According to the cumulative advantage hypothesis, health gaps between socioeconomic groups widen with age. In the United States, studies have supported this hypothesis. Outside this context, evidence remains scarce. The present study tests the cumulative advantage hypothesis in Sweden, a society that contrasts sharply with the United States in terms of policies designed to reduce social disparities in health-related resources. I draw on longitudinal data from the Swedish Level of Living Survey (N = 9,412 person-years), spanning the period between 1991 and 2010. The results show that gaps in self-rated health increase from early to middle adulthood. This applies to differences between educational groups and between occupational classes. In older age, health gaps remain constant. Cross-cohort analyses reveal a rising importance of cumulative advantage between educational groups but not between occupational classes. I conclude that the forces of accumulation prevail even in one of the most egalitarian welfare states.
AbergRune. 2003. “Unemployment Persistency, Over-education and the Employment Chances of the Less Educated.” European Sociological Review19(2):199–216.
2.
AiChunrongNortonEdward C.2003. “Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models.” Economic Letters80:123–29.
3.
AisenbreySilkeEvertssonMarieGrunowDaniela. 2009. “Is There a Career Penalty for Mothers’ Time Out? A Comparison of Germany, Sweden and the United States.” Social Forces88(2):573–605.
4.
BambraClareBeckfieldJason. 2012. “Institutional Arrangements as Candidate Explanations for the US Mortality Disadvantage.” Background report prepared for the National Academy of Sciences/Institute of Medicine Panel on International Differences in Mortality.
5.
BarkerDavid. 1998. Mothers, Babies, and Health in Later Life. London: Churchill Livingstone.
6.
BeckettMegan. 2000. “Converging Health Inequalities in Later Life: An Artifact of Mortality Selection?”Journal of Health and Social Behavior41(1):106–19.
7.
Ben-ShlomoYoavKuhDiana. 2002. “A Life Course Approach to Chronic Disease Epidemiology.” International Journal of Epidemiology31(2):285–93.
8.
BerryWilliam D.DeMerittJacqueline H. R.EsareyJustin. 2010. “Testing for Interaction in Binary Logit and Probit Models: Is a Product Term Essential?”American Journal of Political Science54(1):248–66.
9.
BradleyRobert H.CorwynRobert F.2002. “Socioeconomic Status and Child Development.” Annual Review of Psychology53:371–99.
10.
CaseAnneLubotskyDarrenPaxsonChristina. 2002. “Economic Status and Health in Childhood: The Origins of the Gradient.” American Economic Review92(5):1308–34.
11.
ChenFeinianYangYangLiuGuangya. 2010. “Social Change and Socioeconomic Disparities in Health over the Life Course in China: A Cohort Analysis.” American Sociological Review75(1):126–50.
12.
DanneferDale. 1987. “Aging as Intracohort Differentiation: Accentuation, the Matthew Effect, and the Life Course.” Sociological Forum2(2):211–37.
13.
DiPreteThomas A.2002. “Life Course Risks, Mobility Regimes, and Mobility Consequences: A Comparison of Sweden, Germany, and the United States.” American Journal of Sociology108(2):267–309.
14.
DiPreteThomas A.EirichGregory M.2006. “Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments.” Annual Review of Sociology32:271–97.
15.
EikemoTerje A.HuismanMarijnBambraClareKunstAnton E.2008. “Health Inequalities According to Educational Level in Different Welfare Regimes: A Comparison of 23 European Countries”Sociology of Health & Illness30(4):565–82.
16.
ElderGlen H.1998. “The Life Course as Developmental Theory.” Child Development69(1):1–12.
17.
EriksonRobert. 2014. “LNU från utredning till forskning” [LNU from investigation to research]. Pp. 30–45 in Ojämlikhetens dimensioner: uppväxtvillkor, arbete och hälsa i Sverige [Dimensions of inequality: Childhood conditions, work and health in Sweden], edited by EvertssonM.MagnussonC.Stockholm: Liber.
18.
Esping-AndersenGösta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
19.
EvansGary W.KimPilyoung. 2010. “Multiple Risk Exposure as a Potential Explanatory Mechanism for the Socioeconomic Status–Health Gradient”Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1186:174–89.
