The nature of parent-teacher relationships in early childhood programs, including interventions for children with disabilities, is examined within a sociopolitical context across five eras of the twentieth century. Two general approaches are discerned: practices that view parents as learners in need of expert information and advice about child rearing, prevalent through the 1950s, and strategies involving parents as partners with educators in program decision-making, which began to surface in the 1960s. Attention is given to the influence of the Parent Teacher Association in the early 1900s as a response to societal changes stemming from the Industrial Revolution; contributions of the child study movement of the 1920s to parent education activities; effects of the Great Depression on ideas and practices related to individuals with disabilities; the growth of parent advocacy on behalf of children with disabilities; and the influence of the civil rights movement of the 1960s and widespread demographic changes of the 1970s on parent-teacher relationships. Current issues in forming and sustaining parent-teacher partnerships in early childhood programs are identified.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlmyM. (1989). Foreword to D. R. Powell, Families and early childhood programs.Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
2.
AndersonJ. E. (1944). The changing social landscape. In National Congress of Parents and Teachers (Ed.), The Parent-Teacher Organization: Its origins and development (pp. 1–10). Chicago: National Congress of Parents and Teachers.
3.
BaratzS. S., & BaratzJ. C. (1970). Early childhood intervention: The social science base of institutional racism. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 29–50.
4.
BeckmanP. J., RobinsonC. C., RosenbergS., & FilerJ. (1994). Family involvement in early intervention: The evolution of family-centered service. In JohnsonL. J., GallagherR. J., LaMontagneM. J. (Eds.)., Meeting early intervention challenges: Issues from birth to three (2nd ed., pp. 13–32), Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
5.
BettelheimB. (1950). Love is not enough.Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
6.
BredekampS. (Ed.) (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8.Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
7.
BrickerD. D. (1989). Early intervention for at-risk and handicapped infants, toddlers and preschool children.Palo Alto, CA: VORT Corporation.
8.
BrimO. G. (1959). Education for child rearing.New York: Russell Sage.
9.
BrinkerR. P. (1992). Family involvement in early intervention: Accepting the unchangeable, changing the changeable, and knowing the difference. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 307–332.
10.
BronfenbrennerU. (1974). Is early intervention effective? A report on longitudinal evaluations of preschool programs (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Child Development.
11.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
BrownC. W. (1991). IFSP Implementation in the fourth year of P.L. 99-457: The year of the paradox. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 11, 1–18.
13.
BrunerC. (1994). State government and family support: From marginal to mainstream. In KaganS. L., & WeissbourdB. (Eds.), Putting families first (pp. 338–357). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
14.
ButterworthJ. E. (1929). The Parent-Teacher Association and its work.New York: Macmillan.
15.
CochranM., & BrassardJ. (1979). Child development and personal social networks. Child Development, 50, 601–616.
16.
CochranM., & WooleverF. (1983). Beyond the deficit model: The empowerment of parents with information and informal supports. In SigelE. E., & LaosaL. M. (Eds.), Changing families, (pp. 225–245). New York: Plenum.
17.
ColemanJ. S. (1987). Families and schools. Educational Researcher, 16, 32–38.
18.
ComeniusJ. A. (1956). The school of infancy.Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
19.
CowanP. A., PowellD. R., & CowanC. P. (in press). Parenting interventions: A family systems perspective. In SigelE. E., & RenningerK. A. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (fifth edition), Vol. 4: Child Psychology in Practice. New York: Wiley.
20.
DiamondK., & SquiresJ. (1993). The role of parental report in the screening and assessment of young children. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 107–115.
21.
DunstC. J., & TrivetteC. M. (1988). A family systems model of early intervention with handicapped and developmentally at-risk children. In PowellD. R. (Ed.), Parent education as early childhood intervention (pp. 131–179). Norwood. NJ: Ablex.
22.
GalinskyE. (1994). Families and work: The importance of the quality of the work environment. In KaganS. L., & WeissbourdB. (Eds.), Putting families first [pp. 112–136). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
HansonM. J., & LynchE. W. (1992). Family diversity: Implications for policy and practice. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 283–306.
24.
HayesA. H. (1944). Guides and goals for PTAs. In National Congress of Parents and Teachers (Ed.), The Parent-Teacher Organization: Its origins and development (pp. 21–31). Chicago: National Congress of Parents and Teachers.
25.
HeathS. B., & McLaughlinM. W. (1987). A child resource policy: Moving beyond dependence on school and family. Phi Delta Kappan, 68, 576–580.
26.
HerrS. S. (1984). The Phillip Becker case resolved: A chance for habilitation. Mental Retardation, 22, 30–35.
27.
HessR. D. (1980). Experts and amateurs: Some unintended consequences of parent education. In FantiniM. D., & CardenesRene (Eds.), Parenting in a multicultural society (pp. 141–159). New York: Longman.
