BrookoverW.B., BeadyC., FloodP., & SchweitzerJ. (1979). School Systems and student achievement: Schools make a difference.New York: Prager.
2.
BrykA.S., LeeV. E., & HollandP.B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
ChubbJ.E., & MoeT. M. (1990). Politics, markets and America's schools.Washington: The Brookings Institution.
4.
CibulkaJ.G., O'BrienT. J., & ZeweD. (1982). Inner city private elementary schools: A study.Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
5.
ColemanJ. S., HofferT., & KilgoreS. (1982). High school achievement.New York: Basic Books.
6.
ColemanJ. S., HofferT. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities.New York: Basic Books.
7.
DerouetJ.-L. (1992). École et Justice.Paris: Métailié.
8.
EckertP. (1989). Jocks & burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high schoolNew York: Teachers College.
9.
GlennC. L. (1991). Controlled choice in Massachusetts public schools. The Public Interest103 (Spring), 88–105.
10.
GlennC. L. (1994a). Choice and urban school reform. In JonesB. A., & BormanK. M. (Eds.) Investing in U.S. schools: Directions for educational policy.Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
11.
GlennC. L. (1994b). Common standards and educational diversity. In De GroofJ. (Ed.) Subsidiarity and education: Aspects of comparative educational law.Leuven (Belgium): Acco.
12.
GrantG. (1986). The world we created at Hamilton High.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
13.
JencksC., SmithM., AclnadH., BaneM. J., CohenD., GintisH., HeynsB., & MichelsonS. (1973). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America.New York: Harper Colophon.
14.
LeeV. E. (1993). Educational choice: The stratifying effects of selecting schools and courses. Educational Policy, 7, 2 (June). 125–148).
15.
LegrandL. (1981). L'école unique: à quelles conditions?Paris: Scarabée.
16.
LevyG. E. (1970). Ghetto school: Class warfare in an elementary school.New York: Pegasus.
17.
LightfootS. L. (1983). The good high school: Portraits of character and culture.Basic Books.
18.
McLachlanJ. (1970). American boarding schools: A historical study.New York: Scribner.
19.
McNeilL. M. (1986). Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge.New York: Routledge.
20.
MetzM. H. (1986). Different by design: The context and character of three magnet schools.New York: Routledge.
21.
MortimoreP., SammonsP., StollL., LewisD., & EcobDavid, (1988). School matters.Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality.New Haven: Yale University Press.
23.
ObinJ.-P., & CROSF. (1991). Le projet d'établissement.Paris: Hachette.
24.
PeshkinA. (1986). God's choice: The total world of a fundamentalist Christian school.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
PeshkinA. (1989). Fundamentalist Christian schools: Should they be regulated?Educational Policy.3, 1 (March), 45–56.
26.
PowellA. G., FarrarE., & CohenD. K. (1985). The shopping mall high school.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
27.
PurkeyS., & SmithM. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal.83, 4.
28.
RaywidM. A. (1990). Successful schools of choice: Cottage industry benefits in large systems. Educational Policy.4, 2 (June), 93–108.
29.
RohlenT. P. (1983). Japan's high schools.Berkeley: University of California Press.
SizerT. R. (1984). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
32.
SizerT. R. (1992). Horace's school: Redesigning the American high school.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
33.
SosniakL. A., & EthingtonC. A. (1992). When public school “choice” is not academic: Findings fom the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.14, 1 (Spring), 35–52.
34.
SteeleL., & LevineR. (1994). Educational innovation in multiracial contexts: The growth of magnet schools in American educationWashington: U.S. Department of Education.
35.
TyackD.B. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban educationCambridge: Harvard University Press.
36.
VermeulenH. (1992). De cultura. Een verhandeling over het cultuurbegrip in de studie van allochtone etnische groepen. Migrantenstudies, 8 (2).