gendlin’s contribution to exploring the implicit]. Cahiers de Gestalt-thérapie, 32(1), 40–65.
64.
RemillieuxA. (2010). Explicitation et modélisation des connaissances de conduite de changement à la SNCF: vers une gestion des connaissances pré-réfléchies [Explanation and modeling of change management knowledge at SNCF: Towards pre-thought knowledge management] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Evry, Institut national des télécommunications, & Troyes, Université de technologie.
65.
RogersC. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In KochS. (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (Vol. 3, pp. 184-256). McGraw Hill.
66.
SchillerD.FreemanJ. B.MitchellJ. P.UlemanJ. S.PhelpsE. A. (2009). A neural mechanism of first impressions. Nature Neuroscience, 12(4), 508-514. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2278
67.
SiegelD. J. (2010). Mindsight: The new science of personal transformation. Bantam Books.
68.
SternD. (1989). Le monde interpersonnel du nourrisson: une perspective psychanalytique et développementale [The interpersonal world of the infant: A psychoanalytic and developmental perspective]. PUF.
69.
SternD. (1997). Unformulated experience from dissociation to imagination in psychoanalysis. Analytic Press.
70.
SternD. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. W.W. Norton.
71.
Valenzuela-MoguillanskyC.Vásquez-RosatiA. (2019). An analysis procedure for the micro-phenomenological interview. Constructivist Foundations, 14(2), 123-145.
VermerschP. (2000a). Définition, nécessité, intérêt, limite du point de vue en première personne comme méthode de recherche [Definition, necessity, interest, limit of the first person point of view as a research method]. Expliciter, 35, 19-35.
76.
VermerschP. (2000b). Conscience directe et conscience réfléchie [Direct awareness and reflected awareness]. Intellectica, 31, 269-311. https://doi.org/10.3406/intel.2000.1609
77.
VermerschP. (2006). Vécus et couches des vécus. Expliciter, 66, 32–47.
78.
VermerschP. (2008). Décrire la pratique de l’introspection [Lives and layers of experiences]. Expliciter, 77, 33-59.
79.
VermerschP. (2012). Explicitation et phénoménologie [Explicitation and phenomenology]. Presses Universitaires de France.
80.
Vion-DuryJ.MouginG. (2018). L’exploration de l’expérience consciente: archéologie d’une démarche de recherche. Vers l’entretien phénoménologique expérientiel (EPE) Numéro Thématique: Fondamentaux de l’explicitation des vécus conscients [The exploration of conscious experience: archeology of a research process. Towards the phenomenological experiential interview (EPE) Theme number: Fundamentals of the explanation of conscious experiences]. Chroniques Phénoménologiques, 11, 43-57.
YeungV. W. L.KashimaY. (2010). Communicating stereotype-relevant information: How readily can people individuate?Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(4) 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01313.x
83.
ZahaviD. (2017). Husserl’s legacy: Phenomenology, metaphysics, and transcendental philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