28.
HollanderR. (1989). Euthanasia and mental retardation: Suggesting the unthinkable. Mental Retardation, 27, 53–62.
29.
HorowitzF. D., & PadenL. Y. (1973). The effectiveness of environmental intervention programs. In CaldwellB. M., & RicciutiH. N. (Eds.), Review of child development research: (Vol. 3) Child development and social policy (pp. 331–402). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
30.
JesterR. E., & GuinaughB. J. (1983). The Gordon Parent Education Infant and Toddler Program. In The Consortium for Longitudinal Studies, As the twig is bent: Lasting effects of preschool programs (pp. 103–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
KaganS. L., & WeissbourdB. (1994). Putting families first: America's family support movement and the challenge of change.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
KenistonK., & the Carnegie Council on Children. (1977). All our children: The American family under pressure.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
33.
KirkS., & GallagherJ. J. (1983). Educating exceptional children (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
34.
KontosS., RaikesH., & WoodsA. (1983). Early childhood staff attitudes toward their parent clientele. Child Care Quarterly, 12, 45–58.
35.
LaosaL. M. (1983). Parent education, cultural pluralism, and public policy: The uncertain connection. In HaskinsR., & AdamsD. (Eds.), Parent education and public policy (pp. 331–345). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
36.
LevensteinP., O'HaraJ., & MaddenJ. (1983). The Mother-Child Home Program of the Verbal Interaction Project. In The Consortium for Longitudinal Studies, As the twig is bent: Lasting effects of preschool programs (pp. 237–264). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
37.
MalloryB. L., & NewR. S. (Eds.), Diversity and developmentally appropriate practices: Challenges for early childhood education.New York: Teachers College Press.
38.
McKeyR. H., CondelliL., GansonH., BarrettJ. J., McConkeyC., & PlantzM. C. (1985). The impact of Head Start on children, families and communities (DHHS Publication No. 85-31193). Washington, DC: CSR Inc.
39.
MeyerL. H. (1994). Editor's introduction. Understanding the impact of inclusion. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 251–252.
40.
MorganD. (1982). Parent participation in the IEP process: Does it enhance appropriate education?Exceptional Education Quarterly, 3, 33–40.
41.
National Academy of Early Childhood Programs. (1984). Accreditation criteria and procedures of the National Academy of Early Childhood Programs.Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
42.
National Congress of Parents and Teachers (1944). The Parent-Teacher Organization: Its origins and development.Chicago, IL: National Congress of Parents and Teachers.
43.
PowellD. R. (1978). The interpersonal relationship between parents and caregivers in day care settings. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 48, 680–689.
44.
PowellD. R. (1989). Families and early childhood programs.Washington. DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
45.
PowellD. R. (1991). Parents and programs: Early childhood as a pioneer in parent involvement and support. In KaganS. L. (Ed.), Ninetieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I: The care and education of America's young children: Obstacles and opportunities (pp. 91–109). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
46.
PowellD. R. (1995). Enabling young children to succeed in school.Washington. DC: American Educational Research Association.
SarasonS. B., & DorisJ. (1979). Educational handicap, public policy, and social history.NY: The Free Press.
49.
ScarrS. (1992). Developmental theories for the 1990s: Development and individual differences. Child Development, 63, 1–19.
50.
SchlossmanS. (1976). Before Home Start: Notes toward a history of parent education in America, 1897-1929. Harvard Educational Review, 46, 430–467.
51.
StipekD., MilburnS., ClementsD., & DanielsD. H. (1992). Parents' beliefs about appropriate education for young children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 13, 293–310.
52.
TaylorK. W. (1968). Parents and children learn together.New York: Teachers College Press.
53.
TurnbullH. R. (1978). The past and future impact of court decisions in special education. Phi Delta Kappan, 59, 523–527.
54.
TurnbullR., TurnbullA., & WheatM. (1982). Assumptions about parental participation: A legislative history. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 3, 1–8.
55.
ValentineJ., & StarkE. (1979). The social context of parent involvement in Head Start. In ZiglerE., & ValentineJ. (Eds.), Project Head Start: A legacy of the War on Poverty (pp. 291–313). New York: Free Press.
56.
WestJ., HauskenE. G., & CollinsM. (1993). Readiness for kindergarten: Parent and teacher beliefs.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U. S. Department of Education (NCES 93-257).
57.
WhippleG. M. (Ed.) (1929). Twenty-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I: Preschool and parental education.Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing.
58.
ZiglerE. F., & TurnerP. (1982). Parents and day care workers: A failed partnership? In ZiglerE. F., & GordonE. W. (Eds.), Day care: Scientific and social policy issues (pp. 174–182). New York: Free Press.