20.
GreeneWilliam. 2010. “Testing Hypotheses about Interaction Terms in Nonlinear Models.” Economics Letters107(2):291–96.
21.
FerraroKenneth F.Kelley-MooreJessica A.2003. “Cumulative Disadvantage and Health: Long-term Consequences of Obesity.” American Sociological Review68(5):707–29.
22.
FreemanRichard B.SwedenborgBirgittaTopelRobert H.2010. Reforming the Welfare State: Recovery and Beyond in Sweden. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
GoeslingBrian. 2007. “The Rising Significance of Education for Health?”Social Forces85(4):1621–44.
24.
HärkönenJuhoBihagenErik. 2011. “Occupational Attainment and Career Progression in Sweden.” European Societies13(3):451–79.
25.
HouseJames S.LepkowskiJames M.KinneyAnn M.MeroRichard P.KesslerRonald C.HerzogA. Regula. 1994. “The Social Stratification of Aging and Health.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior35(3):213–34.
26.
IdlerEllen L.BenyaminiYael. 1997. “Self-rated Health and Mortality: A Review of Twenty-seven Community Studies.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior38(1):21–37.
KerckhoffAlan C.1995. “Institutional Arrangements and Stratification Processes in Industrial Societies.” Annual Review of Sociology21: 323–47.
29.
KimJinyoungDurdenEmily. 2007. “Socioeconomic Status and Age Trajectories of Health.” Social Science & Medicine65:2489–2502.
30.
KjellssonSara. 2013. “Accumulated Occupational Class and Self-rated Health: Can Information on Previous Experience of Class Further Our Understanding of the Social Gradient in Health?”Social Science & Medicine81:26–33.
31.
KondoNaokiRostilaMikaelYngweMonica Åberg. 2014. “Rising Inequality in Mortality Among Working-age Men and Women in Sweden: A National Registry-based Repeated Cohort Study, 1990–2007.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. doi:10.1136/jech-2013-203619.
32.
KorpiTomas. 2001. “Accumulating Disadvantage: Longi-tudinal Analyses of Unemployment and Physical Health in Representative Samples of the Swedish Population.” European Sociological Review17(3):255–73.
33.
LauderdaleDiane S.2001. “Education and Survival: Birth Cohort, Period, and Age Effects.” Demography38(4):551–61.
34.
LiangKung-YeeZegerScott L.1986. “Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Generalized Linear Models.” Biometrika73(1):13–22.
35.
LundbergOlleDiderichsenFinnÅberg YngweMonica. 2001. “Changing Health Inequalities in a Changing Society? Sweden in the Mid-1980s and Mid-1990s.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health29(suppl.55):31–39.
36.
LundbergOlleManderbackaKristiina. 1996. “Assessing Reliability of a Measure of Self-rated Health.” Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine24(3):218–24.
37.
LynchScott M.2003. “Cohort and Life-course Patterns in the Relationship between Education and Health: A Hierarchical Approach.” Demography40(2):309–31.
38.
LynchScott M.2006. “Explaining Life Course and Cohort Variation in the Relationship between Education and Health: The Role of Income.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior47(4):324–38.
39.
MackenbachJohan P.2012. “The Persistence of Health Inequalities in Modern Welfare States: The Explanation of a Paradox.” Social Science & Medicine75:761–69.
40.
MackenbachJohan P.StirbuIrinaRoskamAlbert-Jan R.SchaapMaartje M.MenvielleGwennLeinsaluMallKunstAnton E.2008. “Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health in 22 European Countries.” New England Journal of Medicine358(23):2468–81.
41.
MayerKarl U.2005. “Life Course and Life Chances in a Comparative Perspective.” Pp. 17–55 in Analyzing Inequality: Life Chances and Social Mobility in Comparative Perspective, edited by SvallforsS.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
42.
McLeodChristopher B.HallPeter A.SiddiqiArjumandHertzmanClyde. 2012. “How Society Shapes the Health Gradient: Work-related Health Inequalities in a Comparative Perspective.” Annual Review of Public Health33:59–73.
43.
