This article addresses a potentially serious problem with the widely used self-rated health (SRH) survey item: that different groups have systematically different ways of using the item’s response categories. Analyses based on unadjusted SRH may thus yield misleading results. The authors evaluate anchoring vignettes as a possible solution to this problem. Using vignettes specifically designed to calibrate the SRH item and data from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS; N = 2,625), the authors show how demographic and health-related factors, including sex and education, predict differences in rating styles. Such differences, when not adjusted for statistically, may be sufficiently large to lead to mistakes in rank orderings of groups. In the present sample, unadjusted models show that women have better SRH than men, but this difference disappears in models adjusting for women’s greater health-optimism. Anchoring vignettes appear a promising tool for improving intergroup comparability of SRH.
BanksJamesMarmotMichaelOldfieldZoëSmithJames P.2007. “The SES Health Gradient on Both Sides of the Atlantic.” IFS Working Paper W07/04. Retrieved January 6, 2009 (http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/2653/1/2653.pdf).
2.
BarskyArthur J.PeeknaHeli M.BorusJonathan F.2001. “Somatic Symptom Reporting in Women and Men.” Psychosomatic Medicine62:354–64.
3.
BenyaminiYaelLeventhalElaine A.LeventhalHoward. 2000. “Gender Differences in Processing Information for Making Self-Assessments of Health.” Psychosomatic Medicine62:354–64.
4.
CaseAnnePaxsonChristina. 2005. “Sex Differences in Morbidity and Mortality.” Demography42:189–214.
5.
Datta GuptaNabanitaKristensenNicolaiPozzoliDario. 2010. “External Validation of the Use of Vignettes in Cross-Country Health Studies.” Economic Modelling27:854–65.
6.
DeegDorly J. H.KriegsmanDidi M. W.2003. “Concepts of Self-Rated Health: Specifying the Gender Difference in Mortality Risk.” The Gerontologist43:376–86.
7.
DeSalvoKaren B.BloserNicoleReynoldsKristiHeJiangMuntnerPaul. 2006. “Mortality Prediction with a Single General Self-Rated Health Question: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of General Internal Medicine21:267–75.
8.
DowdJennifer BeamZajacovaAnna. 2007. “Does the Predictive Power of Self-Rated Health for Subsequent Mortality Risk Vary by Socioeconomic Status in the US?” International Journal of Epidemiology36:1214–21.
9.
FerraroKenneth F.1980. “Self-Ratings of Health among the Old and the Old-Old.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior21:377–83.
10.
FillenbaumG. G.1979. “Social Context and Self-Assessments of Health among the Elderly.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior20:45–51.
11.
FrankenbergElizabethJonesNathan R.2004. “Self-Rated Health and Mortality: Does the Relationship Extend to a Low Income Setting?” Journal of Health and Social Behavior45:441–52.
12.
GreeneWilliam H.HensherDavid A.2010. Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Grol-ProkopczykHanna. 2010. “Age, Sex, and Race Effects in Anchoring Vignette Studies: Methodological and Empirical Contributions.” CDE Working Paper No. 2010–18, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
14.
GrootWim. 2000. “Adaptation and Scale of Reference Bias in Self-Assessments of Quality of Life.” Journal of Health Economics19:403–20.
15.
HauserRobert M.RoanCarol L.2006. “The Class of 1957 in their Mid-60s: A First Look (with Variables).” CDE Working Paper No. 2006–03, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
16.
HopkinsDaniel J.KingGary. 2010. “Improving Anchoring Vignettes: Designing Surveys to Correct Interpersonal Incomparability.” Public Opinion Quarterly74: 201–22.
17.
IdlerEllen L.1993. “Age Differences in Self-Assessments of Health: Age Changes, Cohort Differences, or Survivorship?” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences48: S289–S300.
18.
IdlerEllen L.BenyaminiYael. 1997. “Self-Rated Health and Mortality: A Review of Twenty-Seven Community Studies.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior38:21–37.
19.
IdlerEllen L.KaslS. V.1995. “Self-Ratings of Health: Do They Also Predict Change in Functional Ability?” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences50:S344–53.
20.
JürgesHendrik. 2007. “True Health vs Response Styles: Exploring Cross-Country Differences in Self-Reported Health.” Health Economics16:163–78.
21.
JylhäMarjaGuralnikJack M.FerrucciLuigiJokelaJukkaHeikkinenEino. 1998. “Is Self-Rated Health Comparable Across Cultures and Genders?” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences53:S144–52.
22.
JylhäMarjaVolpatoStefanoGuralnikJack M.2006. “Self-Rated Health Showed a Graded Association with Frequently Used Biomarkers in a Large Population Sample.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology59:465–71.
23.
KingGary. 2005. Personal communication made at the June meeting of the Robert Wood Johnson Scholars in Health Policy Research Program, Aspen, CO.
24.
KingGaryMurrayChristopher J. L.SalomonJoshua A.TandonAjay. 2004. “Enhancing the Validity and Cross-Cultural Comparability of Survey Research.” American Political Science Review98:191–207.
25.
KingGaryWandJonathan. 2007. “Comparing Incomparable Survey Responses: Evaluating and Selecting Anchoring Vignettes.” Political Analysis15:46–66.
26.
KrauseNeal M.JayGina M.1994. “What Do Global Self-Rated Health Items Measure?” Medical Care32:930–42.
27.
KroenkeKurtSpitzerRobert L.1998. “Gender Differences in the Reporting of Physical and Somatoform Symptoms.” Psychosomatic Medicine60:150–55.
28.
MacintyreSallyFordGraemeHuntKate. 1999. “Do Women ‘Over-Report’ Morbidity? Men’s and Women’s Responses to Structured Prompting on a Standard Question on Long Standing Illness.” Social Science and Medicine48:89–98.
29.
MenecVerena H.ShooshtariShahinLambertPascal. 2007. “Ethnic Differences in Self-Rated Health among Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis.” Journal of Aging and Health19:62–86.
30.
MurrayChristopher J. L.ChenLincoln C.1992. “Understanding Morbidity Change.” Population and Development Review18:481–503.
31.
MurrayChristopher J. L.TandonAjaySalomonJoshua A.MathersColin D.SadanaRitu. 2002. “New Approaches to Enhance Cross-Population Comparability of Survey Results.” Pp. 421–31 in Summary Measures of Population Health: Concepts, Ethics, Measurement and Applications, edited by MurrayC. J. L.SalomonJ. A.MathersC. D.LopezA. D.Geneva: World Health Organization.
32.
Rabe-HeskethSophiaSkrondalAnders. 2002. “Estimating Chopit Models in gllamm: Political Efficacy Example from King et al.” Retrieved January 20, 2009 (http://www.gllamm.org/chopit.pdf).
33.
ShetterlySusan M.BaxterJudithMasonLynn D.HammanRichard F.1996. “Self-Rated Health among Hispanic vs. Non-Hispanic White Adults: The San Luis Valley Health and Aging Study.” American Journal of Public Health86:1798–801.
34.
VerbruggeLois M.1989. “The Twain Meet: Empirical Explanations of Sex Differences in Health and Mortality.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior30:282–304.
35.
ZimmerZacharyNatividadJosefinaLinHui-ShengChayovanNapaporn. 2000. “A Cross-National Examination of the Determinants of Self-Assessed Health.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior41:465–81.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
