BelenkyM. F., ClinchyB. M., GoldbergerN. R., & TaruleJ. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind.New York: Basic Books.
2.
BermanR. (1989). From Aristotle's dualism to materialist dialectics: Feminist transformation of science and society. In JaggarA. M., & BordoS. R. (Eds.), Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing (pp. 224–255). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
3.
BirkeL. (1986). Changing minds: Towards gender equality in science? In HardingJ. (Ed.), Perspectives on gender and science (pp. 184–202). London: Falmer Press.
4.
BleierR. (1984). Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories on women.New York: Pergamon.
5.
BleierR. (1988a). The cultural price of social exclusion: Gender and science.NWSA Journal, 1(1), 7–19.
6.
BleierR. (1988b). Science and the construction of meaning in the neurosciences. In RosserS. V. (Ed.), Feminism within the science and health care professions: Overcoming resistance (pp. 91–104). Oxford, Pergamon.
7.
BordoS. R. (1986). The Cartesian masculinization of thought.Signs, 11(3), 439–456.
8.
BowersC. A. (1988). The cultural dimensions of educational computing: Understanding the non-neutrality of technology.New York: Teachers College Press.
9.
BushC. G. (1983). Women and the assessment of technology: To think, to be; to unthink, to free. In RothschildJ. (Ed.), Machina ex dea: Feminist perspectives on technology (pp. 151–170). New York: Pergamon.
10.
ChodorowN. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender.Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
ClinchyB. M., BelenkyM. F., GoldbergerN., & TaruleJ. M. (1985). Connected education for women.Journal of Education, 167(3), 28–45.
12.
DamarinS. K. (1984). TABS - Math: A courseware development project. In HansenV. P., & ZwengM. J. (Eds.), Computers in mathematics education (pp. 62–71). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
13.
DiamondI., & QuinbyL. (1988). American feminism and the language of control. In DiamondI., & QuinbyL. (Eds.), Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance (pp. 193–206). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
14.
EislerR. (1987). The chalice and the blade: Our history.San Francisco: Harper and Row.
15.
Fausto-SterlingA. (1985). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men.New York: Basic Books.
16.
GibbonS. (1983). The electronic learning environment of the future. In WhiteM. A. (Ed.), The future of electronic learning (pp. 2–12). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
18.
GinzbergR. (1987). Uncovering gynocentric science.Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 2(3), 89–105.
19.
GoodmanF. (1980, November). Children and computers. Paper read at the National Computer Conference, Chicago.
20.
HardingS. (1986). The science question in feminism.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21.
HardingS. (Fall 1987). The method question.Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 2(3), 19–35.
22.
HartsockN. (1983). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In HardingS., & HintikkaM. (Eds.), Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science (pp. 283–310). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
23.
HendersonH. (Fall, 1988). Thinking globally, acting locally.Woman of Power, No. 11, pp. 13–17.
24.
HubbardR. (1979). Have only men evolved? In HubbardR., HenifinM. S., & FriedB. (Eds.), Women look at biology looking at women (pp. 7–36). Cambridge, MA: Schenkman. (Reprinted in Harding & Hintikka, Discovering Reality).
25.
HubbardR., HenifinM. S., & FriedB. (Eds.). (1979). Women look at biology looking at women: A collection of feminist critiques.Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
26.
HynesH. P. (1989). The recurring silent spring.New York: Pergamon Press.
27.
IrigarayL. (1987). Is the subject of science sexed? (Translation from the French by C. B. Mastrangelo).Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 2(3), 65–87.
28.
JohnsonM. L., & Ferrini-MundyJ. (1989). The mathematical education of underserved and underrepresented groups: A continuing challenge.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 371–375.
29.
KellerE.F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock.San Francisco: Freeman.
30.
KellerE. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science.New Haven: Yale University Press.
31.
KuhnT. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
LonginoH. E. (1987). Can there be a feminist science?Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 2(3), pp. 51–64.
33.
MaherF. (1985). Classroom pedagogy and the new scholarship on women. In CulleyM., & PortugesC. (Eds.), Gendered subjects: The dynamics of feminist teaching (pp. 29–48). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
34.
MaloneT. W. (1980, September). What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Small and Personal Computer Systems.
35.
McKeeC. (1988). Toward a feminist science and technology.Woman of Power, No. 11, p. 4.
36.
MerchantC. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution.New York: Harper and Row.
37.
MurphyJ. W., & PardeckJ. T. (1985). The technological world-view and the responsible use of computers in the classroom.Journal of Education167(3), 98–108.
PerkinsD. N., & SimmonsR. (1988). Patterns of misunderstanding: An integrative model for science, math, and programming.Review of Educational Research, 58, 303–326.
40.
RoseH. (1983). Hand, brain, and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciences.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 9(1), 73–90.
41.
RossiterM. W. (1982). Women scientists in America: Struggles and strategies to 1940.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
42.
SilverE. A. (1985). Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43.
SloanD., ed. (1984). The computer in education: A critical perspective.New York: Teachers College Press.
44.
StreibelM. J. (1986). A critical analysis of the use of computers in education.Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 34(3), 137–161.
45.
ThompsonP. J. (1989). Science, technology, and patriarchal language.Feminists in Science and Technology, 2(2), 1, 8-9.
46.
ThompsonP. W. (1985). Experience, problem solving, and learning mathematics: Considerations in developing mathematics curricula. In SilverE. A. (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 189–236). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47.
TobiasS. (1978). Overcoming math anxiety.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
48.
TobiasS., & WeissbrodC. (1980). Anxiety and mathematics: An update.Harvard Educational Review, 50(1), 63–70.
49.
TumaD. T., & ReifF. (1980). Problem solving and education: Issues in teaching and research.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50.
TurkleS. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit.New York: Simon & Schuster.
51.
TurkleS. (1988). Computational reticence: Why women fear the intimate machine. In KramaraeC. (Ed.), Technology and women's voices: Keeping in touch (pp. 41–61). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
52.
WhatleyM. (1986). Taking feminist science to the classroom: Where do we go from here? In BleierR. (Ed.), Feminist approaches to science (pp. 181–190). New York: Pergamon Press.
53.
ZitaJ. N. (1988). The feminist question in the science question in feminism.Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 3(1), 158–168.