A cursory reading of most college mission statements can take one’s breath away in their lofty, humanistic sweep. The same is true for many course goals for Introductory Psychology. An analysis of 150 Introductory Psychology syllabi revealed that nearly 88% of courses attempt to achieve at least four of five humanistic outcomes. Students are expected to attain rich theoretical understanding, engage in critical and higher order thinking, change deep-seated attitudes, apply concepts to everyday life, and grow personally. At the end of the semester, however, many psychology instructors wonder about the extent to which these goals have actually been achieved and how much their students have learned, particularly when courses are structured around the “big textbook” and delivered in the traditional lecture format. This article presents a lively and accessible course outline for using Platonic dialogues and the ancient figure of Socrates to teach modern psychology. Socrates is among the world’s most engaging and effective teachers. He is also regarded as one of the founding figures of humanistic psychology who would have had serious problems with the didactic teaching methods and sterile textbooks of today’s college classrooms. The article shows how encountering Socrates and engaging Plato’s dialogues can help professors achieve many of the laudable humanistic goals they have for their students.
AdamsG. L.TallonR. J.RimellP. (1980). A comparison of lecture versus role-playing in the training of the use of positive reinforcement. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2, 205-212.
2.
AdlerM. (1972). How to read a book. New York, NY: Touchstone.
3.
AdlerM. (1997). Aristotle for everybody. New York, NY: Touchstone.
4.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
5.
ArumR.RoksaJ. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6.
AschM. J. (1951). Nondirective teaching in psychology: An experimental study. Psychological Monographs, 65(4, Serial No. 321), i-24.
7.
BabcockP.MarksM. (2011). The falling time cost of college: Evidence from half a century of time use data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 468-478.
8.
BainK. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
9.
BaneC. L. (1925). The lecture vs. the class-discussion method of college teaching. School & Society, 21, 300-302.
10.
BarnesJ. (2001). Aristotle: A very short introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
BarnettS. A. (1958). An experiment with free discussion groups. Universities Quarterly, 12, 175-180.
12.
BeanJ. C. (1996). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
BenjaminL. T. (2008). Favorite activities for the teaching of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
BentonS. L.KiewraK. A.WhitfillJ. M.DennisonR. (1993). Encoding and external storage effects on writing processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 267-280.
15.
BernsteinD. A.Gross-LucasS. (2004). Teaching psychology: A step-by-step guide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
BlighD. A. (2000). What’s the use of lectures?San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
BloomB. S. (1984). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
18.
BonwellC. G.EisonJ. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
19.
BranniganG. L. (1999). Experiencing psychology: Active learning adventures. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
20.
BridgesW. (1973). Thoughts on humanistic education, or, is “teaching” a dirty word?Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 13(1), 5-13.
21.
BrookfieldS. D. (1991). Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
BrookfieldS. D.PreskillS. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
BrunerJ. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21-32.
24.
DavidsonL. (1992). Philosophical foundations of humanistic psychology. In WertzF. J. (Ed.), The humanistic movement: Recovering the person in psychology (pp. 24-44). New York, NY: Gardner.
25.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier Books.
26.
DunnD.ChewS. (2006). Introductory Psychology without the big book. In DunnD.ChewS. (Eds.), Best practices for teaching introduction to psychology (pp. 83-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
EdgarC.PadgettR. (2007). Classics in the classroom: Using great literature to teach writing. New York, NY: Teachers and Writers Collaborative.
28.
ExleyK. (2004). Small group teaching: Tutorials, seminars and beyond. New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
FaircloughJ. (1995). History through role play. London, England: David Brown.
30.
FinkL. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
FinkelD. (2000). Teaching with your mouth shut. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
32.
GarrisonA. (2001). Restoring the human in humanistic psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41(4), 91-104.
33.
GraesserA. C.PersonN. K.HuX. (2002). Improving comprehension through discourse processing. In HalpernD.HakelM. D. (Eds.), Applying the science of learning to university teaching and beyond (pp. 33-44). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34.
GriggsR. A. (2009). Psychology: A concise introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
35.
GrigsbyM. (2009). College life through the eyes of students. Albany: State University of New York Press.
36.
GurungR. A.DanielD. (2006). Evidence-based pedagogy: Do text-based pedagogical features enhance student learning? In DunnD.ChewS. (Eds.), Best practices for teaching introduction to psychology (pp. 41-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
HansonV. D.HeathJ. (2001). Who killed Homer? The demise of classical education and the recovery of Greek wisdom. San Francisco, CA: Encounter Books.
38.
HortonS. R. (1982). Thinking through writing. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39.
JohnsonE.CartonJ. (2006). Introductory psychology without the big book. In DunnD. S.ChewS. L. (Eds.), Best practices for teaching introduction to psychology (pp. 83-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
KingL. (2009). Experience psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
41.
KingL. (2010). The science of psychology: An appreciative view (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
42.
KuhG. K. (2003). What we are learning about student engagement. Change, 35, 24-32.
43.
MarrouH. I. (1956). A history of education in antiquity (LambG., Trans.). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
44.
McKeachieW. J.SvinickiM. (2006). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
45.
MontessoriM. (1966). The secret of childhood (CostelloM. J., Trans.). New York, NY: Ballantine.
46.
MyersD. G. (2009). Psychology (9th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
47.
NanceJ. L.NanceC. E. (1990). Does learning occur in the classroom?College Student Journal, 24, 338-340.
48.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Number of degree-granting institutions and enrollment in these institutions, by size, type, and control of institution: Fall 2009. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/tables/dt10_244.asp
49.
PiagetJ. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
ProffittB. (2004). Plato within your grasp. New York, NY: Cliffs Notes.
51.
PurkeyW.AspyD. (2003). Overcoming tough challenges: An invitational theory of practice for humanistic psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43(3), 146-155.
52.
RederL. M.AndersonJ. R. (1982). Effects of spacing and embellishment on memory for the main points of a text. Memory & Cognition, 10, 97-102.
53.
RickardH. C.RogersR.EllisN. R.BeidlemanW. B. (1988). Some retention, but not enough. Teaching of Psychology, 15, 151-152.
54.
SchacterD. L.GilbertD. T.WegnerD. M. (2010). Psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
55.
SpiresH. A. (1993). Learning from a lecture: Effects of comprehension monitoring. Reading Research and Instruction, 32(2), 19-30.
56.
SternbergR. J. (1997). Teaching Introductory Psychology: Survival tips from the experts. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
57.
SternbergR. J.Spear-SwerlingL. (1996). Teaching for thinking. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
58.
StoddartR. M.McKinleyM. J. (2006). Using narratives, literature, and primary sources to teach Introductory Psychology: An interdisciplinary approach. In DunnD.ChewS. (Eds.), Best practices for teaching introduction to psychology (pp. 111-128). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59.
VanderStoepS. W.FagerlinA.FeenstraJ. S. (2000). What do students remember from Introductory Psychology?Teaching of Psychology, 27, 89-92.
60.
WeitenW. (2010). Psychology: Themes and variations (9th ed.). New York, NY: Wadsworth.
