Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

R. D. Laing's work on the origins of schizophrenia in family contexts has often been dismissed as unscientific because it failed to show any reliable correlation between disordered communication and schizoid breakdown. However, Laing's method is closer to that of sociological or historical investigation and is therefore largely independent of questions of natural-scientific etiology. His work must use two kinds of understanding: first, the actual understanding that allows him to render intelligible the words and behavior of the schizophrenic and, second, the explanatory or genetic understanding that allows him to appreciate madness as a possible (but not necessary or even prevalent) response to a particular social context. Both of these varieties of understanding are methodologically distinct from (and yet potentially complemented by) natural-scientific investigation and verification.

Keywords

R.D. Laing Verstehen schizophrenia hermeneutics understanding

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abel, T. (1953). The operation called Verstehen. In H. Feigl & M. Brodbeck (Eds.), Readings in the philosophy of science (pp. 677-687). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Apel, K.-O. (1967). Analytic philosophy of language and the Geisteswissenschaften (H. Holstelilie, Trans.). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: D. Reidel.

Bola, J.R. , & Mosher, L.R. (2005). The legacy of Kingsley Hall I: Treatment of acute psychosis without neuroleptics: Two-year outcomes from the Soteria Project . In S. Raschid (Ed.), R. D. Laing: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 249-272). London: Free Association.

Burston, D. (1996). The wing of madness: The life and work of R. D. Laing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Jaspers, K. (1963). General psychopathology (J. Hoenig & M. W. Hamilton, Trans.). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

Laing, R.D. (1965). The divided self: An existential study in sanity and madness. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, UK: Pelican. (Original work published 1960)

Laing, R.D. (1998). Wisdom, madness and folly: The making of a psychiatrist 1927-57. Edinburgh, UK: Canongate . (Original work published 1985)

Laing, R.D. , & Esterson, A. (1970). Sanity, madness and the family: Families of schizophrenics . London: Pelican. (Original work published 1964)

Leat, D. (1972). Misunderstanding Verstehen. Sociological Review, 20(1), 29-38.

10.

Mullan, B. (1995). Mad to be normal: Conversations with R. D. Laing . London: Free Association.

11.

Raschid, S. (2005). Editorial introduction. In S. Raschid (Ed.), R. D. Laing: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 15-35). London: Free Association.

12.

Rickert, H. (1962). Science and history: A critique of positivist epistemology (G. Reisman, Trans.). Princeton: Van Nostrand.

13.

Sartre, J.-P. (1969). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1943; English translation published 1958)

14.

Scriven, M. (1959). Truisms as the ground for historical explanations . In P. Gardiner (Ed.), Theories of history (pp. 443-475). London: George Allen and Unwin.

15.

Searle, J. (2001). Rationality in action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

16.

Winch, P. (1958). The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

17.

Zilsel, E. (1953). Physics and the problem of historico-sociological laws. In H. Feigl & M. Brodbeck (Eds.), Readings in the philosophy of science (pp. 714-722). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts .

Psychiatry as Hermeneutics: Laing's Argument With Natural Science

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References