Definitions of literacy are explored as tropes which invariably express a social relationship between self and other. Hence, definitions project the cultural terms on which the literate members of a society wish to live with those deemed to be illiterate. The essay raises questions about the illiterate other being defined by current definitions of adult literacy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ColvinR. J., & RootJ. H. (1976). Tutor.Syracuse, NY: Literacy Volunteers of America.
2.
DonaldJ. (1983). How illiteracy became a problem (and literacy stopped being one). Journal of Education, 165(1), 35–52.
3.
ElsasserN., & IrvineP. (1985). English and Creole: The dialectics of choice in a college writing program. Harvard Educational Review, 45, 399–415.
4.
FineM. (1986). Why urban adolescents drop into and out of public high school. Teachers College Record, 87, 393–409.
5.
FingeretA. (1984). Adult literacy education: Current and future directions.Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career and Vocational Education.
6.
FreireP. (1968). Pedagogy of the oppressed.New York: The Seabury Press.
7.
GirouxH. A. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition.South Hadley, MA.: Bergin & Garvey.
8.
GoodyJ., & WattI. (1968). The consequences of literacy. In GoodyJ. (Ed.), Literacy in traditional societies.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
HeathS. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
HunterC., & HarmanD. (1979). Adult illiteracy in the United States: A report to the Ford Foundation.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
11.
KazemekF. E. (1985). An examination of the Adult Performance Level project and its effect on adult literacy education in the United States. Lifelong Learning, 9(2), 24–28.
12.
KozolJ. (1980). A new look at the literacy campaign in Cuba. In WolfM., McQuillanM. K., & RadwinE. (Eds.), Language and thought/Language and reading (pp. 466–497). Cambridge: Harvard Educational Review Reprint Series No. 14.
13.
Levi-StraussC. (1973). Tristes tropiques.New York: Atheneum. (Original work published 1955)
14.
NorthcuttN. (1975). Adult functional competency: A summary.Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
15.
OhmannR. (1985). Literacy, technology, and monopoly capitalism. College English, 47, 675–689.
16.
OlsonC. P. (1983). Inequality remade: The theory of correspondence and the context of French immersion in northern Ontario. Journal of Education, 165(1), 75–98.
17.
OngW. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word.New York: Methuen.
18.
Over 12 percent of adults illiterate, census says. (1986, April 30). Education Week, p. 4.
19.
ResnickD. P., & ResnickL. B. (1980). The nature of literacy: An historical exploration. In WolfM., McQuillanM. K., & RadwinE. (Eds.). Language and thought/Language and reading (pp. 396–411). Cambridge: Harvard Educational Review Reprint Series No. 14.
20.
ScribnerS., & ColeM. (1981). The psychology of literacy.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
21.
SnoweT. (1985, December 3). Literacy has many happy returns. Philadelphia Inquirer, p. 11–A.
22.
SzwedJ. (1981). The ethnography of literacy. In WhitemanM. F. (Ed.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
U.S. Department of Education, (undated). Update on adult illiteracy. [Factsheet in letter sent May 22, 1986].
24.
U.S. Department of Labor, Time of change: 1983 handbook of women workers.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1983.
