Views of mathematics as absolute and not person-made, which are popular but not consistent with the practice of mathematics, are presented through the voices and experiences of women, most of whom have avoided mathematics. Research on women's reasoning is used to present a new perspective for understanding this experience. Strategies for teaching mathematics developed with math-avoidant students are offered as a means of enlarging the group of people who can bring mathematics effectively into their lives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrownS. I. (1984). The logic of problem generation: From morality and solving to de-posing and rebellion. For the Learning of Mathematics, 4(1), 9–20.
2.
BuerkD. (1981). Changing the conception of mathematical knowledge in intellectually able, math avoidant women (Doctoral dissertation, SUNY at Buffalo, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42(1), 119A.
3.
BuerkD. (1982). An experience with some able women who avoid mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(2), 19–24.
4.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5.
HalmosP. R. (1968). Mathematics as a creative art. American Scientist, 56(4), 375–389.
6.
HendersonD. (1981). Mathematics and liberation. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1(3), 12–13.
7.
KeganR. (1977). Ego and truth: Personality and the Piagetian paradigm. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
8.
LyonsN. P. (1983). Two perspectives: On self, relationships, and morality. Harvard Education Review, 53(2), 125–145.
9.
National Academy of Science. (1983). Climbing the ladder: An update on the status of doctoral women scientists and engineers. (Report of the Committee on Education and Employment of Women in Science and Engineering.) Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10.
PerryW. G.Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
11.
PerryW. G.Jr. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In ChickeringA. (Ed.), The modern American college (pp. 76–116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
PotterB. D. (1978). The train and the fly or why I hate math. The Two-Year College Mathematics Journal, 9(1), 3–4.
13.
SassenG. (1980). Success anxiety in women: A constructivist interpretation of its source and its significance. Harvard Education Review, 50(1), 13–24.
