In attempting to understand the dynamics of what distinguishes humans as a unique species, the author argues that humanistic psychology has limited itself to too narrow a definition of the human experience. From its beginning, it struggled with separation from the ideology of humanism and the question as to whether the transpersonal experience is a valid inquiry within its domain. Now it is time to tackle a different aspect of being fully human—our psychological relationship with our environment. This article attempts to explicate how the principles of humanistic psychology—self-actualization, awareness, responsibility, and authenticity—can address our environmental crisis through the concepts and practice of empathy, unconditional positive regard, and a wider identification beyond humankind to include the natural world. An ecological-humanistic psychology and worldview includes humans as part of the environment, not separate from it.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, E. P.
(Ed.). (1942). As William James said: Extracts from the published writings of William James. New York: Vanguard.
2.
Buber, M.
(1958). I and thou. New York: Scribner.
3.
Bugental, J.
(1964). The third force in psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 4(1), 19-26.
4.
Bugental, J.
(1965). The search for authenticity: An existential-analytic approach to psychotherapy. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
5.
Bugental, J.
(1976). The search for existential identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Carson, R.
(1962). Silent spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7.
Chaudhuri, H.
(1975). Psychology: Humanistic and transpersonal. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 15, (1), 7-15.
8.
Duhl, L.
(1986). Health and the inner and outer sky. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 26(3), 46-61.
9.
Ehrenfeld, D.
(1978). The arrogance of humanism. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Fox, W.
(1995). Toward a transpersonal ecology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
11.
Frankl, V.
(1966). Self-transcendence as a human phenomenon. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 6, 97-106.
12.
Howard, G.
(1997). Ecological psychology: Creating a more earth-friendly human nature. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
13.
Howard, G.
(2000). Adapting human lifestyles for the 21st century. American Psychologist, 55(5), 509-515.
14.
James, W.
(1997). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. New York: Simon & Schuster. (Original work published 1902)
15.
Jourard, S.
(1971). The transparent self (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand.
16.
Kuhn, J. (2000). Theoretical and empirical study of the dominant social and ecological paradigms: A survey of the California State legislature. Dissertation submitted for publication.
17.
Lasch, C.
(1979). The culture of narcissism. New York: Warner.
18.
Maslow, A.
(1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
19.
Maslow, A.
(1993). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Arkana. (Original work published 1971)
20.
May, R.
(1953). Man’s search for himself. New York: Norton.
21.
May, R.
(1985, January). The third humanism. AHP Perspective, p.5.
22.
May, R.
(1986). Transpersonal or transcendental?The Humanistic Psychologist, 14(2), 87-90.
23.
Metzner, R.
(1991). Psychologizing deep ecology: A review essay. ReVISION, 13(3), 147-152.
24.
Metzner, R.
(1998). The unfolding self: Varieties of transformative experience. Novato, CA: Origin.
25.
Metzner, R.
(1999). Green psychology: Transforming our relationship to the Earth. Rochester, VT: Park Street Press.
26.
Mindell, A.
(1996). Discovering the world in the individual: The world channel in psychotherapy. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 36(3), 67-84.
27.
Moustakas, C.
(1985). Humanistic or humanism?Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 25(3), 5-11.
28.
Naess, A.
(1986). Self-realization: An ecological approach to being in the world. In G. Session (Ed.), Deep ecology for the 21st century (pp.225-239). Boston: Shambhala.
29.
Naess, A.
(1989). Ecology, community, and life-style: Outline of an ecosophy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Oskamp, S.
(2000). A sustainable future for humanity? How can psychology help?American Psychologist, 55(5), 496-508.
31.
Rogers, C.
(1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
32.
Rogers, C.
, & Sanford, R. (1985). Client-centered psychotherapy. In H. Kaplan & B. Sadock (Eds.), Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (4th ed., pp. 1374-1388). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
33.
Roszak, T.
(1992). The voice of the Earth: An exploration of ecopsychology. New York: Simon & Schuster.
34.
Roszak, T.
, Gomes, M., & Kanner, A. (Eds.). (1995). Ecopsychology: Restoring the Earth, healing the mind. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
35.
Shapiro, K.
(1990). Animal rights versus humanism: The charge of speciesism. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 30(2), 9-38.
36.
Shepard, P.
(1995). Nature and madness. In T. Roszak, M. Gomes, & A. Kanner (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Restoring the Earth, healing the mind.San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
37.
Thoreau, H. D.
(1985). Walden; or, life in the woods. In R. Sayre (Ed.), Thoreau. New York: Library of America.
38.
Wilber, K.
(1998). The marriage of sense and soul: Integrating science and religion. New York: Random House.
39.
Winter, D.
(1996). Ecological psychology: Healing the split between planet and self. New York: HarperCollins.
40.
Winter, D.
(2000). Some big ideas for some big problems. American Psychologist, 55(5), 516-522.
41.
Wolfe, L.
(Ed.). (1938). John of the mountains: The unpublished journals of John Muir. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
42.
Wu, Y.
(1989). The book of Lao Tzu (the Tao Te Ching). San Francisco: Great Learning.
