Using data from a 2005 national survey of working adults in the United States, we examine the effects of the gender composition of the superordinate–subordinate role-set on mental and physical health measures. Subordinates' and superordinates' genders are important determinants. Men who work in gender-mixed superordinate contexts (i.e., with one male and one female superior) report lower levels of distress and physical symptoms than men who work with one male superior. Women who work with one male superior report less distress and fewer physical symptoms compared to women who work with one female superior or in gender-mixed superordinate contexts. With a few exceptions, these observations generally hold net of occupation, job sector, and an array of work-related conditions. We discuss the implications of these findings in light of predictions derived from the similarity-attraction and role congruity theories. We also outline ways that theoretical development in relational demography can be refined by a more specific focus on the demographic characteristics—especially gender—of the superordinate—subordinate role-set.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrennerO.C.JosephTomkiewiczScheinVirginia Ellen1989.
“The Relationship between Sex Role Stereotypes and Requisite Management Characteristics Revisited.”Academy of Management Journal32:
662–69
2.
BurkeRonald J.McKeenCarol A.1996.
“Do Women at the Top Make a Difference? Gender Proportions and the Experience of Managerial and Professional Women.”Human Relations49:
1093–1104
3.
ChatmanJennifer A.PolzerJeffrey T.BarsadeSigal G.NealeMargaret A.1998.
“Being Different Yet Feeling Similar: The Influence of Demographic Composition and Organizational Culture on Work Processes and Outcomes.”Administrative Science Quarterly43:
749–80
4.
CooperVirginia W.1997.
“Homophily or the Queen Bee Syndrome: Female Evaluation of Female Leadership.”Small Group Research28:
483–99
5.
CorrellShelley J.RidgewayCecilia L.2003.
“Expectations States Theory.”
Pp. 29–51 in
Handbook of Social Psychology, Handbooks of Sociology, and Social Research,
edited by DelamaterJ.New York, NY:
Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
6.
CortinaLiliaVickiMagleyWilliamsJill H.LanghoutRegina D.2001.
“Incivility in the Workplace: Incidence and Impact.”Journal of Occupational Health Psychology6:
64–80
7.
CromptonRosemaryFionaHarris1998.
“Gender Relations and Employment: The Impact of Occupation.”Work, Employment and Society12:
297–315
8.
DriskellJames E.BrianMullen1990.
“Status, Expectations, and Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review and Test of the Theory.”Personality and Psychology Bulletin16:
541–53
9.
DuffyMichelle K.FerrierWalter J.2003.
“Birds of a Feather …? How Supervisor–Subordinate Dissimilarity Moderates the Influence of Supervisor Behaviors on Workplace Attitudes.”Group and Organization Management28:
217–48
10.
EaglyAlice H.Johannesen-SchmidtMary C.van EngenMarloes L.2003.
“Transformational, Transactional, and Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Women and Men.”Psychological Bulletin129:
569–91
11.
EaglyAlice H.KarauSteven J.2002.
“Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.”Psychological Review109:
573–98
12.
EaglyAlice H.KarauSteven J.MakhijaniMona G.1995.
“Gender and the Effectiveness of Leaders: A Meta-Analysis.”Psychological Bulletin117:
125–45
13.
EaglyAlice H.MakhijaniMona G.KlonskyBruce G.1992.
“Gender and the Evaluation of Leaders: A Meta-Analysis.”Psychological Bulletin111:
3–22
14.
ElliottJames R.SmithRyan A.2001“Ethnic Matching of Supervisors to Subordinate Work Groups: Findings on “Bottom-up” Ascription and Social Closure.”Social Problems48:
258–76
15.
ElyRobin J.1994.
“The Effects of Organizational Demographics and Social Identity on Relationships among Professional Women.”Administrative Science Quarterly39:
203–38
16.
FreeseLeeCohenBernard P.1973.
“Eliminating Status Generalization.”Sociometry36:
177–93
17.
HodsonRandy2002.
“Demography or Respect?: Work Group Demography Versus Organizational Dynamics as Determinants of Meaning and Satisfaction at Work.”British Journal of Sociology53:
291–317
18.
HoelCary L.BrianCooperHelgeFaragher2001.
“The Experience of Bullying in Great Britain: The Impact of Organizational Status.”European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology10:
443–65
19.
JehnKaren A.NorthcraftGregory B.NealeMargaret A.1999.
“Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups.”Administrative Science Quarterly44:
741–63
20.
KanterRosabeth1977.
Men and Women of the Corporation.New York:
Basic Books
21.
KaslStanislav V.1998.
