AdamsM. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
2.
ChallJ. S. (1983). The stages of reading development.New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
ClayM. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4.
CunninghamP. M., & CunninghamJ. W. (1992). Making words: Enhancing the invented spelling-decoding connection. The Reading Teacher, 46, 106–115.
5.
DuranR. P. (1989). Testing of linguistic minorities. In LinnR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed) (pp. 573–588). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
6.
GarcíaG. E., & PearsonP. D. (1994). Assessment and diversity. In Darling-HammondL. (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, Vol. 20.Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
7.
GaskinsR. C., GaskinsJ. C., & GaskinsI. W., & GaskinsR. (1991). A decoding program for poor readers—and the rest of the class, too!Language Arts, 68, 213–225.
8.
GoldenbergC., & GallimoreR. (1991). Local knowledge, research knowledge, and educational change: A case study of early Spanish reading improvement. Educational Researcher, 20, pp. 2–14.
9.
IndrisanoR., & ParatoreJ.R. (1991). Classroom contexts for literacy learning. In FloodJ., JensenJ. M., LappD., & SquireJ. R., (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 477–488). New York: Macmillan.
10.
IndrisanoR., & ParatoreJ. R. (1992). Using literature with readers at risk. In CullinanB. E. (Ed.), Invitation to read: More children's literature in the reading program, (pp. 138–149). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
11.
JohnstonP. H. (1992). Constructive evaluation of literate activity.New York: Longman.
12.
JuelC. (1991). Beginning reading. In BarrR., KamilM. L., MosenthalP.B., & PearsonP.D., Handbook of reading research, Vol. II (pp. 759–788). New York: Longman.
13.
MessickS. (1989). Validity. In LinnR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd edition) (pp. 13–103). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
14.
MollL. C. (1992). Literacy research in community and classrooms: A sociocultural approach. In BeachR., GreenJ., KamilM. L., & ShanahanT. (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 211–244). Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English and National Council of Teachers of English.
15.
ParatoreJ. R. (1987). An evaluation of the Chelsea Public Schools reading and language arts program, grades K-6.Boston University: Unpublished report.
16.
ParatoreJ. R. (1991). Flexible grouping: Why and how.Needham, MA: Silver Burdett Ginn.
17.
ParisS. G., LawtonT. A., TurnerJ. C., & RothJ. L. (1991). A developmental perspective on standardized achievement testing. Educational Researcher, 20, 12–19.
18.
ParisS.G., WasikB. A., & TurnerJ.C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In BarrR., KamilM. L., MosenthalP. B., & PearsonP. D., (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. II (pp. 609–640). New York: Longman.
19.
PearsonP. D., & GallagherM. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317–344.
20.
ReutzelD. R., & CooterR. B. (1991). Organizing for effective instruction: The reading workshop. The Reading Teacher, 44, 548–554.
21.
RoyerJ. M., & CunninghamD. J. (1981). On the theory and measurement of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 187–216.
22.
TierneyR., & CunninghamJ. (1984). Research in teaching reading comprehension. In PearsonP. D., BarrR., KamilM. L.Handbook of reading research, Vol. I (pp. 609–655). New York: Longman.
23.
ValenciaS. W., & CalfeeR. (1991). The development and use of literacy portfolios for students, classes and teachers. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 333–346.
24.
WigginsG. P. (1993). Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.