MertonRobert K.1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Science159(3810):56–63.
44.
MirowskyJohnRossCatherine E.2007. “Life Course Trajectories of Perceived Control and Their Relationship to Education.” American Journal of Sociology112(5):1339–82.
45.
MirowskyJohnRossCatherine E.2008. “Education and Self-rated Health: Cumulative Advantage and Its Rising Importance.” Research on Aging30(1):93–122.
46.
NoymerAndrew. 2001. “Mortality Selection and Sample Selection: A Comment on Beckett.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior42(3):326–27.
47.
O’RandAngela M.Hamil-LukerJenifer. 2005. “Processes of Cumulative Adversity: Childhood Disadvantage and Increased Risk of Heart Attack across the Life Course.” Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences60(Special Issue 2):117–24.
48.
PierceJohn P.1989. “International Comparisons of Trends in Cigarette Smoking Prevalence.” American Journal of Public Health79(2):152–57.
49.
PophamFrankDibbenChrisBambraClare. 2013. “Are Health Inequalities Really Not the Smallest in the Nordic Welfare States? A Comparison of Mortality Inequality in 37 Countries.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health67:412–18.
50.
PowerChrisGrahamHilaryDuePernilleHallqvistJohanJoungInezKuhDianaLynchJohn. 2005. “The Contribution of Childhood and Adult Socioeconomic Position to Adult Obesity and Smoking Behaviour: An International Comparison.” International Journal of Epidemiology34(2):335–44.
51.
RossCatherine E.MirowskyJohn. 1999. “Refining the Association between Education and Health: The Effects of Quantity, Credential, and Selectivity.” Demography36(4):445–59.
52.
RossCatherine E.WuChia-Ling. 1996. “Education, Age, and the Cumulative Advantage in Health.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior37(1):104–20.
53.
SalomonJoshua A.NordhagenStellaOzaShefaliMurrayChristopher J. L.2009. “Are Americans Feeling Less Healthy? The Puzzle of Trends in Self-rated Health.” American Journal of Epidemiology170(3):343–51.
54.
SackmannReinhold. 2001. “Age and Labour-market Chances in International Comparison.” European Sociological Review17(4):373–87.
55.
SzmaragdCamilleClarkePaulSteeleFiona. 2013. “Subject Specific and Population Average Models for Binary Longitudinal Data: A Tutorial.” Longitudinal and Life Course Studies4(2):147–65.
56.
Statistiska Centralbyrån. 1984. “Socioekonomisk indelning (SEI)” [Socioeconomic index]. [In Swedish, includes summary in English.]Meddelande i samordningsfrågor1982:4.
57.
van der WelKjetil A.DahlEspenThielenKarsten. 2011. “Social Inequalities in ‘Sickness’: European Welfare States and Non-employment among the Chronically Ill.” Social Science & Medicine73(11):1608–17.
58.
van KippersluisHansO’DonnellOwenvan DoorslaerEddyVan OurtiTom. 2010. “Differences in Health over the Life Cycle in an Egalitarian Country.” Social Science & Medicine70(3):428–38.
59.
VingårdEvaLindbergPerJosephsonMalinVossMargarethaHeijbelBodilAlfredssonLarsStarkStefanNygrenÅke. 2005. “Long-term Sick-listing among Women in the Public Sector and Its Associations with Age, Social Situation, Lifestyle, and Work Factors: A Three-year Follow-up Study.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health33:370–75.
60.
WickramaKandauda A. S.LorenzFrederick O.CongerRand D.1997. “Parental Support and Adolescent Physical Health Status: A Latent Growth-curve Analysis.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior38(2):149–63.
61.
WilkinsonRichard G.1986. Class and Health: Research and Longitudinal Data. London: Tavistock.
62.
WillsonAndrea E.ShueyKim M.ElderGlen H.2007. “Cumulative Advantage Processes as Mechanisms of Inequality in Life Course Health.” American Journal of Sociology112(6):1886–1924.
63.
ZajacovaAnnaDowdJennifer Beam. 2011. “Reliability of Self-rated Health in US Adults.” American Journal of Epidemiology174(8):977–83.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