“Measuring Job Stressors and Studying the Health Impact of the Work Environment: An Epidemiologic Commentary.”Journal of Occupational Health Psychology3:
390–401
22.
LepkowskiJames M.1988.
“Telephone Sampling Methods in the United States.”
Pp. 73–98 in
Telephone Survey Methodology,
edited by GrovesR. M.BiemerP. P.LybergL. E.New York, NY:
John Wiley & Sons
23.
MirowskyJohnRossCatherine E.2003.
Social Causes of Psychological Distress.New York, NY:
Aldine de Gruyter
24.
MooreSarahLeonGrunbergGreenbergEdward S.2005.
“Are Female Supervisors Good for Employee Job Experiences, Health, and Well-Being?”Women in Management Review20:
86–95
25.
O'ReillyCharles A.WilliamsKatherine Y.SigalBarsade1998.
“Group Demography and Innovation: Does Diversity Help?”
Pp. 183–207 in
Research on Managing Groups, and Teams, Vol. 1, Composition,
edited by NealeM. A.MannixE. A.GruenfeldD. H..
Stamford, CT:
JAI Press
26.
PearlinLeonard I.1999.
“The Stress Process Revisited: Reflections on Concepts and Their Interrelationships.”
Pp. 395–415 in
The Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health,
edited by AneshenselC. S.PhelanJ. C.New York:
Kluwer Academic/Plenum
27.
PelledLisa HopeEisenhardtKathleen M.XinKatherine R.1999.
“Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Performance.”Administrative Science Quarterly44:
1–28
28.
PerryElissa L.KulikCarol T.JingZhou1999.
“A Closer Look at the Effects of Subordinate-Supervisor Age Differences.”Journal of Organizational Behavior20:
341–57
29.
PfefferJeffrey1983.
“Organizational Demography.”
Pp. 299–357 in
Research in Organizational Behavior,
edited by CummingsL. L.StawB. M.Greenwich, CT:
JAI
30.
ReskinBarbara F.BielbyDenise B.2005.
“A Sociological Perspective on Gender and Career Outcomes.”The Journal of Economic Perspectives19:
71–86
31.
RidgewayCecilia L.2001.
“Gender, Status, and Leadership.”Journal of Social Issues57:
637–55
32.
RidgewayCecilia L.LynnSmith-Lovin1999.
“The Gender System and Interaction.”Annual Review of Sociology25:
191–216
33.
ScottKristyn A.BrownDoug J.2006.
“Female First, Leader Second? Gender Bias in the Encoding of Leadership Behavior.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes101:
230–42
34.
SmithRyan A.2002.
“Race, Gender, and Authority in the Workplace: Theory and Research.”Annual Review of Sociology28:
509–42
35.
StainesGrahamCarolTavris1974.
“The Queen Bee Syndrome.”Psychology Today7:
55–60
TsuiAnne S.O'ReillyCharles A.1989.
“Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational Demography in Superior-Subordinate Dyads.”Academy of Management Journal32:
402–23
38.
ValentineSeanLynnGodkin2000.
“Supervisor Gender, Leadership Style, and Perceived Job Design.”Women in Management Review15:
117–29
39.
ValentineSeanLynnGodkinTurnerJames H.2002.
“Women's Management, Perceived Job Responsibility, and Job Search Intention.”Women in Management Review17:
29–38
40.
VallasSteven P.2003.
“Why Teamwork Fails: Obstacles to Workplace Change in Four Manufacturing Plants.”American Sociological Review68:
223–50
41.
VecchioRobert P.1993.
“The Impact of Differences in Subordinate and Supervisor Age on Attitudes and Performance.”Psychology and Ageing8:
112–19
42.
VecchioRobert P.BullisR. Craig2001.
“Moderators of the Influence of Supervisor-Subordinate Similarity on Subordinate Outcomes.”Journal of Applied Psychology86:
884–96
43.
WajcmanJudy1996.
“Desperately Seeking Differences: Is Management Style Gendered?”British Journal of Industrial Relations34:
333–49
44.
WajcmanJudy1998.
Managing Like a Man: Women and Men in Corporate Management.University Park:
Pennsylvania State University Press
45.
WaksbergJoseph1978.
“Sampling Methods for Random Digit Dialing.”Journal of the American Statistical Association73:
40–46
46.
WhartonAmyBaronJames N.1991.
“Satisfaction? The Psychological Impact of Gender Segregation on Women at Work.”The Sociological Quarterly32:
365–87
47.
WheatonBlair2001.
“The Role of Sociology in the Study of Mental Health … and the Role of Mental Health in Sociology.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior42:
221–34
