Shadow and Light: Read,Dewey,Plato,and Aesthetic Education

Abstract

This essay examines the aesthetics of Herbert Read, John Dewey and Plato, and their influence on contemporary aesthetic education.

The aesthetics of Read and Dewey have been extremely seductive to aesthetic educators for two reasons, the first of which is that they provide a “democratic” or inclusive aesthetic which appears readily integratible into school curricula. The other reason is that Read and Dewey are explicitly prescriptive and practical in their recommendations. Yet the democratic aesthetic is found to be philosophically untenable and inadequate to art. Plato's aesthetics, to which both Read and Dewey claim allegiance, are more philosophically astute and present the fundamental dilemma of aesthetic education: how to reconcile the intrinsically subversive nature of art with the conservative aims of education.

The essay contends that aesthetic educators must abandon their traditional arguments on behalf of the arts. They must confront the dilemma of conflicting aims and move towards a new basis for the inclusion of the arts in education. Concomitantly, education will be required to broaden its purposes so that what has hitherto been perceived as subversive will now be recognized as essential to the examined life — knowledge of complexity, paradox, and conflict which extend beyond “right answers. ”

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atkins

J.W.H.

Literary criticism in antiquity. New York: P. Smith, 1934.

Burke

The philosophy of literary form (rev. ed.). New York: Vintage Books, 1957.

Coleridge

S.T.

Biographia literaria. Watson

George

(Ed.) New York: E.P. Dutton and Company, 1956.

Cornford

F. M.

(tr.)., The republic of Plato. London: Oxford University Press, 1945.

Dewey

Art as experience. New York: Capricorn Books, 1934.

Eisner

E.W.

Educating artistic vision. New York: Macmillan, 1972.

Ferguson

REPUBLIC Book Ten. London, 1957.

Friedlander

Plato. Vol. I.: An introduction. Hans Meyerhoff (tr.). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1970.

Greene

W.C.

Plato's view of poetry. Harvard Studies in Classical Philosophy, 1918, 29, 1–75.

10.

Havelock

Preface to Plato. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963.

11.

Jung

C.G.

Psychology and literature. In Ghiselin

(Ed.), The creative process: A symposium. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1954.

12.

Kincaid

The determination and description of various creative attributes of children. In Brittain

W.L.

(Ed.), Creativity and art education. Washington, D.C.: National Art Education Association, 1964.

13.

Langer

Philosophy in a new key. New York: New American Library, 1951.

14.

Read

Education through art. New York: Pantheon Books, 1974.

15.

Smith

C.M.

The aesthetics of John Dewey and aesthetic education. Educational Theory, 1971, 21, 2, 131–145. Reprinted in R.A. Smith (Ed.), Aesthetics and problems of education. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1971, 64–85.

16.

Swanger

Ideology and aesthetic education. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 1981, 15, 2, 33–44.

17.

Torrance

E.P.

Career patterns and peak creative achievements of creative high school students twelve years later. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 1972, XVI, 2, 75–88.

18.

Woodcock

Herbert Read: The stream and the source. London: Faber, 1972.